Originally posted by Darth Revan33
I forgot about Malak fighting on the front lines and stuff, apologies. Sure Bandon was trained from birth as a Jedi and then he had less than a year of training to be a Sith lord. It was not two years. That's not much time. Maul was older and had his whole life to be trained by a Sith lord. Now about Janus' point that Bandon was trained by more than one master because it was a group thing, yes he did but that also means the teachers spent less time with him as they had more students. Sidious had no one else to teach.Now in actual combat, we know Maul killed everyone in black sun, 3 Jedi 2 of them masters who were strong with a lightsaber. He also killed a ship full of togorian pirates, tusken raiders, and many assassin droids. He was constantly being tested by Sidious to become the perfect weapon. Sidious once filled his room full of dinkos just because he had flinched. Now I'm not saying Bandon is a total wuss, but he didn't have nearly the training Maul did. It's like comparing Maul to a weaker ESB Luke. And just because he killed more Jedi doesn't mean he's stronger. Aurra Sing, Atton Rand, HK-47 all kill plenty of Jedi but that doesn't make them stronger. Maul didn't have the chance to fight more Jedi because Sidious wouldn't let him. And the Jedi Bandon killed could have been masters or they could have been padawans. We don't know who he killed or how strong they were, but we do know Maul defeat two powerful Jedi at the same time with ease.
While I respect your opinions, you guys are banking a lot on what ifs. There just isn't enough facts about Bandon and Maul had WAY more training and some known Jedi under his belt.
Maul killed Togorians. It's a nice accomplishment. But a Jedi is worth easily a dozen or so Togorians. They're just big cat people. Not to discredit the act, but it's not a benchmark. And neither are tuskan raiders. Anakin as a padawan massacred a whole camp full. They're not amazingly advanced or high thinking adversaries. Assassin droids ca be a pain, I agree. I'm not sure what manner of droids Maul eliminated, but I'm sure it was an accomplishment since it's on his resume.
Now, comparing Bandon to ESB Luke is a false analogy. Why? Well, ESB Luke had all the mastery and training of a first grader in boot camp. He's not even a padawan as far as I'm concerned. But back to your other points, you're saying that just because Bandon killed many Jedi and Sith, it doesn't make him better, while at the same time saying Maul killed a bunch of non-Jedi opponents and two masters and is thus better. Oh, and tacking on Sidious' rigorous training program.
Unless it says somewhere specifically that Maul has the neccessary training to hold up to a resume of Bandon's which includes full Jedi training and the deaths of many Jedi, and also being promoted within a year to the second most powerful Sith in a time of hundreds, I just can't see him being better.