Originally posted by Lana
So now you're debating how species are classified?
Actually yes..Hybridization is something that commonly occurs between species within the same family..Now ask yourself this question..how come no form of hybridization can be duplicated between humans/apes?
And then once you answer that question..follow up with this one..how come no hybrid fossil(transitionary) has been found...linking humans to apes?
A lot of tough questions...
And while your at it Lana..theres a few other pertinent points that you did not address in one of my previous posts, however, you stated that you would address them..let me repost them for you..
Hybridization amongst animals of in the same "family" is not new concept, and supports Creationist arguments of various species of animals within a particular family, being of one particular kind.
It can not be duplicated between animals coming from different "families" (ie cat cross breeding with a dog...Human crossbreeding with an ape)
The fact that animals of the different kinds can not breed and produce intermediate offspring, and that "no intermediate forms" have been found..essentially defeats any relation between hybridization..and the concept of Macro evolution
hybridization has been known to to produce fertile offspring. Anyway..using yours/others assumption that hybridization more than likely causes sterility...you are essentially defeating the argument of hybridization producing sexually functional intermediates capable of producing new species of plants/animals/etc....
Who's avoiding the issues now sweety? 😍
Originally posted by whobdamandog
Actually yes..Hybridization is something that commonly occurs between species within the same family..Now ask yourself this question..how come no form of hybridization can be duplicated between humans/apes?And then once you answer that question..follow up with this one..how come no hybrid fossil(transitionary) has been found...linking humans to apes?
A lot of tough questions...
Because we didn't evolve from apes - we had a same common ancestor.
Originally posted by whobdamandog
And while your at it Lana..theres a few other pertinent points that you did not address in one of my previous posts, however, you stated that you would address them..let me repost them for you..Who's avoiding the issues now sweety? 😍
You. Again.
I'm sorry, excuse me for having other things to do. I do have a life, you know, and have better things to do then argue with you. I'll get to it when I get to it.
And I still want to see your proof that an intelligent being exists. And don't even pull that "I'll post it when you post your evidence" bullshit, because we're not in grade school anymore. Post your proof, or you have no argument. Clear as that.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional/part1a.html#tran
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional/part1a.html#gaps
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional/part1a.html#pred
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional/part1a.html#time
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional/part2a.html#primate
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional/part2c.html#misc
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional/part2c.html#conc
Lot to read, I'm sure you'll completely ignore it all....
Originally posted by Lana
I'm sorry, excuse me for having other things to do. I do have a life, you know, and have better things to do then argue with you. I'll get to it when I get to it.
Which essentially means that your are unable to rebut what I have said..
And I still want to see your proof that an intelligent being exists. And don't even pull that "I'll post it when you post your evidence"
bullshit,
I'll post my evidence when you post your evidence..😆😆
because we're not in grade school anymore. Post your proof, or you have no argument. Clear as that.
So I guess the final nail in the coffin has been struck..both of our religions..depend on FAITH...
Originally posted by whobdamandog
According to those who support Evolutionary theory...
Originally posted by whobdamandog
Allow me to provide evidence that is equally
but you know... Once again..I'll accept that statement as another example of you running out of valid arguments...please make sure that you go and educate yourself with some form of higher learning...judging by the intelligence level you have demonstrated on this thread..I'm guarantee you're going to need it...😆😆😆
Originally posted by whobdamandog
Which essentially means that your are unable to rebut what I have said..I'll post my evidence when you post your evidence..😆😆
So I guess the final nail in the coffin has been struck..both of our religions..depend on FAITH...
No, what it meant was that at the moment when you were demanding all these damn answers is that I was in the ****ing shower and am getting ready to go out for the day. But why am I justifying myself to you?
Selective reading again, I noticed that you completely disregarded the links I posted which would give you plenty of information and evidence on how species evolved, transitionary fossils, etc. Why don't you remove your blinkers and actually look around you?
I've studied religion and I've studied science. I know that there's a difference between the two. I know how to recognize it. And something that's based on an intelligent being (which there is no proof exists), is NOT science. Something that is based on evidence that has been found and studied over numerous years is.
Originally posted by Lana
No, what it meant was that at the moment when you were demanding all these damn answers is that I was in the ****ing shower and am getting ready to go out for the day. But why am I justifying myself to you?
Because like most women..you find my intellect captivating..and are obviously feel some form of attraction to me...😆😆
Selective reading again, I noticed that you completely disregarded the links I posted which would give you plenty of information and evidence on how species evolved, transitionary fossils, etc. Why don't you remove your blinkers and actually look around you?
Your just mad because your theory has been reduced to nothing more than just another religion..truth hurts sweety...
I've studied religion and I've studied science. I know that there's a difference between the two. I know how to recognize it. And something that's based on an intelligent being (which there is no proof exists), is NOT science. Something that is based on evidence that has been found and studied over numerous years is.
Sweety, you and others didn't even know that Buddhism was a religion. You need to do some more studying...however...it has been very fun debating with you...
😆 the idea of you having intellect is one of the most humerous ideas I ever read. Keep up the work, whob, you just made my day 🙂
but for your information: the theory still stands, accept the truth
Originally posted by whobdamandog
Yeah you are right Yerssott doesn't know what the hell he's talking about..lol..that's another thing that has been definitively proven throughout this debate..
Originally posted by whobdamandog
Because like most women..you find my intellect captivating..and are obviously feel some form of attraction to me...😆😆Your just mad because your theory has been reduced to nothing more than just another religion..truth hurts sweety...
Sweety, you and others didn't even know that Buddhism was a religion. You need to do some more studying...however...it has been very fun debating with you...
More like your lack of intellect repulses me....
How can you have 'reduced our theory to a religion' WHEN YOU WON'T BOTHER TO ACKNOWLEDGE ANYTHING WE SAY? Everytime someone posts evidence you completely disregard it altogether or pick out the weakest bits and claim everything's wrong off of one sentence.
For one thing, I never said a damn thing about Buddhism, because that argument was totally irrelevent. I have studied plenty, and can safely say that I know what I'm talking about. You have made clear from your posts that you know nothing about evolution.
On missing links: Would it still be called a missing link if it were found? No. EVERYTHING started out as a missing link, and over time scientists have been able to fill in many blanks.
On transitionary fossils: Number one, the chance of finding fossils at all is small, as it's very rare that something becomes fossilized. Had you bothered to look at those links I posted you would know this. Number two, the term 'transitionary fossils' is very misleading. Evolution hasn't stopped just because humans run the earth. We're still evolving, and other organisms are still evolving. EVERYTHING is a transitionary 'fossil', if you will.
(I put fossil in parantheses in that last sentence there because obviously beings that are still alive and skeletons and such that haven't become fossilized are obviously not fossils, but I'm sure everyone gets what I'm saying. Or at least, I'd hope they do.)
Originally posted by yerssot
😆 the idea of you having intellect is one of the most humerous ideas I ever read. Keep up the work, whob, you just made my day 🙂but for your information: the theory still stands, accept the truth
unfortunatly for you, I studied evolution in my archaeology class at a reputated uni... you on the other hand place agains that... well... what? an old story with no proof? [/B]
Yersott you essentially lost all your credibility when you stated that you believed that Buddha was the only one capable of classifying Buddhism as a religion...😆😆😆
Seriously Bud..I pretty much disregard everything you say..none of it makes any sense..
Originally posted by Lana
More like your lack of intellect repulses me....
That's why you keep on coming back..because you are so repulsed..😆😆
How can you have 'reduced our theory to a religion' WHEN YOU WON'T BOTHER TO ACKNOWLEDGE ANYTHING WE SAY? Everytime someone posts evidence you completely disregard it altogether or pick out the weakest bits and claim everything's wrong off of one sentence.
Where is the missing link?
How come hybridization does not exist between animals of different types?
How is it that you can claim a theory valid..if the most pertinent part of the theory is missing?
Those are the questions no one has acknowledged on the opposing side...those are valid questions..
On transitionary fossils: Number one, the chance of finding fossils at all is small, as it's very rare that something becomes fossilized. Had you bothered to look at those links I posted you would know this. Number two, the term 'transitionary fossils' is very misleading. Evolution hasn't stopped just because humans run the earth. We're still evolving, and other organisms are still evolving. EVERYTHING is a transitionary 'fossil', if you will.
Call me when you've evolved into something reminiscent of an intelligent being...😆 😆 😆
Originally posted by whobdamandog
Yersott you essentially lost all your credibility when you stated that you believed that Buddha was the only one capable of classifying Buddhism as a religion...😆😆😆Seriously Bud..I pretty much disregard everything you say..none of it makes any sense..