Why Prayers Aren't Answered.

Started by sonnet25 pages
Originally posted by Shaggy2dope
easiest question ever God isn't real

So what you are telling us is that you are omnipresent and have total knowledge of the whole universe to make that statement that God does not exist. Sorry but there are no one who can make such a claim.

Originally posted by PrinceofBlades
God answers all prayer in congruency to hie will. Prayers such as "Can I live forever?" "Can I have..." "I want..." are sometimes answered, but on God's time.

"Unanswered prayers are themselves answered."

You have probably mentioned the most important aspect of prayer and that is that all happens on God's time.

Originally posted by sonnet
So what you are telling us is that you are omnipresent and have total knowledge of the whole universe to make that statement that God does not exist. Sorry but there are no one who can make such a claim.

Just like there is no one who can make the claim that god does exist.

indeed

Originally posted by Storm
Just like there is no one who can make the claim that god does exist.

If God doesn't exsist, then where did we come from?

Originally posted by PrinceofBlades
If God doesn't exsist, then where did we come from?

Natural processes.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Natural processes.

What started these natural processes?

What started these natural processes?
natural processes

If God doesn't exsist, then where did we come from?
where did god come form

Originally posted by finti
natural processes

What started those natural processes?


where did god come form

It is easier to believe through faith, that God has no beginning and thus no end, than logically trying to prove a beginning to science.

What started those natural processes?
natural processes, it has always been there. Just using the same lame argument as a god that has no begining and no end

It is easier to believe through faith, that God has no beginning and thus no end, than logically trying to prove a beginning to science
easier doesnt make it correct , and the way to escape the logical aspects of it just show how shaky that faith really is

Originally posted by finti
natural processes, it has always been there. Just using the same lame argument as a god that has no begining and no end

Logically it's lame, but religiously it is acceptable. Because with religion, "leaps of faith" are made to believe a truth.


easier doesnt make it correct , and the way to escape the logical aspects of it just show how shaky that faith really is

it only shakes if your rocking it.

Originally posted by PrinceofBlades
It is easier to believe through faith, that God has no beginning and thus no end, than logically trying to prove a beginning to science.

Easier it is indeed. Faith is belief in something in the absence of supporting evidence.

Originally posted by Storm
Easier it is indeed. Faith is belief in something in the absence of supporting evidence.

Yes, that means I was right! Sweet victory...
(I know I shouldn't start rejoicing because finiti is going to come in an crash my party. But that should be all the reason to party, right?)

Why does eveything have to be so cut and dry? Natural processes and God can go together. Naturally. 😎

Originally posted by PrinceofBlades
Yes, that means I was right! Sweet victory...
(I know I shouldn't start rejoicing because finiti is going to come in an crash my party. But that should be all the reason to party, right?)

Then how can you state as a fact that god, if he/she/it already exists, has no beginnnig and no end?

Originally posted by Storm
Then how can you state as a fact that god, if he/she/it already exists, has no beginnnig and no end?

What I meant is enjoying the fact that some one here actually agrees than fight about the smallest detail. The enjoyment will end when finiti will come back and start debating again.

I perfectly understood what you were saying.

I' ll repeat my question. You agreed that faith is belief in something in the absence of supporting evidence. Then how can you state as a fact that god, if he/she/it already exists, has no beginning and no end?

because they limited their ways to acknowledge the simple way out

Originally posted by finti
because they limited their ways to acknowledge the simple way out

As opposed to killing yourself making an idea more complicated than it already is.

If God is truly all powerful and indescribable and all in all, then He is in no need of anything. He is complete, so we don't need to make him happy, or feel loved, or feel worthy, or boost his ego with worship really, cause he is already complete as is. That's what a God is. The church has made god less then what he is by saying he needs this or that or else. The church gave him human qualities and emotions..God is a thing...a really big all encompassing thing...It/He doesn't have negative human emotions.

God is like an invisible fog that's everywhere and inbetween everywhere