Doomsday Vs. Galactus

Galactus has multiple ways of killing Doomsday, he could also make him his herald. I could also see Galactus destroying DD forever if he puts his interest into it. If we would go by killing, evolve, get killed again etc. Then yes I do believe that DD could evolve past Galactus, but this would mean Galactus has to be stupid and patient enough to kill him over and over again.

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
No, it was made by a moron who thought Doomsday could never die by the same "power level" twice, and therefore Galactus would have to use full power to hurt him. Because he got killed by Imperiex.

It's not a hypothetical, it's a "I have no idea what I'm talking about" thread.

Even if he were right, the casualness of Imperiex doing it goes against that. And the threadstarter thought Imperiex was the same level as Galactus so therefore he thinks DD could beat Imperiex in a rematch. Let's listen to that guy.

Shhh.. can you hear that? Wait for it, wait for it. h1a8 is calculating the number of Earth weights that DD would need to put G Mon on his back, for the Royal Tea Bagging competition.

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
His fight with Thor with extenuating circumstance in which Thor makes him flee.

And that statement of Sentry stalemating Galactus made by spiderman and Iirc X-man

I meant those two instances

It was off panel supposedly by two people and stalemating isn't beat Galactus

Originally posted by h1a8
But what evidence do we have that Galactus can consume trans level or higher beings? Can he consume Odin in a forum fight?
If Galactus has shown it then it counts.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
Thor used a godblast lol.

It was off panel supposedly by two people and stalemating isn't beat Galactus

I agree it was off-panel(in fact it all could've just been a delusional by Sentry), but depending on context, Sentry stalemating Galactus can be quite bad for the big G.

^Thor made a hungry Galactus run for his money, I can see Sentry defying a hungry Galactus a planet by a lot of means, and thus stalemating him.

Originally posted by Prof. T.C McAbe
^Thor made a hungry Galactus run for his money, I can see Sentry defying a hungry Galactus a planet by a lot of means, and thus stalemating him.

Originally posted by Delta1938
I agree it was off-panel(in fact it all could've just been a delusional by Sentry), but depending on context , Sentry stalemating Galactus can be quite bad for the big G.

huhu

Originally posted by Delta1938
huhu

Sorry
cough

Originally posted by Delta1938
I agree it was off-panel(in fact it all could've just been a delusional by Sentry), but depending on context, Sentry stalemating Galactus can be quite bad for the big G.

Originally posted by Delta1938
I agree it was off-panel(in fact it all could've just been a delusional by Sentry), but depending on context, Sentry stalemating Galactus can be quite bad for the big G.

For all we know, it probably never even happened considering the contradictory accounts given by 2 different characters.

Sentry stalemating Galactus is about as reliable an account of Galactus as Hawkeye claiming that Galactus was a myth created and perpetuated by the Fantastic Four.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
Thor used a godblast lol.

It was off panel supposedly by two people and stalemating isn't beat Galactus

He also did use a godblast vs Juggernaut so :/

Is still a bad showing for Galactus any way you want to see it.

So I stick to my statement which in any way does not contradicts yours.

Galactus wins if he is not jobing, unless you think Galactus never jobs?

Originally posted by Insane Titan
stale mating someone doesn't mean you did well, hell Marvel hold the stance Thanos stalemated Odin (bios,Editor in chief) but we all know how the fight was going and would of gone

That's kinda my point. I know we didn't see it, and don't even know if it actually happened. But let's assume it did, and assume Sentry was just straight-up stalemating Galactus through pure power and doing fine, and Galactus wasn't particularly suffering from his hunger.

Originally posted by Epicurus
How is it bad for Galactus when we know not the context, or the situations surrounding such an encounter?

For all we know, it probably never even happened considering the contradictory accounts given by 2 different characters.

Sentry stalemating Galactus is about as reliable an account of Galactus as Hawkeye claiming that Galactus was a myth created and perpetuated by the Fantastic Four.

You're not really saying anything that goes against what I said in my post. I was saying depending on the context, because Titan simply dismissed Rao's example as "stalemating isn't winning." I also agree we don't even know if it happened at all.

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
He also did use a godblast vs Juggernaut so :/

Is still a bad showing for Galactus any way you want to see it.

So I stick to my statement which in any way does not contradicts yours.

Galactus wins if he is not jobing, unless you think Galactus never jobs?

And the rules of the forum indicate characters fight to the best of their abilities.

Not to mention that statement was made at a time when Void was running through a shitton of heroes on Earth including Hulk/Thor/Dr Strange and then Sentry defeated him. IE, it was before Sentry became a crazy ass hole, and there exists a cockstroking Sentry thread right now that will tell you what that means. Currently Sentry is apparently as powerful as almost every Avenger/hero ranging in the hundreds. And there's very few appearances of Galactus you could even twist into saying he'd lose to Doomsday.

And Doomsday can't match a Godblast either. And Juggernaut tanking a Godblast by a weakened Thor was Juggernaut's far and away best durability feat.

Originally posted by Delta1938
But let's assume it did, and assume Sentry was just straight-up stalemating Galactus through pure power and doing fine, and Galactus wasn't particularly suffering from his hunger.

Unless we believe Nate Grey/Sentry flew into the middle of nowhere to fight Galactus after he just fed.

Originally posted by Delta1938
You're not really saying anything that goes against what I said in my post. I was saying depending on the context, because Titan simply dismissed Rao's example as "stalemating isn't winning." I also agree we don't even know if it happened at all.

Plain and simple so you guys understand

Galactus should not even stalemate Thor, but lets not pretend that it has not happened

Galactus should stomp thor or doomsday easily

Also I will suggest you re read that fight of thor vs jugss because right before the gb thor states that he has regained his strength.

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Plain and simple so you guys understand

Galactus should not even stalemate Thor, but lets not pretend that it has not happened

Galactus should stomp thor with easy.

Also I will suggest you re read that fight of thor vs jugss because right before the gb thor states that he has regainrd his strength.

Regained his strength to move again is all that referred to. Because he was laying there with a seizure for almost a full comic. I'd go look for the statements where Thor states his strength fades for a long while after said seizures, but it isn't needed.

But Thor being weakened or not isn't the point. The Godblast has blown through Exitar's dome which was more durable than his outside armor. Almost killed a weakened Galactus. And blew a hole through a being with Odin's power, Perrikus who was said to rival Odin and almost defeated him prior, Zelia who was above Perrikus, and like hundreds of other lesser Dark Gods.
And Juggernaut tanked it. Totally legitimate feat to use for Juggernaut. Let's use solely this feat to downplay the Godblast, because it couldn't possibly be a hundred times more impressive than Juggernaut's next feat.

Sigh, I'll get back to you with the semantics tomorrow (well later today)

But we agree that Galactus should stomp Thor or Doomsday right?

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Sigh, I'll get back to you with the semantics tomorrow (well later today)

But we agree that Galactus should stomp Thor or Doomsday right?

Also Juggernaut amirite?

But yes Galactus stomps if we use depictions of him with absolutely no low showings. He's going to need all the help he can get against Doomsday.

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
He also did use a godblast vs Juggernaut so :/

Is still a bad showing for Galactus any way you want to see it.

So I stick to my statement which in any way does not contradicts yours.

Galactus wins if he is not jobing, unless you think Galactus never jobs?

Galactus never jobs to people of Doomsday lvl by getting punched out

Why are ppl using Thor's showing against Galactus as a marker? Doomsday can't replicate anything close to a godblast in terms of power so the point is redundant