Doomsday Vs. Galactus

Started by Branlor Swift9 pages

Originally posted by Insane Titan
Why are ppl using Thor's showing against Galactus as a marker? Doomsday can't replicate anything close to a godblast in terms of power so the point is redundant
You see the underlying plot of this thread is that Galactus just expended his energy fighting Ego. And while Galactus is about to kill Ego Doomsday is readying his Doomsblast to fire at Galactus unbeknownst to Galactus.

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
You see the underlying plot of this thread is that Galactus just expended his energy fighting Ego. And while Galactus is about to kill Ego Doomsday is readying his Doomsblast to fire at Galactus unbeknownst to Galactus.
ah yeah I see.

Evolving on the spot FTW

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
And we've seen Galactus not hungry tank an amped Godblast.

And the rules of the forum indicate characters fight to the best of their abilities.

Not to mention that statement was made at a time when Void was running through a shitton of heroes on Earth including Hulk/Thor/Dr Strange and then Sentry defeated him. IE, it was before Sentry became a crazy ass hole, and there exists a cockstroking Sentry thread right now that will tell you what that means. Currently Sentry is apparently as powerful as almost every Avenger/hero ranging in the hundreds. And there's very few appearances of Galactus you could even twist into saying he'd lose to Doomsday.

And Doomsday can't match a Godblast either. And Juggernaut tanking a Godblast by a weakened Thor was Juggernaut's far and away best durability feat.

Which is retarded to believe considering there's no reason for Sentry to ever meet Galactus if he wasn't consuming a planet.

Unless we believe Nate Grey/Sentry flew into the middle of nowhere to fight Galactus after he just fed.

Please tell me those two are not trying to give Doomsday the win over Galactus 😘 .. You know who they will put up against Galactus next 😆

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Which is retarded to believe considering there's no reason for Sentry to ever meet Galactus if he wasn't consuming a planet.

Unless we believe Nate Grey/Sentry flew into the middle of nowhere to fight Galactus after he just fed.

Since I was simply giving an example of why Sentry stalemating Galactus would be pretty bad for Galactus, instead of arguing that is indeed what happened, especially when I said that I think Sentry was just delusional, what exactly is your point?

Originally posted by Epicurus
The main highlight of your post was "Sentry stalemating Galactus can be quite bad for big G" after that depending on context bit. And biensalsa made that claim as if it was a done deal, pointing out how Galactus "jobbed" to Sentry and Thor.

I was replying to Titan giving the impression that stalemate isn't losing, means it's not a bad showing no matter what. Maybe that's not what he meant, but that's how I read it. I never argued it was a bad showing, I simply argued it could be depending on what happened. If it even did. Which I don't think so.

Originally posted by Peter Parker
Please tell me those two are not trying to give Doomsday the win over Galactus 😘 .. You know who they will put up against Galactus next 😆

This response made me laugh since you clearly have no idea what was actually said.

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Galactus didn't stalemate Thor though in that issue. Galactus almost killed Thor before Ego saved him. Then when Ego was defeated Thor cheapshotted Galactus with a Godblast.

I know this, since you are reading my posts, didn't you read the part where I said "extenuating circumstances"?

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Regained his strength to move again is all that referred to. Because he was laying there with a seizure for almost a full comic. I'd go look for the statements where Thor states his strength fades for a long while after said seizures, but it isn't needed.

Having the New warriors to take over the battle for 15 pages in the next issue IMO qualifies for a "long while" and enough time to recover.

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
But Thor being weakened or not isn't the point. The Godblast has blown through Exitar's dome which was more durable than his outside armor. Almost killed a weakened Galactus. And blew a hole through a being with Odin's power, Perrikus who was said to rival Odin and almost defeated him prior, Zelia who was above Perrikus, and like hundreds of other lesser Dark Gods.
And Juggernaut tanked it. Totally legitimate feat to use for Juggernaut. Let's use solely this feat to downplay the Godblast, because it couldn't possibly be a hundred times more impressive than Juggernaut's next feat.

I don't know why are you getting so offended by this. But if a weakened Galactus (with all the extenuating circumstances involved on that comic) was Godsblasted and then a healthy Juggernaut tanked the blast, I don't see anything bad with it, after all different writers will have different displays of power levels. To me it just means that a weakened (to an unknown degree) Galactus is not a foe that I will brag that I defeated him

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Not you since you consider jobbing to be prevalent in a forum fight.

??? I consider jobbing prevalent in a forum fight? Well where did I said that? I just mentioned that Galactus jobs that does not mean he will loose here.

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Because Doomsday could possibly replicate a God blast because Galactus jobbed to Thor. IYO. Also Juggernaut amirite?

Don't be silly Bran is not like Galactus does not get punched in the face by the likes of Doomsday, or that no writer ever in history will even come up with the idea that you can beat the crap of a weakened Galactus

So pardon me for ever, ever, ever thinking that a Galactus in a unknown weakened state could ever be punched in the face, or stalemated, since it has never, ever, ever happened

ONCE AGAIN This is not what will happen in a forum fight, so you can understand it

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
But yes Galactus stomps if we use depictions of him with absolutely no low showings. He's going to need all the help he can get against Doomsday.

I think the only person needing help here is you, so you can understand the concept. But in comics anything can happen.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
Galactus was weak and the godblast was fortified iirc

I know

Originally posted by Insane Titan
Galactus never jobs to people of Doomsday lvl by getting punched out

That is a blanket statement

Originally posted by Delta1938
I was replying to Titan giving the impression that stalemate isn't losing, means it's not a bad showing no matter what. Maybe that's not what he meant, but that's how I read it. I never argued it was a bad showing, I simply argued it could be depending on what happened. If it even did. Which I don't think so.

K, cool.

Though imo, nobody(and not referring to you here since you didn't bring it up) should ever bring up the Sentry in the same post as Galactus, unless they're referring to one of his delusional periods where he believed that he was Galactus.

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
I know

That is a blanket statement

Then why you that example when Doomsday can't replicate a godblast.

It's true , you may have the very odd occasion with circumstances but any same person knows it's not happening here

Yeah, a weakened Galactus was about to get killed by some ****ing ships which were unable to put down Surfer or Stardust or BRB.

😬

Lol you are truly sad and desperate the length you go to

He's definitely the most despised poster on this forum.

Nah thought that was me lol

Originally posted by Epicurus
K, cool.

Though imo, nobody(and not referring to you here since you didn't bring it up) should ever bring up the Sentry in the same post as Galactus, unless they're referring to one of his delusional periods where he believed that he was Galactus.

Why did that not surprise me?

Originally posted by Insane Titan
Then why you that example when Doomsday can't replicate a godblast.

Certantly no DD can't replicate a Godsblast, but he surely can replicate what Thing did

Originally posted by Insane Titan
It's true , you may have the very odd occasion with circumstances but any same person knows it's not happening here

And I did said that Galactus wins in a forum fight, how many times do I have to repeat that?

In comics is a complete different matter tough.

This argument is a complete waste of time as we agree that in a forum fight Galactus wins, is just that I rattle the cage because I mentioned Galactus jobbing in comics. so :/

Originally posted by Epicurus
K, cool.

Though imo, nobody(and not referring to you here since you didn't bring it up) should ever bring up the Sentry in the same post as Galactus, unless they're referring to one of his delusional periods where he believed that he was Galactus.

😆 You are correct I agree with you 👆

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Certantly no DD can't replicate a Godsblast, but he surely can replicate what Thing did

And I did said that Galactus wins in a forum fight, how many times do I have to repeat that?

In comics is a complete different matter tough.

This argument is a complete waste of time as we agree that in a forum fight Galactus wins, is just that I rattle the cage because I mentioned Galactus jobbing in comics. so :/

how long ago was it that Thing did that though?

It's not like it's ever happened again iirc

Can we let this thread die? Please? Its discusting.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
how long ago was it that Thing did that though?

It's not like it's ever happened again iirc

Thats from FF 243, I think is from the 80's

and I think it has happened afterwards either, though I could not tell for sure and I don't feel like researching it, but I think there is a couple similar to this instance.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
Lol you are truly sad and desperate the length you go to

Yeah, look who is talking?
Originally posted by Epicurus
He's definitely the most despised poster on this forum.

Who gives a damn?

Originally posted by abhilegend
Yeah, look who is talking?
Who gives a damn?
come back to when I lowball at every attempt to prove a point , you're ridiculous the lengths you go to.