Originally posted by soleran30
its even more entertaining to read a post on pot when some people won't cite any facts other then what they think and believe🙂
I wonder who you mean, Could it be "Mr Post Your own opinions and not what you've googled"? What that guy fails to understand is you need to know the keywords to search, well he probably does understand that, which is why he never provides evidence. 😖hifty: 🙂
Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
I wonder who you mean, Could it be "Mr Post Your own opinions and not what you've googled"? What that guy fails to understand is you need to know the keywords to search, well he probably does understand that, which is why he never provides evidence. 😖hifty: 🙂
Yes the secret is out! And I still find it comical🙂 💃
Originally posted by soleran30
Yes the secret is out! And I still find it comical🙂 💃
It is comical my friend 😉.I could discuss potinduced paranoia or how when smoking marijuana, the user may have uncontrollable laughter one minute and paranoia the next. This instant change in emotions has to do with the way that THC affects the brain's limbic system. The limbic system is a region of the brain that governs one's behavior and emotions. It also "coordinates activities between the visceral base-brain and the rest of the nervous system. KD 50 curves and dose response etc but why bother. 😉 Thats modern research by the way. 😉
Whirly, didn't you say you were a physics lecturer or something LIKE that?
Why then do you continually, without fail, use Google copy and pastes in each and every debate you are entered into? Do you not see why I comment on this kind of tactic?
What are your lectures like? "Ok kids, your homework is to go and type 'Pot Facts' into Google." "Sir, we need you to teach us. That's why we're here." "Nah, I-I agree with Google. What you read on there is what I'd say."
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Whirly, didn't you say you were a physics lecturer or something LIKE that?Why then do you continually, without fail, use Google copy and pastes in each and every debate you are entered into? Do you not see why I comment on this kind of tactic?
What are your lectures like? "Ok kids, your homework is to go and type 'Pot Facts' into Google." "Sir, we need you to teach us. That's why we're here." "Nah, I-I agree with Google. What you read on there is what I'd say."
-AC
I don't lecture Physics. Reputable sites on the internet areconsidered good secondary sources, thats why University departments post as do New Scientist, Nature and most specialist generalpublications, you did get to University right?
You say they are secondary sources, which means secondary to your PRIMARY source. Which should be your debate...the debate you never post. You just paste from Google and say "That's my primary opinion and also the secondary source." It doesn't work.
Agree or not, Soleran posts the link alongside a lot of his own words. He doesn't do a Deano and paste everything, then cop out with "I agree, that's my opinion." You do.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
You say they are secondary sources, which means secondary to your PRIMARY source. Which should be your debate...the debate you never post. You just paste from Google and say "That's my primary opinion and also the secondary source." It doesn't work.Agree or not, Soleran posts the link alongside a lot of his own words. He doesn't do a Deano and paste everything, then cop out with "I agree, that's my opinion." You do.
-AC
Evidence should always support you're primary source without it you only have a hypothesis to test. Opinion is fine in speculative debates but on something like pot which can cause paranoia in some which is a fact based on statistics it only takes you so far. Most of the time the generally accepted view is right in Science. Unless you present evidence to discredit it!
Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
Evidence should always support you're primary source without it you only have a hypothesis to test. Opinion is fine in speculative debates but on something like pot which can cause paranoia in some which is a fact based on statistics it only takes you so far.
Exactly, evidence is used to back up an opinion. You go straight to Google, paste and then say "That's my opinion."
Whenever you do post, it's a wave of smileys and desperation "humour" in an attempt to swerve topic. I have no problems debating with anyone here as long as it's civil and just as long as I'm debating with someone, not someone hiding behind Google.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Exactly, evidence is used to back up an opinion. You go straight to Google, paste and then say "That's my opinion."Whenever you do post, it's a wave of smileys and desperation "humour" in an attempt to swerve topic. I have no problems debating with anyone here as long as it's civil and just as long as I'm debating with someone, not someone hiding behind Google.
-AC
desperation humour,I think not! Wheras you use hidden insults. I go straight to google key in the needed phrase which you have to know e.g. Pot "limbic" Paranoia and gain evidence, yup your point is. Wheras you say "I think" and provide nothing. Hmmmm how does that work? Humour used to convey sarcastic point. Did you get it? 😂 Smiley used to convey amusement. Imagine this said in a very slow voice AC for comprehension. 🙂