Originally posted by Deano
im not syaing he will. im saying if he has done it before, he can do it again. and of course he got the goals because southampton played the ball to him, how else are strikers like crouch and michael owen going to score? do you expect him to score from 50 yards or dribble the ball past people? i'll say it for the last time, he is NOT that sort of player. You gotta understand that.
They're poachers, yes. Saying someone is a good poacher is like saying someone's a good murderer.
Originally posted by Deano
how was they lucky? lol. not lucky at all. im amazed you have said that. its a team game, if they are just gonna rely on riquelme then they are in trouble. they have good enough players to see out the game. england would of scored, regardless of whether or not riquelme was on the pitch.
If you'll drop the Mystic Deano schtick for a sec, you can't exactly say they would have. Because they've lost to Northern Ireland before. If them scoring was so certain, they'd be winning a lot more games.
Originally posted by Deano
no im positive, no arguments. bridge was about as fit and sharp as paul gascoigne is at the moment. if he was sharp and up to match speed, then the opposing player woudnt of gotten past him, let alone get past cole. just baffles me to as why sven played him.
Because Sven is the shittest manager ever, to be blunt.
Second, you can be positive all you want. Doesn't mean it wouldn't have happened. People have beat Cole before, the can do so again.
Originally posted by Deano
it is pointless. you are saying england would not of scored if riquelme was on the pitch. which is ridiculous since they scored earlier on when he was playing, plus struck the post. but since you blame that for argentina's loss, i'll say this again. First argentina goal wouldnt of happened if cole was playing, 2nd goal wouldnt have happened if the ref gave the right decision. dont say i cant be sure of that when you are saying you are sure that england wouldnt of won if riquelme stayed on the pitch, you cannot be sure of that either.
Not only because they removed Riquelme but because they had a goal lead. Which meant not only did England have to score to draw, but score two to win. At this point it wasn't looking likely so they chilled out. Their own fault? Yes, I'm not blaming England for Argentina's lapse. I'm saying that if they kept playing as they were, England probably wouldn't have got the two injury time goals. I can't say anything for sure, just what I think is likely.
Originally posted by Deano
argentina are a great team and they will most probably always keep the ball better than england. doesnt mean they are a better side, its what you do with the ball that counts. and england created as many chances as argentina did that day.
Creating chances and taking them are two different things.
-AC