Originally posted by Df02
may be faulty but its what i think it will rest on... Barca with Henry would be the most formidable force in recent football history. He'd win everything there is to win with them.
That's very true and I do agree.
However, we can agree that the English Premier League is the best league in the world (not out of patriotism either), to win it is ALWAYS a challenge really. Will the monotony and boredom of La Liga be enough to tired him over until say, the Champions League? I don't know.
You're right though. Henry, Eto'o, Ronaldinho...striking fear into the hearts of men.
Have Chelsea actually got Ballack?
-AC
It's not as though they had full on, have-to-be-near-a-toilet food poisoning RIGHT then. It must have been shit though and no doubt it did make things harder, but that's the way it goes.
I think Arsenal, either way, deserved the result they got. Even if we didn't get 4th I'd be glad because we won the last game at Highbury, and Henry scored a hat trick.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
It's not as though they had full on, have-to-be-near-a-toilet food poisoning RIGHT then. It must have been shit though and no doubt it did make things harder, but that's the way it goes.I think Arsenal, either way, deserved the result they got. Even if we didn't get 4th I'd be glad because we won the last game at Highbury, and Henry scored a hat trick.
-AC
ok so they werent throwing up on the pitch, but come on man... we were robbed on our last day by it. i firmly beleive we would've beaten west ham had it not been for the food poisoning.
none of them could train properly before the match and had no food or liquid in their stomachs.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I always said I believed West Ham were more than good enough to pull out a draw at the least. I'm not denying that it was a shit for you lot, food poisoning is nasty, but still. I can't know to what degree it effected them or what would have happened anyway.-AC
yes, in the same way every spurs fan considered Wigan a match for Arsenal.... the biased way.
fully fit Tottenham squad would have won that game, we both know that... i men did you watch it? players were running around half hunched over and looked knackered at the end... and we still fought out a narrow loss.
side point did you see Davids throw a hissy fit when Jol was gonna sub him? made him sub Carrick instead. News flash Davids, you're shit thats why he was gonna sub you.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
That was because West Ham have the little matter of the F.A Cup Final Vs Liverpool to attend to.Any team in their right mind would have done the same.
-AC
no i understand that... im just gutted we didnt have a fair crack at our most important game of the season... but it's over now, and we're in the EUFA cup, and in 5th... nothing to turn your nose up at.
Originally posted by mechmoggy
I hate it when people presume to tell me what I'm trying to say...🙄"I was all for Defoe being in the England side at the start of the season, but he's gone off the boil. What other strikers have we got that we could rely on like Owen and Rooney?"
There's a full-stop (period) half way through that sentence, which ends my comment about Defoe being off the boil.
I then go on to ask what strikers are about who are as reliable as Owen and Rooney are. At no point have I said that Owen is off the boil...just not 100% over his injury, according to Sky Sports News.
Perhaps you might like to review what's been said in order to determine where you are having trouble.
You could ask one of my assistants, Al Centauri or YKD for further help.
Haven't got much net access at the moment, what happened in the fourth place battle guys?
I'll go check, hold on.
BAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.