Exar Kun vs. Naga Sadow

Who is a better Sith. I to lazy to type anything more.

Don't know they both sound powerful, they both were... According to Kreia Naga would own. But i'm not to sure about that, i'll just wait around for some other replies before I vote. This should be interesting to see.

Fishy, Naga WOULD win. Hiscontrol of the force, his physical strenght, his will...all of those things are better then Exars. Besides, Sadow was a pure Sith, giving him physical advantage over Kun(human). Yes, i know it took 100(0) jedi to stop Kun, it took the entire jedi order to take out Sadow, and even then, he didnt die by saber hit. His ship was destroyed together with him.

naga wuld win

Originally posted by Naga Sadow
Fishy, Naga WOULD win. Hiscontrol of the force, his physical strenght, his will...all of those things are better then Exars. Besides, Sadow was a pure Sith, giving him physical advantage over Kun(human). Yes, i know it took 100(0) jedi to stop Kun, it took the entire jedi order to take out Sadow, and even then, he didnt die by saber hit. His ship was destroyed together with him.

Still, how many people did he fight in saber combat? and win? HIs powers seem more like a galactic scale like Bastila's battle meditation so I think Exar myself.

Naga is one of the top two Sith Lords, with Ragnos, in my mind. He, I think, would win. All of the reasons here, though, are correct and worth considering, for both sides.

Well, a few things...

First off, Naga Sadow killed any enemies he had with a poisoned blade, not a lightsaber. None of the Korriban Sith other than Tulak lived in a time when the Sith had adopted the lightsaber. Still, Naga Sadow was the leader of a Sith priesthood, and the Sith themselves were strong enough in the Force to impress dark Jedi like Ajunta Pall. Notice the early dark Jedi didn't destroy the Sith but instead assimilated and interbred with them. Sith blood has, to use a modern era example, all the midi-chlorians of Anakin Skywalker and none of the fat.

Now, while Exar Kun was doubtless bursting with power and skill, he simply wasn't as experienced in the dark side or Sith magics as Sadow. His choice of weapon wouldn't be a tremendous advantage either since Ludo Kressh himself used a double bladed sword.

And lastly, no matter who wins, that planet is fekked up.

Ya got that right.

what does it have to doo with the ****in planet it is about fight who gives a **** what wuld happen to a planet?

Calm down, man...
He was just being lighthearted, that's all. I think we're all agreed about the winner.

You're both my homeboys.

ok,,if i dont calm down to the dark side fall i will,,but still i m stronger than that

Amen to that, bro.

Please, no ghetto talk. And second, Naga would win cuz Exar wouldn't be able to use his weapon advantage cuz Naga would just use his control over Sith magic and kill him easily.

Originally posted by Naga Sadow
Fishy, Naga WOULD win. Hiscontrol of the force, his physical strenght, his will...all of those things are better then Exars. Besides, Sadow was a pure Sith, giving him physical advantage over Kun(human). Yes, i know it took 100(0) jedi to stop Kun, it took the entire jedi order to take out Sadow, and even then, he didnt die by saber hit. His ship was destroyed together with him.

As far as I know, Naga didn't die on his ship, his apprentice, Gav Daragon did when he came back from the darkside. I thought that Naga died on Yavin IV. Remember, he was the one who created the Massassi. And I have never heard anything great about Naga's physical strength, it was all about Marka. Also, if Sith have an advantage over humans in regard to the force, why wasn't the chosen one a sith? I know they were all extinct(or were they), but the force could unextinct them if necessary.

The Chosen One is George's idea, not the creation of the EU comics crew. Note they really didn't embrace midi-chlorians either.

And besides, the Sith are more responsive towards an evil regime after all that time of being dominated by dark Sith. The CHosen One couldn't be a Sith because their empire is a representative of what evil brings.

Originally posted by Darth_Janus
...Sith blood has, to use a modern era example, all the midi-chlorians of Anakin Skywalker and none of the fat.

I know your probably exagerating to a degree, but they can't have very much more than normal humans. Think of Anakin Skywalker with all of Revan's knowlege and experince. Although I don't think that Revan has TONS more experince than the other Jedi, I do think it is still really high up there. So we have Anakin, with all of Revan knolege, experince, and genius. We're taling kick a@@ mofo in the making.

SO they cant be that high up because the Republic defeated them. The Republic with lots of NON Sith force users. I don't think Sith are that much better.

Good point. You are completely right. However, I think the Sith lost mostly, not because of the Republic army, but due to their recklessness. Marka Ragnos knew better than to mess with the balance of the force, which down to what this comes. Naga Sadow was too power-hungry and was caught up in taking control. He forgot that the Force can never be completely dominated by good or evil, and thus was absolutely screwed. The whole thing with the Sith losing because of arrogance and/or recklessness seems to be a trend: Naga Sadow, Lord Kaan, Darth Sidious..
The same goes for the Republic losing due to lack of insight.

Well, for a real world example of recklessness can be help ful I will once again go back to my fighting training.

When we a having a group fight with maybe 6 people on each side, my team has a strategy of sending one of us un a on a "sucide" strike to one side of the opposing team. They just go in swingin and can usually take out two before they are "killed". This leaves of with 5 on 4. We can usually win after this. Unfortunatly, this tactic only works against people who are not as good as some of us. This is kind've like how the Sith had fewer people, but they were better individualy than the Republic forces. On average though, the Republics power was more balanced throughout the Jedi and there were also more Jedi. This allowed them to win.

Basicly what I'm saying through all of this is that recklessness can be helpful.

This is also true. It's really circumstantial, so it all depends on the applied situation.

Anyway, rock on, my man.

Well, the true Sith died out because their way of life was dominated by dark Jedi teachings, which we now associate with "being Sith" or "Of the Sith". Hence, Sith have no love for anyone save themselves. No society or empire could prosper on that. The main moral of the story in SW overall is good preserves while evil dissentegrates because of petty ambition.

The true Sith didn't die out because of Republic might, really. They died out because they could not be united. Separate, they were more powerful than any Jedi or Republic citizen. But divided, they fell.