Teen arrested for sexually abusing herself

This is unbelievable

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/webguide/internetlife/2004-03-29-child-self-porn_x.htm

What does it say about the world.

Opinions.

While it's sick. They shouldn't be allowed to arrest someone for doing it to themselves. 😖.

Ah shit that shit just shitty doesn't shit (open) shit.

Oh now it did 🤨 ....there is something wrong with this world...on te one hand that someone does that on the other that she gets arrested what the hell ....tssss

Wow that story was retarded.

This is wrong on so many levels >.<

it's the application of the law to its full potential. I disagree with this however

Originally posted by §pearhead
This is wrong on so many levels >.<

Agreed.

Disturbing, but somehow i'm not really surprised.

But if she was not arrested would it not just be saying, "ok Paedos get the kid to say it was down to them and its all alright?"

😄

nope because I think that even with a minors consent it would still be classified as rape.

No I mean in regards to distribution of pics, not rape etc.

Originally posted by Fire
nope because I [b]think that even with a minors consent it would still be classified as rape. [/B]

I think the same rule applies I doubt a minor can give consent for that

If she was let off, then its a way of safely distributing for pervs all they do is use a teen girl as a front, hence she had to be prosecuted

Originally posted by Fire
I think the same rule applies I doubt a minor can give consent for that

It's considered distributing pornography...She has problems..

Its the only thing we could think of that makes sense, she is distributing child porn

Originally posted by debbiejo
It's considered distributing pornography...She has problems..

voila debbie is right they should take her for that not for sexual abuse

and thats the point I tried to explain a few posts back Fire

Originally posted by Fire
voila debbie is right they should take her for that not for sexual abuse

Originally posted by whirlysplat
If she was let off, then its a way of safely distributing for pervs all they do is use a teen girl as a front, hence she had to be prosecuted

See

True, but I never disagreed to that I just disagreed to the fact that she shouldn't be prosecuted for sexual abuse

Originally posted by Fire
True, but I never disagreed to that I just disagreed to the fact that she shouldn't be prosecuted for sexual abuse