Muhammad Ali or Bruce Lee?

Started by Robtard163 pages
Originally posted by Bardock42
I don't know, I think Van Damme is at least an accomplished fighter in his discipline. He fought competitively, I believe.

Was not aware of this. If he has an actual fight record, that's one over Bruce Lee.

Originally posted by inimalist
iirc he never did well

also, and I could be totally wrong on this as well, but he and lee's style are both heavily strike oriented. I personally feel an acomplished grapple or floor based fighter would have a much easier time with Ali, and would probably give them the majority /10

Wikipedia says he has a 18-1 fight record with 18 KOs and the lost being a split decision. Also he was European Team Champion. So I think he was pretty succesful in that field, of course no comparison to Ali's accomplishments.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Wikipedia says he has a 18-1 fight record with 18 KOs and the lost being a split decision. Also he was European Team Champion. So I think he was pretty succesful in that field, of course no comparison to Ali's accomplishments.

wow, my bad completely

Wow, with his identical Twin brotherdamme, thats like 36-2..! 😉

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Wow, with his identical Twin brotherdamme, thats like 36-2..! 😉

Therefore, we can easily conclude, Van Damme could kick Ali's ass.

Well those guys need to multiply again to do THAT..

And even then, Ali would freakishly find a way to beat 'em, most likely. 😛

Oh yeah, I call in Timecop; he goes back and beats five shades of shit out of Ali, back when Ali's a toddler and still going by the name Cassius.

lol You might get him then.

I wonder who he lost to.

Originally posted by inimalist
there are 143 pages, thats a fairly evasive tactic at this point ddm

That or I don't feel like searching the thread myself. 😐

What's 143 pages when this is obviously important to them?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Indeed. Seems to be his new M.O.

That or I've grown tired of moronic questions that have been answered and it would only take 5 minutes of searching with the search feature to find the answer you are looking for? Just a thought. 😐

K.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
K.

That's right, pwned. 😮‍💨

Not at all. Just answer his question.

Originally posted by dadudemon
That's right, pwned. 😮‍💨

😆

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Not at all. Just answer his question.

Use the search feature. 🙂

K.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Use the search feature. 🙂

What query would you recommend?

Originally posted by Bardock42
What query would you recommend?

After you figure that out, let us know.

Edit -

LOL!

I found everything I was talking about in, not five minutes or even one minute, but 30 seconds. I actually started to copy and past each post into my edit....but....

No way am I going to look this up for you guys when you can find it yourself, no problem.

Originally posted by dadudemon
After you figure that out, let us know.

Edit -

LOL!

I found everything I was talking about in, not five minutes or even one minute, but 30 seconds. I actually started to copy and past each post into my edit....but....

No way am I going to look this up for you guys when you can find it yourself, no problem.

Mhm.

Originally posted by dadudemon
That or I don't feel like searching the thread myself. 😐

What's 143 pages when this is obviously important to them?

That or I've grown tired of moronic questions that have been answered and it would only take 5 minutes of searching with the search feature to find the answer you are looking for? Just a thought. 😐


dadudemon, be reasonable here. Many an argument was constructed and reconstructed in here. Threads of this type are prone to that. For example, the dialogue you just had with Robtard is hardly the first of its kind. Those points, from either side, were addressed multiple times in the past. While it is possible you undertook the noble endeavor of breaking that chain, it is highly unlikely; as of now, you only seem to fear a rebuttal.
Originally posted by dadudemon
After you figure that out, let us know.

Edit -

LOL!

I found everything I was talking about in, not five minutes or even one minute, but 30 seconds. I actually started to copy and past each post into my edit....but....

No way am I going to look this up for you guys when you can find it yourself, no problem.


Come now, I requoted myself just a few pages ago. If my opposition wishes to address something specific, I don't mind reiterating a point if it helps the discussion.

Obviously, you aren't required to do absolutely anything we say; however, taking our advice would be a boon to you as far as the discussion is concerned. Whether you realize it or not, your actions now only hinder progress and undermine your stance.

It's a shame really. Several people are willing to give your point fair consideration. You need only type it.

Or quote it.

Or like.....make a commercial. That'd cost money though and is probably far past the point most are willing to take this issue. Why would you even think of that in the first place?