Originally posted by Freaky Zeeky
Like I was saying, Ali would win cause he beat George Foreman and ranks up with Frazier and Sugar Ray. Which all three can kill Bruce. Simple.
😄
ali also lost to henry cooper 😉
ali beat boxers..lets see him try and beat bruce...woudnt happen
i dont wanna argue about this no more...each to their own
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Could be worse though right? I could be such a one-trick pony that I continually assume your pride is hurt and that you're offended. Oh wait, isn't that what you continually do to me? Yep. Seems you've come quite unstuck.Technicality doesn't equate to intelligence. If you complicate your words for the sake of it, you're less intelligent than someone who realises that simplicity is the best approach in such a discussion. Surely you would have known that Mr. C-?
-AC
No you misunderstand again 🙄 The reason for your C- was the lack of use of appropriate and relevant terminology to describe concepts at the heart of the MJ case; like corroboration, reasonable doubt, 12 men good and just, the rule of law etc. Ideas which underpin your argument and give it both weight and relevance. Look, sorry I went to fast for you 😕 I know................................. heres a new ball, please don't keep giving them away, you really need one at times like this and the C-, forget it just chalk it up to a learning experience. You can do better next time.
Target for improvement for AC use of relevant: concepts and terminology in non truncated form with explanations in future discussions.
Simple isn't always best, as the rest of your village keep telling you😄 Ask Deano what I mean, it might not translate across the atlantic 🙂
Keep bouncing that ball 😄
Keep the faith 😇
Keep it Whirly 🤘
wat the hell are u talkin about henry cooper lost to ali because ali almost knocked his eye out and yes foreman and ali and tyson can beat his ass and im done arguin about this beef we had i dont feel like gettin banned for u so... and wat do u mean u dnot wanna talk about it anymore this forum is for this quarry so take ur personal life somewhere else
Originally posted by kyllacam
wat the hell are u talkin about henry cooper lost to ali because ali almost knocked his eye out and yes foreman and ali and tyson can beat his ass and im done arguin about this beef we had i dont feel like gettin banned for u so... and wat do u mean u dnot wanna talk about it anymore this forum is for this quarry so take ur personal life somewhere else
we are goin around in circles
theres no point in keep arguin about who wud win..u say ali..i say bruce
the end
Originally posted by whirlysplat
No you misunderstand again 🙄 The reason for your C- was the lack of use of appropriate and relevant terminology to describe concepts at the heart of the MJ case; like corroboration, reasonable doubt, 12 men good and just, the rule of law etc. Ideas which underpin your argument and give it both weight and relevance. Look, sorry I went to fast for you 😕 I know................................. heres a new ball, please don't keep giving them away, you really need one at times like this and the C-, forget it just chalk it up to a learning experience. You can do better next time.
That's very pretty and I'm sure the lessers here at KMC are impressed, but it doesn't ACTUALLY work with me. Sorry.
I could have used all the jargon and gone pointlessly off topic but the purpose of my posts was to get my point across as universally as possible, whilst being understood by those in the debate. I accomplished those things. Had I gone in there trying to be a pretentious, glass-stomached fool, I would have boosted my own ego (as you appear to be doing) but I wouldn't have made things very clear now would I?
So if you really feel a sense of satisfaction from pulling the old "Watch me throw random intelligence claims out there and then claim I'm confusing him" trick out of your baseball cap, then by all means continue to do so. It shows nothing other than your inability to produce fresh information. Lest we forget, you've posted nothing (to me) but rehashed scientific irrelevance and off topic, pseudo-intellectual jibes.
Doesn't make you look cool or smart, but then I'm logical.
Originally posted by whirlysplat
Target for improvement for AC use of relevant: concepts and terminology in non truncated form with explanations in future discussions.Simple isn't always best, as the rest of your village keep telling you😄 Ask Deano what I mean, it might not translate across the atlantic 🙂
Keep bouncing that ball
Keep the faith
Keep it Whirly
Tsk, silly. I don't bounce the ball myself 😉. I give them to....ohhohoh....I see what you did. So sharp. What a clever, smart human being you must be, to come up with something like that. Implying that I am one of the people I regularly give the ball to, thus turning my very own joke against me. Pfft, I...well I'm stunned. Clever.
My hilarious sarcasm aside though, you're not saying anything I'm unaware of. Sorry.
Across the other side of the atlantic? Well well well. For someone so self-indulgent and with such a high level of self-proclaimed intelligence, you just made an awfully large (and false) assumption.
On topic for once: I merely stated that calling Bruce Lee a man of little power, is stupid. I believed so then, I believe so now. If all you can do is reply in the manner you continue to, then it says alot about you.
You sir, have wizard syndrome. By that I mean that behind the curtain that is your pseudo-intelligent veil, there is no all seeing being.
Disappointing 🙁.
-AC