Street Fighter vs Mortal Kombat vs Killer Instinct

Tanks for the support whirly

I said akuma stomped the earth and it shook,destroying meteors,are not efficient to you because you don't know and you love mk way too much. to see. the ignorant trumpet blares the loudest, you said you were doing research.

Seeing as these characters of SF can destroy islands and break tidal waves with their energy blast the army is history, and stop using them because we are referring to the main char.

If you want to play that way, bison has armies to, and a super psycho crusher is to much for these guys, and bison uses mind control, making those unkillable soldiers work against mk.

I think the only person capable of holding up the mortal kombat team would be shang tsung

these people still see the likes of street fighter characters as pushovers, just because they don't have god, half-dragon, dragon, and sorcerer's in their title.

Originally posted by SaTsuJiN
I think the only person capable of holding up the mortal kombat team would be shang tsung

Sub Zero can freeze someone and end the fight there
Scorpion, basically can't die (ge's come back waay too much lol) and a kickass fighter

I think that's not only shang tsung. Also, that team is not MK's best. It doesn't even include Kung Lao! Besides, who would really hold up the SF team? Only Ryu and Ken really. I'm not saying that MK would win, SF would probably win simply because the creators overexagerated their very unoriginal and totally not creative powers by soo much that the whole game is about special moves. Basically SF=Video Game version of DBZ. But what I'm trying to say is, in terms of combat (hand to hand) Street Fighter has nothing, they just have their overused, over exagerated special moves.

man mk is the most baloney ina fighting game, bison would hold up fine, and akuma wasn't quite mentioned, take off guile

besides for subzero there is a guy called glacius.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
man mk is the most baloney ina fighting game

From where do you get that? Because it's not a button masher game where if you know more specials you'll win like SF is? Or is it because it doesn't have childish, cartoony graphics? MK is much better game play wise and takes much more skill. And you keep bringing up that Akuma can destroy islands. Well, guess what? Akuma's not in this. And "for subzero there is a guy called glacius" neither is he. MK would hold itself against SF. You consider SF to be more powerful, yet you hav no proof. IMO, it would be a close battle with KI doing little damage (they only have like one good fighter)

No this is why rookie, you prove like almost anyone else you know nothing of KI, I own 3MK games, 5SF games (2 crossovers), and KI, I beat them regurlaraly. though i actually said I would give Deception a 4/5 anyday, though the characters can be lame.:

MK has button mashing by far, piss poor collision detection, and has no character depth at all , all char take the same damage, (exept bosses) there's no true balance, just use scorpion and sub zero because they have the best projeciles. Dial up combos, thats button mashing, anyone will tell you that the new mk games have it, though mk dug itself from a pit, it has a long way to go before it is even CONSIDERED a hardcore fighting game, it is just a Super Smash bro's with blood, and the specials can be abused, Noob Smoke and characters like him own the game, period.Most of the styles, are just fillers for the

Street Fighter: not perfect, and sometimes repetitive, it is a more respected game for a reason. There is a character for everybody and there is fast slow , weak strong moves. Timing is before actual move mastery , as this game needs millisecond timing. There's block , parry, air cancels, move switches, and a plethora of innovation in your combos, you can make a forum on the fighting strategies, and among other things in the game. You won't button mash against a more experienced player, or you will be beaten, and there is more to have you come back, maybe you are thinking of SF2 the old one. Graphics don't make a game, if you believe that you shouldn't be here.

Like I said I love all three, regardless SF char have blown up Islands, ryu and ken can take this, and Chun li tore up tanks, bison is overkill, and if you think otherwise you are simply seeing game char where they do simple stuff, and heed your own teams advice, seeing as they brought up dragon king and stupid armies.

Fatalities, don't make a game better unless you are 5.

The characters in SF are stronger, all games can be button mashers, if thats how you play streetfighter you can't be that good😄

Originally posted by Fantazy
From where do you get that? Because it's not a button masher game where if you know more specials you'll win like SF is? Or is it because it doesn't have childish, cartoony graphics? MK is much better game play wise and takes much more skill. And you keep bringing up that Akuma can destroy islands. Well, guess what? Akuma's not in this. And "for subzero there is a guy called glacius" neither is he. MK would hold itself against SF. You consider SF to be more powerful, yet you hav no proof. IMO, it would be a close battle with KI doing little damage (they only have like one good fighter)

Unless its like #2, but thats so cheap its hardly funny, even for an expert,

KI: great game especially for its time , and is still seen as one of the best ever. Mixes sf and mk, with lovable characters finishers, humiliations, and a customable combo system with breakers, has many characters and different tases, though much better at the arcades.

Originally posted by Fantazy
From where do you get that? Because it's not a button masher game where if you know more specials you'll win like SF is? Or is it because it doesn't have childish, cartoony graphics? MK is much better game play wise and takes much more skill. And you keep bringing up that Akuma can destroy islands. Well, guess what? Akuma's not in this. And "for subzero there is a guy called glacius" neither is he. MK would hold itself against SF. You consider SF to be more powerful, yet you hav no proof. IMO, it would be a close battle with KI doing little damage (they only have like one good fighter)

Are you serious. 😕 Balrog at the begining of SF K.O'd an elephant with one blow (the comic he racked a car with one punch) and Ryu went toe to toe with this guy, he even did one of his special moves called the Gigaton Blow on Ryu and he still got up and won. Zangief jump in an F-5 tonado and survived without a scratch, all he learned from doing that is another move. They are way more powerful then that now.

It takes just as much skill to play SF and KI like MK too. MK is childish too; like when Sub-zero uses his freeze attack and the characters get frozen in mid air or Scorpions spear stills hits the characters in the neck even when they're fliping. 😕

I love you.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
I love you.

😂 😂 😂

don't make me feel bad.

can i love you too ? 😆

Originally posted by dvampire
Are you serious. 😕 Balrog at the begining of SF K.O'd an elephant with one blow (the comic he racked a car with one punch) and Ryu went toe to toe with this guy, he even did one of his special moves called the Gigaton Blow on Ryu and he still got up and won. Zangief jump in an F-5 tonado and survived without a scratch, all he learned from doing that is another move. They are way more powerful then that now.

Um, look at the teams. Do you see any of those char other than ryu in there? NO! Therefore, saying that King Kong can do such and such doesn't make the SF team win if King Kong isn't even on the frickin' team! I said that the MK team would old up against the SF team, do you even read threads or posts you reply in?

It takes just as much skill to play SF and KI like MK too. MK is childish too; like when Sub-zero uses his freeze attack and the characters get frozen in mid air or Scorpions spear stills hits the characters in the neck even when they're fliping. 😕

And that makes it childish? Do you even know what childish means?

And I admit I have never played KI, so I had no idea, I was assuming based on what has been said in this thread. Anyways if you think it's scorpion and subzero have the best projectiles then you are the rookie. If scorpion misses he stands there for a couple hours, free hit anyone? Sub-Zero's projectile is far too slow. Anyways, the only button masher in the MK series are the newest. Classic MK was WAY MORE than considered a hardcore fighting game.

The characters in SF are stronger, all games can be button mashers, if thats how you play streetfighter you can't be that good

I'm no SF king, I don't play the game my whole life, but I'm pretty damn good at it, as in I can beat it with almost all the char in every game (not the newer 3-D sf though, I've never played those). Just because your reflexes aren't good enough to button mash (as in not even know what your pressing) doesn't mean that nobody's are. n MK I can't do that, in SF, I attack too quickly for them and eventually do one of the kickass specials through button mashing.

you would never win against a pro fighter or even against an expert fighter

Originally posted by Hoshi
you would never win against a pro fighter or even against an expert fighter

That's true! 😄

Originally posted by Hoshi
you would never win against a pro fighter or even against an expert fighter

u have a very good point

dont you agree with me ?

Hey fantazy, no offense but what characters are you mashing with.

Ehonda and chun li have rapid button press specials, and you recover from dizziness by pressing buttons faster.

Truth is, sf has more depth and unlike quick party games like SSB, you can tell the rookie from the best, like I said, you wont win against an expert by simply knowing specials.I honestly shoot 50 messatsu gou hados consecutivly on the ps controller yet lost to my cousin who had bison, and simply blocked and timed my attacks, though he loses all the time now.