Darth Maul vs Anakin (end of ROTS)

Started by playa12585 pages

Anakin destroys Maul.

Originally posted by playa1258
Anakin destroys Maul.
Based on ?

Anakin kicks his ass pretty handily.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Maul defeated him via skill and was cut in half due to taunting his opponent. Anakin ebevr held any kind of advantage over Kenobi. Anakin lost despite Kenobi pleading with him not to be an idiot. He chose to be an idiot.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Iyo. What's relevant is Kenobi won and you can't change that. your excuse making won't change the facts.

^ like you did catch that I was satirizing you, right?

Originally posted by The Ellimist
^ like you did catch that I was satirizing you, right?
Kenobi didn't get lucky that is the thing. Anakin made a tactical error and Kenobi's skill earned him a stalemate up to that point. Unlike against Maul Kenobi was never disarmed via skill. Yw. 🙂

Originally posted by NTJack0
Anakin kicks his ass pretty handily.
Based on ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Kenobi didn't get lucky that is the thing. Anakin made a tactical error and Kenobi's skill earned him a stalemate up to that point. Unlike against Maul Kenobi was never disarmed via skill. Yw. 🙂

So you can bring in circumstances, but when others do, you just dismiss them with a vague one liner and don't even bother to articulate any rebuttals?

Originally posted by The Ellimist
So you can bring in circumstances, but when others do, you just dismiss them with a vague one liner and don't even bother to articulate any rebuttals?
I never ignored the circumstances what I did ignore was the excuses made for why such and such didn't happen.

😐

Ok, I'm not going to bother.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
😐

Ok, I'm not going to bother.

I ignored the excuses just as if someone said the reason Dooku didn't beat Anakin then reasons. That's ignoring the facts and their fight. Dooku didn't lose because Anakin got lucky he was throughly decimated in a short light saber duel with Anakin. But any fanboy will argue based off other showings and try to overtake the facts with their opinion. That's the difference.