What I actually hate most is that I heard somewhere that George Lucas said something like: They are films for kids the fans just can't admit it (I am pretty sure it was not on Supershadow), if he really said that its outrageous......all the fans know that the stupid PT he did was for kids ... but the OT never was ... I actually don'T like George Lucas that much anyways......
Originally posted by WindDancer
Soooo did you like BB Bardock?
I thought that there are only two redeming scenes in AOTC: Obi-Wan vs. Jango and Yoda vs.Dooku(short as it was). Of course TPm is at the same level if not worse and its only redemming scene was the end duel.
I think that the movies should be reorganised so that I and II are a duology, III is by it self, and IV-VI should be left the way they are.
Originally posted by general-pain
I thought that there are only two redeming scenes in AOTC: Obi-Wan vs. Jango and Yoda vs.Dooku(short as it was). Of course TPm is at the same level if not worse and its only redemming scene was the end duel.I think that the movies should be reorganised so that I and II are a duology, III is by it self, and IV-VI should be left the way they are.
Almost nothing changed between II and III except that Natalie got woese and the script of II was better......
Originally posted by Bardock42
Oh definately...was great.....very well done, ..... I actually believed this to be possible (more than Batm,an and Robin at least) , I mean some minor changes from the original story are not that bad (like Ra's Al Ghul training him, or his parents and him watching Bats instead of Zorro (is that even up ton date?)) ...oh by the way, if you haven't seen this movie yet, don't read the previous sentence (thanks to Maddox for this great joke)
All in all, it had great actors that did great acting and I very much enjoyed this film (ok I have to say I watrched Batman and Robbin the previous day, but the BB was still great)
😄
Originally posted by Bardock42
Almost nothing changed between II and III except that Natalie got woese and the script of II was better......
the thing that annoyed me was that Natalie almost ruined the whole PT her performancees in all three movies were awful. hayden was bad in II but i think he improved in ROTS.
Originally posted by Yuxa
im sick of getting ban for postin my comments.
you moderators are full of shit!@
Go **** yourselves and **** this forums!~
and you batman fans can stick your gayass bat up your asses! GOOD BYE!
Well, gee, Wally!
Don't let the Bat-door hit you in the Bat-ass on the way Bat-out...😕
Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
Well, gee, Wally!Don't let the Bat-door hit you in the Bat-ass on the way Bat-out...😕
Batowned I'd say......
Originally posted by WindDancer
True, and the movie was about Darth Vader. Is like when ppl complain about Katie Holmes in BB. I mean the movie is about Batman not about Katie's performance.
Hmm Katie was decent in BB but she had the right amount of Screentime...so did Natalie, its just that her actiung wasn't as good as Katies....Although it got Worse from movie to movie....it was just really really bad in III.....Hayden imporved...yes but not enough to make the m ovie better, ok iot had more action and all but thats the only positive point for it.....
Originally posted by Yuxa
im sick of getting ban for postin my comments.
you moderators are full of shit!@
Go **** yourselves and **** this forums!~
and you batman fans can stick your gayass bat up your asses! GOOD BYE!
You, sir, are an idiot....