Michael Jackson Trial Discussion

thats me...a coward

every time i think you might be cool, you turn all obnoxious and pretensions

you compained about it being mentioned in the other thread..now your complaing becuase its been made into a thread so people don't talk about it in the court case thread..

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
This is a thread to discuss his case, not his punctuality.

Secondly, I believe he didn't coz there's NOTHING to prove he did. You believe he did, and will continue to, despite an acquition. Based on what? "He'll never get convicted even if he IS one, we'll never know". Quite cowardly. Anyone can say that about ANY crime. I'm sure you don't say "He could still be a murderer" to every murder case.

-AC

anyway, hiding behind the phrase 'innocent until proven guilty' is also 'cowardly' in that it is also a blanket statement to help you 'win'. you can also say that for ANY crime, and unless you have the evidence in YOUR hands nobody can argue that.

i argue towards his behavior and you squawk the constitution like a parrot.
well i'm not the court of law, i am an observer, and i call as i see.
deal with it and quit being a hypocrite...its so damn irritating

Show me where I said "PVS you coward" please.

-AC

whatever dude, you must think your the only one who can decipher your own left handed slaps

Considering only a quarter of that post was regarding the arrest I questioned it.

If that's what is to be discussed, good.

-AC

Let's not throw labels around.

Show me where I called you one or don't bring it up. Saying you used a cowardly technique doesn't mean I'm calling you a coward. If I wanted to I would.

-AC

apparently i'm not allowed to discuss it in the other thread

will you two stop bitching at each other..i don't think this thread is about your petty grievances with each other

why not just merge the jackson court threads?

I have absolutely no grievances with PVS at all.

-AC

fine then:

Originally posted by PVS
anyway, hiding behind the phrase 'innocent until proven guilty' is also 'cowardly' in that it is also a blanket statement to help you 'win'. you can also say that for ANY crime, and unless you have the evidence in YOUR hands nobody can argue that.

i argue towards his behavior and you squawk the constitution like a parrot.
well i'm not the court of law, i am an observer, and i call as i see.
deal with it and quit being a hypocrite...its so damn irritating

please forgive the irritation but you throw stones from a glass house

I'm not hiding behind innocent till proven guilty. He's got nothing that proves him to be guilty. If the evidence was mounting up and it was undeniable, I'd think differently. I don't have any reason to believe he is guilty.

You argue towards his behaviour? Such as what? You made vicious assumptions. "Is it not f*cking obvious he's a paedophile?". Come on now.

You call as you see? See what though? You've seen as much as I have and you're calling the man a paedophile.

I'm no hypocrite, you're just trying to twist my words for your own benefit, picking out things that aren't there to try and make me seem faulty.

I'm not gonna get into me Vs you coz that's irrelevant.

-AC

i will say again, its not my place to deliver a verdict.
i just use common sense and deduct my own belief. you may choose to
believe that i fall for public fanaticism, but its really just how i view it, and if 99.9% of the people agreed with you, i would still stand my ground on this.

his pattern of behavior is seriously questionable in that he is compulsory. think about it, what do you LOVE to do...anything...video games...snowboarding...whatever...something that you just love to do and hope you never have to stop...

NOW you find out the the public cant stand that you do this correct? so you do it anyway...f*** em right?

AND THEN it turns out that your very freedom is on the line for what you view as being completely innocent. what do you do?

as for me, i would just cease, regardless. why? because i dont need it (whatever) to live, i would be miserable without it...but i would be in hell if i was sent to jail. common sense would prevail, however unjust it would be that i give up something innocent that i love...

...unless i couldnt...unless i was addicted...compulsive

AC, its obvious that MJ CANT stop. he HAS to sleep and play with small children. its not a preference in befriending kids, its a NECESSITY.
why would any sane man put his life on the line just to play tea party with a bunch of toddlers?

.damn double post 😮

i just requested a merge

See, when you do that, it's easier to understand you. Thanks for clearing it up.

You have your view which I trust you deduced by yourself, whether I think it's BS or not, your opinion is yours, that's fine.

Situations would suggest he's compulsive however, it still stands that if he really has done NOTHING wrong then he doesn't have anything to worry about, see what I'm saying? He can't be jailed for hanging with kids.

-AC

I will go down with this ship!

Oh well. Everyone go to my Hell House thread. It's a lot more interesting.

Did he actually get arrested or was it just a threat?

I don't know when he actually made it to the court room.

AC, we live in a free country, but that term is meaningless.
innocent people fry all the time, and he's had to pay out millions in
hush money out of fear of a 'guilty' verdict. he knows what he is risking.

the only time i hear of people persisting with any behavior which could potentially end their lives...addiction is involved.