Who is the strongest Dark Lord?

Started by GM Nebaris26 pages

Damn, I forgot about Tulak, or Ajunta Pall.

Marka Ragnos

Originally posted by zephiel7
Marka Ragnos
Originally posted by Darth Sexy

Prove it.

Edit: Why the hell isn't that quote working?

We don't quote quotes on this forum.
And perhaps Sexy should bump the Ragnos thread!

Originally posted by overlord
We don't quote quotes on this forum.
And perhaps Sexy should bump the Ragnos thread!

I'd just like to see DS prove up his point.

Escape, why is it out of the myriad of people that said "ragnos", you're directing the burden of proof on me, again?

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Escape, why is it out of the myriad of people that said "ragnos", you're directing the burden of proof on me, again?

Because you've confessed that Palpatine possesses "more knowledge", and we've not seen Ragnos do anything on par with a Force Storm. To top it off, you support Ragnos, so yes - I place the burden of proof to you because of your blatant contradictions.

Mr. Revan-Fanboy Zephiel may also provide proof.

Blatant contradictions? Show me? I confessed Sidious possesses more knowledge? I specifically remember arguing against that theory today.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Blatant contradictions? Show me? I confessed Sidious possesses more knowledge? I specifically remember arguing against that theory today.

Taken from Page 3 of my thread in the versus section:

As for him knowing more than them, not sure if that's quite accurate considering that he got EVERYTHING from them and created more. Then again that might mean he knows more.

Furthermore, notice how crappy your logic is, please.

"He got everything from them, and then created more, but that doesn't necessarily means that he knows more."

Lol. I guess it does. 😉

how is that a contradiction? Or crappy logic? I said that it might mean that he knew more, as in stating my personal opinion as though I'm not sure, what's your point? I'm sure you've argued for one thing months ago while arguing completely against it now, should I tell you that you're contradicting yourself, or just changing your opinion?

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
how is that a contradiction? Or crappy logic? I said that it might mean that he knew more, as in stating my personal opinion as though I'm not sure, what's your point? I'm sure you've argued for one thing months ago while arguing completely against it now, should I tell you that you're contradicting yourself, or just changing your opinion?

Rofl. Look at it again!

You've just said:

As for him knowing more than them, not sure if that's quite accurate considering that he got EVERYTHING from them and created more. Then again that might mean he knows more.

You just said that he (Palpatine) got everything from them (Ancient Sith) and then created more (techniques). And then you say, "that doesn't mean that he knows more than they do."

That means he does!

If he knew everything that they did and created more - it means that he knows more than they did!

Originally posted by Escape81
Rofl. Look at it again!

You've just said:

You just said that he (Palpatine) got [B]everything from them (Ancient Sith) and then created more (techniques). And then you say, "that doesn't mean that he knows more than they do."

That means he does!

If he knew everything that they did and created more - it means that he knows more than they did! [/B]

Are you having trouble reading today? I just explained myself for your post consisting of telling me I am contradicting myself. I specifically said that my opinion can change, your opinion can change, etc.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Are you having trouble reading today? I just explained myself for your post consisting of telling me I am contradicting myself. I specifically said that my opinion can change, your opinion can change, etc.

You're not understanding.

You've contradicted yourself in that very statement. You admitted, in that very statement, that Palpatine knew it all and created more. And then, in the next sentence, you said that it doesn't mean that he knew more.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
how is that a contradiction? Or crappy logic? I said that it might mean that he knew more, as in stating my personal opinion as though I'm not sure, what's your point? I'm sure you've argued for one thing months ago while arguing completely against it now, should I tell you that you're contradicting yourself, or just changing your opinion?

Show me what I am not understanding from that statement I posted in response to your "contradiction" statement.

Originally posted by Escape81
You're not understanding.

You've contradicted yourself in that very statement. You admitted, in that very statement, that Palpatine knew it all and created more. And then, in the next sentence, you said that it doesn't mean that he knew more.

No no, you're not understanding. I was explaining my "contradictory" statement and how my view has changed since I made it, please read it again, thanks.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
No no, you're not understanding. I was explaining my "contradictory" statement and how my view has changed since I made it, please read it again, thanks.

You contradicted yourself in that statement. In that statement, you claimed one thing and then claimed the exact opposite. You fail to realize that if: Palpatine knew it all and created more, then he knew more than the Ancient Sith.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Blatant contradictions? Show me? I confessed Sidious possesses more knowledge? I specifically remember arguing against that theory today.

Did you not read that part?

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Did you not read that part?

Did you not read where you said:

He got everything from them and then created more?