why are people saying stuff like oh scine said there'd be dust on the moon yeah so science is wrong sometimes, but the thought that the earth is only around 5000 years is just stupid, there giving a specific time and it's wrong, for god sakes people that means dinosaurs were around only 4000 years ago, it's so inaccurate it's funny 😆
If the earth was actually millions and millions of years old as science SPECULATES then by now it would have been destroyed by the science of probability and odds.
Without God to protect it and only science to defend us from the millions of rocks floating through space the earth is similar to an ant in comparison to size and the likeliness of being crushed by something much larger.
It's a little bit ridiculous to assume that the earth has been spared by luck alone long enough for EVERYTHING to evolve into what it is today utilizing millions and millions of years.
That's like saying an ant with a lifespan of 5,000,000 years can cover every square inch of land on a continent and it's LUCK will keep it from being crushed by the billions of things that are large enough to bring about it's UNTIMELY END.
Time is something that we, being finite, can not truly comprehend not being a factor that applies to EVERYTHING we are FAMILIAR with.
I'm guessing that the earth was created as fully mature as Adam was, for he was in full maturity and the infancy wasn't neccesary. That confounds science because time is part of scientific analysis.
It's a little bit ridiculous to assume that the earth has been spared by luck alone long enough for EVERYTHING to evolve into what it is today utilizing millions and millions of years.who said it has been spared, and since we are in on ridiculose, a god?
I'm guessing that the earth was created as fully mature as Adam was, for he was in full maturity and the infancy wasn't neccesary. That confounds science because time is part of scientific analysissounds like your faith aint all that strong since you are guessing
Originally posted by XxoooxX
Since the bible was writen when they didin't know how old the earth was, they probibly just guessed. They were way off
Originally posted by The MISTER
If the earth was actually millions and millions of years old as science SPECULATES then by now it would have been destroyed by the science of probability and odds.Without God to protect it and only science to defend us from the millions of rocks floating through space the earth is similar to an ant in comparison to size and the likeliness of being crushed by something much larger.
It's a little bit ridiculous to assume that the earth has been spared by luck alone long enough for EVERYTHING to evolve into what it is today utilizing millions and millions of years.
That's like saying an ant with a lifespan of 5,000,000 years can cover every square inch of land on a continent and it's LUCK will keep it from being crushed by the billions of things that are large enough to bring about it's UNTIMELY END.
Time is something that we, being finite, can not truly comprehend not being a factor that applies to EVERYTHING we are FAMILIAR with.
I'm guessing that the earth was created as fully mature as Adam was, for he was in full maturity and the infancy wasn't neccesary. That confounds science because time is part of scientific analysis.
The earth has been hit many of times.I saw a show on astroids and I think the last major hit was in the 19th century(could be wrong).The earth is able to heal itself fairly well though oppossed to the moon which realy can't.
Originally posted by mr.smiley
The earth has been hit many of times.I saw a show on astroids and I think the last major hit was in the 19th century(could be wrong).The earth is able to heal itself fairly well though oppossed to the moon which realy can't.
Yesterday NASA hit a comet a real BIG BANG.....It would poof....good experiment for a real threat!!!
Originally posted by fintiDo you know the definition of spared? obviously not.
who said it has been spared, and since we are in on ridiculose, a god?sounds like your faith aint all that strong since you are guessing
Guessing goes hand in hand with not knowing everything. I guess you don't know what a theory is either right along with not knowing the definition of faith.
That's ok though, nobody's perfect. 😮💨
Do you know the definition of spared? obviously not.you know the history of this earth obviously not
Guessing goes hand in hand with not knowing everything. I guess you don't know what a theory is either right along with not knowing the definition of faith.I guess you aint all that smart.........😄
If you know a thing you know it, if you guessing you might be wrong wich means you dont know it.
faith so what definition do you want , the one where it is synonomus with belief and trust, the allegiance one or just the plain one
Originally posted by finti
you know the history of this earth obviously notI guess you aint all that smart.........😄
what a load a crap I delt with theorys and the likes while you were still in diapers.If you know a thing you know it, if you guessing you might be wrong wich means you dont know it.
faith so what definition do you want , the one where it is synonomus with belief and trust, the allegiance one or just the plain one
The reason that I said guess in my first post is because I don't know the 100% history of the earth.
I really could care less how old you are I know that YOU don't know the 100% history of the earth either.
For you to imply that you DO know the 100% history of the earth despite not having been around for over 1000 years just shows a level of arrogance because I KNOW you can't even name someone who DOES know the 100% history of the earth.
You are making guesses as well but have enough faith in your guesses to state them as facts. No matter how educated a guess is it still remains a guess.
Also I don't see what difference it makes that you have dealt with theories before because there are some that you can't prove or disprove.
I'll continue to say "I guess" on things that I'm not absolutely positive about because I wouldn't want to accidentally mislead anyone.
If you desire, you can say "I know" about things that you're not absolutely positive about.
We all have a free will, right? 😮💨
so what you did here was just continue onto what I already mentioned
Also I don't see what difference it makes that you have dealt with theories before because there are some that you can't prove or disprove.your question was
. I guess you don't know what a theory is either right along with not knowing the definition of faith.so suddenly you stray away from the original assumption you had, but then again maybe you can guess your way to the rest............
I guess that your last post was supposed to make sense...
And like I stated before I KNOW better than to believe everything a man may say simply because he also says he knows everything.
I have faith in my fellow man but I place more faith in my creator. The simple reason is because men are constantly changing their beliefs, facts, theories, traditions, and ideals.
Since no man is perfect then how can I believe in what a man presents to me as perfect?
For something to be considered to be perfect there must be an example of perfection to compare it to. Almost doesn't count and the difference between perfection and imperfection is as staggering as the difference between finite and infinite.
Many people try to say that the Bible isn't perfect and have gathered evidence to prove it's imperfection.
I believe that the Bible is read by those that are less than perfect (All of us) and will never be viewed as perfect to those who decide that it is flawed. That's an example of free will, making that decision. Truly nobody who disregards the Bible does it because it has shown itself to be a book that teaches men to hate each other or kill each other without reason. It's not a book that condemns men for their skin color or nationality. It is a book that says love your enemies and love your neighbors.
It's a good book and there is not one of us that ARE GOOD. (we may DO good but that's NOT the same)
I believe in God/love/perfection so I believe in miracles. That's why I know that I can find truth in the Bible by having faith in God. Without the faith it's just something you're reading.
I know that I'm not perfect and that I don't know everything so I won't purposely lie to myself or anyone else and say that I'm positive about something that I'm not positive about. That is arrogance and nothing else.
My question is: Do you know the 100% history of the earth?
[QUOTE=4339813]Originally posted by The MISTER
[B]For something to be considered to be perfect there must be an example of perfection to compare it to. Almost doesn't count and the difference between perfection and imperfection is as staggering as the difference between finite and infinite.
Many people try to say that the Bible isn't perfect and have gathered evidence to prove it's imperfection.
It's just as perfect as this.
http://www.askwhy.co.uk/judaism/index.html
And this.http://www.askwhy.co.uk/judaism/0237SunGod.html
But to live by Jesus words is a good thing....and that was to love each other.