Darth Vader vs. Freedon Nadd

Revan did not die beacuse of that, the real revan died when you played the game.

Originally posted by Darth Zenemij
Revan did not die beacuse of that, the real revan died when you played the game.

I was not saying that, Revan died I was just saying that Malak never defeated him. Also what do you mean by the "real revan?"

Bump...what can I say? I'm bored.

yup, and whose ravan might i ask.

Vader being underestimated is a bit frustrating...the guy was certainly no weakling. He killed a gang of decently strong masters in Purge, killed the Dark Woman, was responsible for a LOT in the Purge itself...

Nadd supporters need to prove up even more, Nadd never showed himself as anything other than an above average dark jedi

Are you shitting me? You think Darth "OMFG my dick was burnt off and my limbs left in a Mustafar lava pit" Vader can pwn a dark lord who pretty much conquered a planet by himself, slayed Naga Sadow, and his jedi master in a training exercise?

We've seen Vader do quite a bit before, including holding his own agaisnt eight Jedi masters at once, kill the dark woman among other Jedi...

Nadd was a wannabe Dark Lord. He killed Matta by sheer accident and fled in terror after it. Could've happened to anyone. Naga, by the time Nadd found him was ancient and probably a bit out of it from the hibernation. A pissed off young man usually wouldn't have an issue making one vicious stab, Naga also refused to teach Nadd any real Sith secrets, hence Nadd's anger....and Nadd's conquering of Onderon isn't that unimpressive when you consider all he did was kill a few beasts and do some force magic....got him hailed as a god immediately, same as the old Dark Jedi to the Sith.
Nadd didn't exactly take on a massive army by himself...and the idea that a group of jungle guerillas gave him so much trouble...

And Nadd created an amulet that could destroy Sith war beats.. At least in Kun his hands, but Nadd knew the power of that thing. It would be enough to pwn Vader.

Frankly no. I hate to remind you all that even though Vader was by no means the greatest Sith Lord he wouldn't be able to be killed by Nadd as he wouldn't be able to fulfil the prophecy.

That is no reason in this forum... If that were the case then TPM Anakin could defeat the entire PT Jedi Order and all the Sith ever... Becuase he couldn't lose. Stupid logic and therefor it does not apply here.

Anakin would lose.

Nadd.....didn't create an amulet

Originally posted by Fishy
That is no reason in this forum... If that were the case then TPM Anakin could defeat the entire PT Jedi Order and all the Sith ever... Becuase he couldn't lose. Stupid logic and therefor it does not apply here.

Anakin would lose.

No it is sensible logic which must be taken into account. The Trilogy has happened it can't change ifs do not apply.

Originally posted by Grand Moff Gav
No it is sensible logic which must be taken into account. The Trilogy has happened it can't change ifs do not apply.

So you are saying TPM Anakin, would beat Yoda, Sidious, Mace Windu, Marka Ragnos, NJO Luke Skywalker and AOTC Anakin at once?

Oh no wait AOTC Anakin is in there, now who will win? The VS forum has nothing to do with this stupid prophecy, I would suggest you stop refering to it... As it holds no logic and or meaning in fights between two people.

Then by your logic, not one of the forum's duels can possibly take place.

Maul can't fight ROTS Anakin because he's dead, and Anakin got WTFpwned by Obi-Wan, Exar Kun can't fight Luke because they're in different time periods, Grievous, Dooku, Durge, and Ventress can't kill Obi-Wan because he has to be killed by Vader, TUF Jacen can't fight TUF Jaina because that would alter future storylines. . .

Erm, no. These battles exist outside of conitinuity; it's simply character A vs. character B. No strings attached.

Originally posted by Darth Faunus
Then by your logic, not one of the forum's duels can possibly take place.

Maul can't fight ROTS Anakin because he's dead, and Anakin got WTFpwned by Obi-Wan, Exar Kun can't fight Luke because they're in different time periods, Grievous, Dooku, Durge, and Ventress can't kill Obi-Wan because he has to be killed by Vader, TUF Jacen can't fight TUF Jaina because that would alter future storylines. . .

Erm, no. These battles exist outside of conitinuity; it's simply character A vs. character B. No strings attached.

Yes that is my logic but we are getting off-topic so let us presume that the works of GL do not apply and settle this debate with reason..... So what can Vader actually do then since his only strength has been torn from him by philistines?

Infact whats the point of this debate then Freedon Nadd ahs to win because he is the stronger Sith and not trapped in a suit.

Originally posted by Grand Moff Gav
Infact whats the point of this debate then Freedon Nadd ahs to win because he is the stronger Sith and not trapped in a suit.

Well Duh of course Freedon Nadd will win, so this debate is kinda useless. But thats not the point some people didn't know and they know now, thats what matters.

Originally posted by Darth Plagues
Darth Vader has a pretty good chance. He has legendary lightsaber talents and and has incrediable Force abilities.

Originally posted by Darth Syko
What do you mean? Darth Vader isn't that good with the force. He can't even use force lightning cos he got his hands burnt off. Frredon Nadd's brilliant with the force. Vader's just like an evil C3-P0.

Originally posted by DARTH BARAKA
freedon nadd was true sith 2!

Yup this argument is complete.

This is another obvious one. Freedon Nadd had no equal after him.. Plain and simple.

Why bumb a thread which had already been set to death in the deep reaalms of cyberspace?