Al Qaeda does not exist - 'war on terroism' is a fairy tale!

Originally posted by Oswald Kenobi
Your view of these governing bodies is skewed at best. Most of the international organizations are mere toothless authorities. The UN could never bring about a new world order, it's too ineffectual. The World Bank is a sham. NATO is impotent. THe IMF is a joke too. Perhaps I'll believe you when the US disbands NATO and drops out of the UN.

Well Kenobi, you are seeing the world from the perspective they want you to view it so is it any wonder you see it all as they want you to?

You should read a book like Rule By Secret to get a good understand of how such organizations operate and who controls them, ect.

Originally posted by Novusordo
Ok think about this for a second. If David Icke was suddenly killed one day, would you still mindlessly dismiss his information or would you then start to look into it? Exactly.

Icke's fans are in the hundreds of millions.

They hope the ammount dis/mis-information and the half-truths that plague him are enough to make him seem a nutcase it the eye of the dumb sheople.

David Icke could have a stroke or what not. There wouldn't have to be a murder on the official record.

I'd like you to back up that "hundreds of millions" by quoting sales figures on his books. I seriously doubt there are hundreds of millions of fans. Maybe a million, maybe even 10 million, but we all know that in this world, hundreds of millions of people don't agree on anything.

Originally posted by Oswald Kenobi
David Icke could have a stroke or what not. There wouldn't have to be a murder on the official record.

I'd like you to back up that "hundreds of millions" by quoting sales figures on his books. I seriously doubt there are hundreds of millions of fans. Maybe a million, maybe even 10 million, but we all know that in this world, hundreds of millions of people don't agree on anything.

his site gets 50 million hits a month 😄 The most ammount of hits any website gets beside googles and other ultra-frquently visited sites.

His new book ran out of printing batches everyttime and is still doing so and its been out for more than 3 months 😉

here take a look at this thread on Ickes website - it will help you alot, Kenobi 🙂

http://www.ickedownload.com/Forum/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3086&sid=74c5554ef62f79e7b586082978e5f429

Originally posted by Novusordo
his site gets 50 million hits a month 😄 The most ammount of hits any website gets beside googles and other ultra-frquently visited sites.

His new book ran out of printing batches everyttime and is still doing so and its been out for more than 3 months 😉

if he's that good why are the illuminati still in control

Originally posted by Grand Moff Gav,
if he's that good why are the illuminati still in control

Becuase the majority of people... the overwhelming majority are still trapped in the "matrix of ignorance" so to speak...

THe wake up is happening though and people are waking up daily by the hundreds and Icke has been bombarded by letters recently whith a common theme... "hello Icke, I used to think you were a raving lunatic that should of been put into a mental asylum but after I actually wen't and read you're information, I woke up and I thank you so very much for it" 😄

Originally posted by Novusordo
his site gets 50 million hits a month 😄 The most ammount of hits any website gets beside googles and other ultra-frquently visited sites.

His new book ran out of printing batches everyttime and is still doing so and its been out for more than 3 months 😉

"Hits is almost always the largest number and it's sometimes very large indeed. But hits is a raw count of every single file of every type downloaded from the web server. This means every little graphic image as well. A web page which is heavy with graphics can produce 10, 20 or more hits each time it is accessed. Hit counts are, therefore, usually wildly inflated numbers.

Page views are far better and usually show how many times web pages (what are called HTML files) are downloaded. Sites that have lots of content will have high page views even if the number of visitors is quite small.

The best number we have is the third one -- unique visitors. (This is sometimes called hosts or IP addresses). This counts the number of individual computers which have accessed your website. Every computer connected to the Internet is assigned a unique address, so in theory this would count the actual number of visitors to the site."

So, if you could provide the number of unique vistors to his page...

Originally posted by Oswald Kenobi
[B]"Hits is almost always the largest number and it's sometimes very large indeed. But hits is a raw count of every single file of every type downloaded from the web server. This means every little graphic image as well. A web page which is heavy with graphics can produce 10, 20 or more hits each time it is accessed. Hit counts are, therefore, usually wildly inflated numbers.

Page views are far better and usually show how many times web pages (what are called HTML files) are downloaded. Sites that have lots of content will have high page views even if the number of visitors is quite small.

The best number we have is the third one -- unique visitors. (This is sometimes called hosts or IP addresses). This counts the number of individual computers which have accessed your website. Every computer connected to the Internet is assigned a unique address, so in theory this would count the actual number of visitors to the site."

So, if you could provide the number of unique vistors to his page... [/B]

Yes thats all true.

And no I don't beleive it is possibl to do that.

And did you know that Ickes theroies on the reptilian involment with humans is almost 100% exactly the same as the world leading historian on ancient Mesopotamia - Zecharia Sitchin?

his site gets 50 million hits a month

Originally posted by finti
for one who is claimed to have 100 of millions of fans that would be a weak number

Yes but proably a large portion of his fan base is made up of reader sof his books only....

He's published about 15 books so far.

Originally posted by Novusordo
Yes thats all true.

And no I don't beleive it is possibl to do that.

So, 50 million hits is not a significant number. The sales figures for the books is what's really important.

Zecharia Sitchin

He's published about 15 books so far

Originally posted by finti
yet another reliable source 🙄

Well he's the only guy who can read Sumerian and Akkadian near-perfectly so I'm sure his translations are more that satifactory 🙄

Well he's the only guy who can read Sumerian and Akkadian near-perfectly

Originally posted by finti
if he was the only one to read it to near perfection who is left to deciede on this then

Hehe, quite true, but cynasicm shoulden't be used for everything you know.

Originally posted by finti
if he was the only one to read it to near perfection who is left to deciede on this then

Well, it would be nice to have others interrupt it too....for validity sake.

Originally posted by debbiejo
Well, it would be nice to have others interrupt it too....for validity sake.

Although Icke barrows heavily from Sitchins research, he has does his own research himself and their paths cross on many many points.

icke has talked extensively to the African Shamans and they also repeat the same themes that Sitchin talks of.... it all adds up 🙂

Originally posted by Novusordo

icke has talked extensively to the African Shamans and they also repeat the same themes that Sitchin talks of.... it all adds up 🙂

Shamans do know much........hand and hand with quantum.

Originally posted by Novusordo
Anyway Kenobi, here's what you wanted but I don't know why I bother since you're mashed up head is gonna dismiss it as false in some way or another just like everything else we have shown you.

http://www.911dossier.co.uk/hj03.html

More bogus garbage from Novusordo. Why is it every link that you provide looks like it could have been made by any college student in a computer sci class? Half of these links contained in yours either tie up to dead links, web pages that are near National Enquirer type quality, or contain quotes and references to people that either cannot be considered credible/are not of significant importance/provide rather vague information pertaining to your so-called "proofs".

You've been completely hostile toward most people here, you are forcing paranoid lunatic ravings on eveyone around here insisting that it is factual truth... and yet I've found that after reading through most of your material that you do not have a single independent thought of your own. You latch on to suspect or ridiculous postings as gospel without providing any real data. Is this all you do with your time? Sit in a fallout shelter pumping out articles for Crackpot Theory Monthly? I've caught episodes of Montel Williams, Ricki Lake and Jerry Springer that offer more in terms of credible information.

Now that I've finished one rant, allow me to interject one thing. I neither disagree or agree with all of what you have to say. Some items that you have hit upon I happen to find agreeable, while a large majority of the other aspects you have mentioned are complete madness (that numerology garbage is one example... give me Six Degrees of Keviin Bacon, for God's sake). AS it was brought up earlier, if you really had ANY access to information that credibly proved how the government was efficiently controlling us and using the guile of terrorism to have their way, your ability to know this would designate you as a legitimate threat to their work, and you would have to be neutralized.

So why not take a load off, have a Dr. Pepper and a Twinkie and watch a few Dukes of Hazzard re-runs. Because even if there is some credence to what you are preaching, at least I'll have done something enjoyable with my time on this planet as opposed to being miserable and paranoid with every waking moment like yourself.

Seacrest out.