Wolverine Vs. Batman (NO WEAPONS)

Started by batdude12319 pages

😆

I would say that as long as Wolverine dosent go into Beserkar Rage then Batman has a good chance here.

But, if Logan goes Beserk, well then its all over for the dark knight.

seriously without powers Wolvies beserker rage is useless. its part of his powers. it makes him faster,stronger, better healer. that does't help at all without powers cause he has no powers to enhance.

Originally posted by Superherovandal
seriously without powers Wolvies beserker rage is useless. its part of his powers. it makes him faster,stronger, better healer. that does't help at all without powers cause he has no powers to enhance.

actauly it a mind set. with out his pwoer it would still work. what it would do is amp his abilties to there fullest no matter if he has powers or not.

no...his feral state of thinking is part of his powers.

his animalistic senses, his thought process when he goes feral thats one of his mutant abilities. it isn't something he would be able to do as a human.

Originally posted by Superherovandal
no...his feral state of thinking is part of his powers.

berserker is not feral there two totaly diffrent things

lol don't even try to debate me on this lol u just said feral is beserker which it is not there very very very very diffrent form eachother

when i said feral i meant beserker. the animalistic instincts and stuff and beserker rage they are all part of his powers.

Originally posted by Superherovandal
when i said feral i meant beserker. the animalistic instincts and stuff and beserker rage they are all part of his powers.

not realy . when his powers were taken awya he was not as easy to go into beserker rage becuase his powers amde it worse but he was still able to do it. some fighter have it it just how there born it not a power as much as a mind set.

Originally posted by capt it up
lol don't even try to debate me on this lol u just said feral is beserker which it is not there very very very very diffrent form eachother

What are you talking about here? Ferociousness is what the beserker rage is all about. His berserker rage specifically linked to his animalistic mutant powers. Without powers, no beserker rage. Even with a berserker rage, it won't throw Batman off his gameplan. He's too disciplined. In fact, he'd probably welcome it, and still kick his arse......

Originally posted by superman41082
What are you talking about here? Ferociousness is what the beserker rage is all about. His berserker rage specifically linked to his animalistic mutant powers. Without powers, no beserker rage. Even with a berserker rage, it won't throw Batman off his gameplan. He's too disciplined. In fact, he'd probably welcome it, and still kick his arse......

it not full linked to it he was able to sue it quite a few tiems whne he powers were taken away. it a mind set his powers just enchance it.

also batman would never welcome it do u know what berserker rage makes wolverine into?
do u know what it does to wolverine abilites?
also if it was not for agreement i made witha guy who know far more about batman then u I would actauly debate u Im simply telling the facts of wolverine powers becuase of a agreement im not actauly allowed to debate who wins.

all i know is it doesn't matter what it does to his abilities when he has human stats.....................lol

Originally posted by Soleran
all i know is it doesn't matter what it does to his abilities when he has human stats.....................lol

actauly it does. he make his human stats go to prime. he will be able to make his human stats go to fvery limits and even a little beyond that what it does.

i am pretty familiar with what you are presenting here cap. The Romans destroyed berserkers all up and down their borders before Rome got to large.

My point is berserker or not a well thought out strategy with the proper training beats berserkers most of the time.

Originally posted by Soleran
i am pretty familiar with what you are presenting here cap. The Romans destroyed berserkers all up and down their borders before Rome got to large.

My point is berserker or not a well thought out strategy with the proper training beats berserkers most of the time.


those are not beskerer those were babarains there a diffrence.

beserkers is not a race of people there only certain people who have the ability. also it a made up thing based on legends of a few fighter from scotland.

ecpt wolverine is a trained fighter which in berserker just makes him far more deadly but im not supose to be debating im just puting out the facts

No especially the Nordic people were the original berserker people. Don't contort a word just for the benefit of your single character here, I have a good idea of where it came from and its usage.

Just debate it, batdude123 isn't even on.

Originally posted by Soleran
No especially the Nordic people were the original berserker people. Don't contort a word just for the benefit of your single character here, I have a good idea of where it came from and its usage.

Just debate it, batdude123 isn't even on.


naw agreement a agreement.
nope nordic people are barbarians. they ar enot called beserkers.

im not contorling any thing there a huge diffrence between a barbarian and a beserker.

also does it even mater? since when wolverine in beseker it already rove he fights better and retains all his skills

yeah cause thats his power. there is human in which you get beserk and animalistic yet still retain fighting knowledge and tactics. thats definitely one of his powers. Its not humanly possible.

berserker

n : one of the ancient Norse warriors legendary for working themselves into a frenzy before a battle and fighting with reckless savagery and insane fury [syn: berserk]

Nope Nordic people were berserkers, there is a little fun with words for you thanks! Batman wins this he can amp himself through his different arts.