London Underground Bombing 'ExercisTook Place at Same Time as Real Attackes'

Started by Deano8 pages

London Underground Bombing 'ExercisTook Place at Same Time as Real Attackes'

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2005/090705bombingexercises.htm

A consultancy agency with government and police connections was running an exercise for an unnamed company that revolved around the London Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as happened in real life on the morning of July 7th.Peter Power was a former Scotland Yard official, working at one time with the Anti Terrorist Branch.

Power told the host that at the exact same time that the London bombings were taking place, his company was running a 1,000 person strong exercise which drilled the London Underground being bombed at the exact same locations, at the exact same times, as happened in real life.This is precisely what happened on the morning of 9/11/2001. The CIA was conducting drills of flying hijacked planes into the WTC and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning.

It is clear that at least five if not six training exercises were in operation in the days leading up to and on the morning of 9/11. This meant that NORAD radar screens showed as many as 22 hijacked airliners at the same time. NORAD had been briefed that this was part of the exercise drill and therefore normal reactive procedure was forestalled and delayedIn any crime you look at history and motive, The British government has been caught in multiple examples of carrying out bombings in London which were then blamed on the IRA. They even had one of their own MI5 agents wihin the Omagh bomb squad. Click here for an archive of this evidence.

The wider agenda will become clearer when Blair firmly points the finger at the selected patsies designated to take the fall. But for the moment he's happy to grandstand as the courageous leader who immedately returned to London to take control of the chaos..

Prove it.

prove what?
that they were running drills?
have you read any of the webpage at all?

It's funny how the public and media are quite willing to accept lies pedalled by the politicians without any demand for 'proof' and yet they insist on proof from anyone challenging the official version of reality. The
official 'truth' of September 11th is one such case.

Yes I have read it. It's all puerile shit. Prove it- to decent standards and with proper sources. All you have is a training exercise in the underground- in fact, noit even a proper training exercise, because all it is is some PR firm going through the motions of crisis management. Everything else is bullcrap.

Prove it or look an idiot- again.

By proof (or as I prefer to call it "Evidence"😉 people want documents, pictures, audio recording, or some kind of spoken or written statement that could make your reports have some validity. You're only speculating here Deano.

Deano, no offence meant, coz we're cool outside of all this debate stuff, but you're an idiot.

How can you actually claim to be anything resembling a genius when you put out stupid shit like this?

You know, it's not even the conspiracy theories. Because one reasonable theory every now and then provides good debate, but you actually post new theories, shit theories, pointless "I'm not a sheep but I follow whatever theory I'm shown" theories, every day.

It's getting so cliched.

-AC

its not stupid, and im not an idiot
but keep telling yourself that

why can't we 'feel' and 'know' our reality instead of insisting that the conditioned and manipulated mind must be the only arbiter of 'truth' through the production of evidence that it believes to be 'proof'? What is 'proof', anyway? Proof is only that which the conditioned mind accepts to be so. Billions are convinced that the official version of 9/11 is true because of the 'proof' revealed by the United States government. After all, didn't they find a passport from one of the hijackers that had miraculously survived the fireball to be found in the street? Well, actually, no they didn't because that was a ·lie. But the FBI named the 19 hijackers didn't they?
No, they gave us 19 names, at least seven of which were found to be still alive. But they proved Bin Laden did it, surely? I heard them say that. Yes, exactly, we heard them say it and nothing more. They produced
no 'proof' of anything, only the repetition of their fairy tale that billions accepted as 'proof'. It was those using their 'hearts', their intuition, who knew something was very wrong with the official version even
before any further investigation had begun.

That is more prevaricating nonsense. So long as you fail to make any remote attempt to actually back what you say, people will consider you an idiot regardless of your opinion on the matter, and with good cause.

This kind of stuff is getting old. Deano, you should quit while you are ahead.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
That is more prevaricating nonsense. So long as you fail to make any remote attempt to actually back what you say, people will consider you an idiot regardless of your opinion on the matter, and with good cause.

Peter Power was a former Scotland Yard official, working at one time with the Anti Terrorist Branch.

Power told the host that at the exact same time that the London bombings were taking place, his company was running a 1,000 person strong exercise which drilled the London Underground being bombed at the exact same locations, at the exact same times, as happened in real life.

The transcript is as follows.

POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.

HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?

POWER: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don't want to reveal their name but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had a room full of crisis managers for the first time they'd met and so within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on.

Originally posted by RedAlertv2
This kind of stuff is getting old. Deano, you should quit while you are ahead.

why? because what people think of me?, nah.

That is a man saying he was running a consultation exercise. I want proof of the conspiracy you are implicating. Get a dictionary.

It is also a lie. He was NOT running an exercise of over a thousand people. Can't you read and/or listen? He was running an exercise FOR a company, which he describes (the company) of being over a thousand people.

The exercise consisted of nothing more than a room full of 'crisis managers', whatever the hell that term means, probably in a room in Picadilly, where the company is based.

If your website cant even spot a playschool error like that in their own conclusions, its total shiteness is confirmed.

''Only you know if it feels right to you or not; you don't need some guy
with a fancy title and letters after his name to tell you what to think. What does your heart say? That's all that matters. Second, the last thing I am trying to do is convince anyone of anything, that's not my intention
or desire at all. So why bother doing what I do? I want to understand what is going on and I believe it is right that everyone should have access to all information available and not just the version that suits those in power. What people make of it is their business, not mine. Third, even for those who still demand 'proof' for everything, there is an increasingly enormous amount of scientific support for the themes i have covered fantastic as they may have appeared to be at first hearing''

More prevaricating (and frankly trite) nonsense as one of the central parts of your bullshit claim already lies in tatters.

You cannot prove it. You cannot offer any evidence for it. It's all shite. To front it, therefore, you would have to be an idiot.

I am glad you enjoy being like that.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
It is also a lie. He was NOT running an exercise of over a thousand people. Can't you read and/or listen? He was running an exercise FOR a company, which he describes (the company) of being over a thousand people.

The exercise consisted of nothing more than a room full of 'crisis managers', whatever the hell that term means, probably in a room in Picadilly, where the company is based.

If your website cant even spot a playschool error like that in their own conclusions, its total shiteness is confirmed.

point is the British government or one of their private company offshoots could have hired Visor to run the exercise for a number of purposes.The exercise fulfils several different goals. It acts as a cover for the small compartamentalized government terrorists to carry out their operation without the larger security services becoming aware of what they're doing, and, more importantly, if they get caught during the attack or after with any incriminating evidence they can just claim that they were just taking part in the exercise.

This is precisely what happened on the morning of 9/11/2001. The CIA was conducting drills of flying hijacked planes into the WTC and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
More prevaricating (and frankly trite) nonsense as one of the central parts of your bullshit claim already lies in tatters.

You cannot prove it. You cannot offer any evidence for it. It's all shite. To front it, therefore, you would have to be an idiot.

I am glad you enjoy being like that.

likewise

That's just more copy/pasting from that same bullshit site and so does not count as anything more than rabid speculation, wasting my time and yours, and not even remotely approaching proof.

Making yourself look more and more stupid here. Happy to let you do that all day.