London Underground Bombing 'ExercisTook Place at Same Time as Real Attackes'

I would like to add my contribution to this thread 🙂

Everyday, Scotland Yard, Met police and Government officials recieve threats. In 99% of the cases these events never occured.

The administration knew that at this point it was not a question of IF London will get a terrorist attack ; It was a question of WHEN.

Hence, drills are the order of the day in big cities like London. If on that dreaded day last week, officials recieved a tip-off on the bombs what would you expect them to do if by the statistical ratio of Threats/ Bombs is out-balanced by scares (Just like Birmingham)

If you are expecting the Government to respond to threats in the same manner the evacuation was manouvered in Birmingham, we might as well not go out at all and stay at home.

A friend of mine from Birmingham told me that it was like that film - 28 days later.

Empty streets and nobody around.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
Prove exactly what happened there, and in what circumstances, ans it can be debated. Simply saying "NORAD was stood down, therefore there was a conspiracy' has no value.

norad stood down for the first time in 50 years
what more do you want
look it up

Originally posted by Deano
dont post here then,
as for callin me a moron, ive heard many many people call you far worse on here.

I didn't call you a moron. I called the guy who wrote all that stuff on the website a moron. Mmm, Someone didn't pass reading comprehension. Like Ushgark said you can't prove all this stuff you are saying. "Bin laden could have had a double". Well..how can you prove that?

First of all, do not expect ME to have to look up YOUR claims to back them. Do the work yourself or be ignored.

Secondly, I see no evidence that it was ever shut down. Not even your own website you have been quoting from here says so. It talks very actively about what was happening with an obviously very active NORAD.

Try again. Turn you brain on first this time.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
Prove it. Else your refutations are just speculation and so useless.

that comment is becoming tiring as well as my posts are to you.

again:

It's funny how the public and media are quite willing to accept lies pedalled by the politicians without any demand for 'proof' and yet they insist on proof from anyone challenging the official version of reality. The
official 'truth' of September 11th is one such case. A schoolboy could take the story apart. But when faced with other explanations for these events, and for life itself, the same people who accept this crap without question scream: "Where's the proof?" "That's all very well, mate, but how can you convince me if you don't have the evidence to prove it? I can't believe what hasn't been proved, can I?" Oh, but people do; and they go on doing so all their lives.

take what u will from it..i dont care

Originally posted by Deano
could of been lying, just trying to milk everything so he could become a god among his sickening evil followers.
dont forget al quaida are cia trained. how do u know that was the real bin laden? it cud of been anyone..as stupid as it sounds, a simple quote like that could be put together in minutes..im sure he has a few body doubles..as much as you are gonna slate me for saying that..well, what else is new

No Deano that was the man himself. It was his voice, his face, and his body language. Al Jazeera T.V. belongs to the Sheikh Qatar. The video tape came from Bin Laden. How they obtain the video is a matter of specualtion and debate.

Edit: Can we please stop calling each other morons and Idiots? No matter how silly the argument may sound there really is NO need to call each other names. That would only lead to hostility.

WD

If you don't care, don't post. If you don't want to see the comment about proof again- which is a very valid, reasonable, and logical comment- try doing it.

If you are only ever doing to post more spurious rhetoric in lieu of evidence, then forever will you be seen as an idiot- and as I say, rightly so.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
First of all, do not expect ME to have to look up YOUR claims to back them. Do the work yourself or be ignored.

Secondly, I see no evidence that it was ever shut down. Not even your own website you have been quoting from here says so. It talks very actively about what was happening with an obviously very active NORAD.

Try again. Tuirn you brain on first this time.

i have commented and posted stuff countless amounts of times.

it is hard to digest all of the information that he throws at you. But after a short time, a light bulb definitely clicks on in your brain, and you suddenly feel like you've been awakened from a deep New World Order induced sleep. The "movie" that we're all participating in is in place to keep the masses from knowing what's really going on.Icke did some investigating into NORAD's role (or lack of it) on the morning of 9-11. But first he told us about how NORAD handled the situation with golfer Payne Stewart's private Lear Jet. The (pre 9-11) rule is, if an air traffic controller loses contact with any plane, it calls NORAD. NORAD then dispatches two fighter jets to fly and meet the plane, and get close enough to it to see what's happening in the cockpit. NORAD did exactly this October 25, 1999 when Stewart's jet started acting suspiciously after its takeoff from Florida. Icke states that NORAD dispatched jets to check out potentially problematic planes approximately 200 times in 2000. But why were the "hijacked" planes not responded to in this way? Even if they didn't know about the first plane until it was too late (though this is highly doubtful since NORAD claims to have gotten information about the hijackings at 8:38 AM, 10 minutes before the first plane hit the WTC) the next plane didn't hit the second tower for a full 15 minutes, and the third plane hit the Pentagon 50 minutes after the hijackings were first discovered. Another question is, why send fighter jets from Massachusetts to investigate a hijacked plane heading for Washington DC, when Andrews Air Force base is 10 miles away from the Pentagon? And finally the fighter jets were able to stop a plane, Flight 93, by shooting it out of the sky in Shanksville, PA. But even that is being covered up with a story about passenger heroics and patriotism. When Icke called NORAD for information, he was told that they couldn't (wouldn't) comment because of the "ongoing investigation." Just a coincidence. Nothing to worry about.l

Nope- you only ever posted nonsense with duff sources.

And sorry, even if that block of text, unsourced, WAS a convincing piece of evidence- which it ain't- where does it say that NORAD was shut down?

Man, you are useless at this.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
If you don't care, don't post. If you don't want to see the comment about proof again- which is a very valid, reasonable, and logical comment- try doing it.

If you are only ever doing to post more spurious rhetoric in lieu of evidence, then forever will you be seen as an idiot- and as I say, rightly so.

forever will you be seen as an idiot- and as I say, rightly so.? wow you are hurting my feelings. its easy to name call isnt it?
you cannot grasp reality of what is really going on..so u call me the idiot

It's funny how Deano talks about the people who disagree with him as "blind sheep." He quotes the same conspiracy theory websites, never a mianstream news source or someone who has researched an event and can back it up with research notes. He says NORAD stood down for the first time in 50 years, but no reliable source (ie. someone inside NORAD) is ever quoted. He believes everything that is reported on a conspiracy theory website, without ever checking the claims and questioning the motive. So, if we are all "blind sheep" for trusting the mainstream media, he is as equally blind trusting his source of news.

Deano is the true sheep, he is a sheep to those people on conspiracy theory websites. They can post anything and he will just get a grand smile on his face and come to KMC to post one of his crazy theories.

i think you guys should get back on topic - and thats not deano

Originally posted by Ushgarak
Nope- you only ever posted nonsense with duff sources.

And sorry, even if that block of text, unsourced, WAS a convincing piece of evidence- which it ain't- where does it say that NORAD was shut down?

Man, you are useless at this.

if norad wasnt shut down then it would of investigated the planes woudnt it?
use your brain for once in this thread

either NORAD were intentionally confused by the wargames taking place on the morning of 9/11 or were they ordered to stand down.

Originally posted by Deano
forever will you be seen as an idiot- and as I say, rightly so.? wow you are hurting my feelings. its easy to name call isnt it?
you cannot grasp reality of what is really going on..so u call me the idiot

Sadly, Deano, it is you who buys into these paranoid fantasies, perversions of reality with no evidence, sense, logic or brains behind them. It is a truly pitiful situation. Despite your inability to defend any of it with any of that logic or evidence or intelligence, you cling onto it, running on and on and on posting this idiocy, trapped like a hamster in a wheel, just getting nowhere but unable to see that.

I'm not making you the idiot- you condemned yourself to that. Sorry to throw a dose of painful reality in your face, but there you go.

I am sure you feel very strongly about having your fantasies questions. But that is just what they are. Childish fantasies, like Santa Claus or the tooth fairy. Conspiracy theory is born of a more teenaged mindset- the first time you hear about fakred moon landings it sounds great, until you check it out and see what nonsense such claims are; but most people move on pretty quickly. A shame you cannot.

Originally posted by Deano
if norad wasnt shut down then it would of investigated the planes woudnt it?
use your brain for once in this thread

either NORAD were intentionally confused by the wargames taking place on the morning of 9/11 or were they ordered to stand down.

Like I say, your own website talks extensively about what they think NORAD was doing. The fact that NORAD WAS still active in that time, and there are even transcripts of their radio conversations, makes it obviously your brain in question.

And all of that is bollocks anyway, and you have still offered no proof. Give me evidence that builds up to a picture of NORAD being hampered and then there is a case to answer. Until you do that... it's just more bullshit words.

Originally posted by GCG
i think you guys should get back on topic - and thats not deano

I'm just waiting for Novusordo to stop by so that we can all have a tea party with this topic. 😉

Originally posted by KidRock
Deano is the true sheep, he is a sheep to those people on conspiracy theory websites. They can post anything and he will just get a grand smile on his face and come to KMC to post one of his crazy theories.

its an agenda
accept it

you are the sheep that is keeping the other sheep in line and making life unpleasant for anyone who tries to escape. aka me. 'im an idiot im nuts im crazy' etc

As I outlined earlier, this fear of being different and voicing a view that challenges the 'norms' is overwhelmingly the fear of what other people will think of us. im not afraid of what people think. i have studyed the global conspiracy and i believe in it. if im an idiot to you then so be it

Originally posted by WindDancer
I'm just waiting for Novusordo to stop by so that we can all have a tea party with this topic. 😉

😱 Tea Party ? Who will be the mad hatter ?

Originally posted by Deano
that comment is becoming tiring as well as my posts are to you.

again:

take what u will from it..i dont care

If you don't care, why do you keep posting?