Originally posted by Movie_Geek_
Starfox Adventures had good graphics but I did not care for the play much.
On topic - Being a 12 rated game, I take it everyone is looking forward to this (but not under 12's that aren't allowed the game, awww... 😛 )
I'm really looking forward to it because of this. Being 16, I don't perfer the 15-16 rated games, I perfer the 12's. I am a bit younger in my mind, I'm not imature, like some idiots/chavs I know at school, but I like the younger stuff.
I took Jak 2 into this coffee shop where teenagers/kids hang out & play games, listen to music etc & they laughed, well some did, some were okay. I like Pokemon too, but hardly anyone knows at school, hardly! I'd get stuff said at me! 🙁
I've been playing the Zelda games since I was 7 years old, and my absolute favorite is A Link to the Past on the SNES. After that, I'd have to pick Ocarina of Time. Twilight Princess looks very promising, with beautiful graphics and good story, it should be a breath of fresh air for all of us after The Wind Waker. Not that I didnt enjoy Wind Waker, but I prefer the real deal. I just wish that they'd find a new angle for Link, instead of the "young boy fights sorcerer Gannon and rescues Zelda" routine every single game. Granted, that is what makes them so good, you can only go so far, you know? Like in the Resident Evil games. RE4 was a BIG breath of fresh air for gamers who, like me, were getting a little bored with the same thing game after game. All in all though, I expect the new Zelda game to deliver the goods with a powerful punch! I can't wait.
Well I supose I don't blame them, Wind Waker was more of a child's game & it didn't stick to it's Zelda like formular!
Originally posted by Impediment
I've been playing the Zelda games since I was 7 years old, and my absolute favorite is A Link to the Past on the SNES. After that, I'd have to pick Ocarina of Time.Twilight Princess looks very promising, with beautiful graphics and good story, it should be a breath of fresh air for all of us after The Wind Waker.
Not that I didnt enjoy Wind Waker, but I prefer the real deal. I just wish that they'd find a new angle for Link, instead of the "young boy fights sorcerer Gannon and rescues Zelda" routine every single game. Granted, that is what makes them so good, you can only go so far, you know?
Like in the Resident Evil games. RE4 was a BIG breath of fresh air for gamers who, like me, were getting a little bored with the same thing game after game.
All in all though, I expect the new Zelda game to deliver the goods with a powerful punch! I can't wait.
Originally posted by Blue Dragon
Problems with WW:Didn't have enough dungeons
Too much sea
Not enough land
Didn't like the idea of islands
No temples
No fields
Finding the Triforce pieces was a drag
There were only 2 temples after the master swordI think that's about it, can't think of anything else on top of my head...
Only one lie in this, There were 2 temples:
1. The Earth Temple (Medli came with you to that)
2. The Wind temple (Makar came with you to that)
(I do think the wind temple should have been the earth temple and the Earth temple should have been the shadow temple.)
Other problems:
The Puppet Ganon battle sucked
Tingle was in it
The re-deads looked like naked clowns
The poes looked like clowns
The stalfos were stupid
The screwed up the kokori turning them in to koroks
The Graphics didn't work
Must I say any more?
The good things:
The battle with Ganondorf
Link's moves
That's about it.
Originally posted by JToTheP
I don't either, people hate it, yet it was worlds better then that piece of shit Majora's Mask, but it's impossible to teach people that. Besides, it WAS a Zelda game, IT.HAS.ZELDA.FOR.STARTERS.
I would have to agree. WindWaker was much better than Majora's Mask. Although I don't think MM was a shitty game. It was good in my opinion, however I felt really restricted with the whole time limit thing.