Congressman Threatens Islamic Holy Sites

Started by PVS8 pages

Congressman Threatens Islamic Holy Sites

--Congressman Threatens Islamic Holy Sites--
The Associated Press
Monday, July 18, 2005; 8:25 AM

DENVER -- A Colorado congressman told a radio show host that the U.S. could "take out" Islamic holy sites if Muslim fundamentalist terrorists attacked the country with nuclear weapons.

Rep. Tom Tancredo made his remarks Friday on WFLA-AM in Orlando, Fla. His spokesman stressed he was only speaking hypothetically.

Talk show host Pat Campbell asked the Littleton Republican how the country should respond if terrorists struck several U.S. cities with nuclear weapons.

"Well, what if you said something like _ if this happens in the United States, and we determine that it is the result of extremist, fundamentalist Muslims, you know, you could take out their holy sites," Tancredo answered.

"You're talking about bombing Mecca," Campbell said.

"Yeah," Tancredo responded.

The congressman later said he was "just throwing out some ideas" and that an "ultimate threat" might have to be met with an "ultimate response."

Spokesman Will Adams said Sunday the four-term congressman doesn't support threatening holy Islamic sites but that Tancredo was grappling with the hypothetical situation of a terrorist strike deadlier than the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

"We have an enemy with no uniform, no state, who looks like you and me and only emerges right before an attack. How do we go after someone like that?" Adams said.

"What is near and dear to them? They're willing to sacrifice everything in this world for the next one. What is the pressure point that would deter them from their murderous impulses?" he said.

Tancredo is known in the House for his tough stand on immigration and had a 100 percent rating last year from the American Conservative Union his votes and positions on issues.

Mohammad Noorzai, coordinator of the Colorado Muslim Council and a native of Afghanistan, said Tancredo's remarks were radical and unrepresentative but that people in Tancredo's position need to watch their words when it comes to sacred religious sites and texts.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/18/AR2005071800284.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all i can say is that this is frightening, disgusting, creepy, and flatout racist.
this prick needs to either resign or be thrown out of office.

for the simple minded racist assclowns who are about to say "GOOD IDEA!!!"
how would you feel about our government blowing up the vatacan for the crimes of some christian exteremists? of coarse you wouldnt like that, because its DIFFERENT right? so please explain why. (just getting that crap out of the way)

anyway, discuss...

I won't go so far as to agree with the man, but I would be interested in knowing what "their" breaking point would be.

I agree with Cap Fantastic. I'm exactly supporting any action that would lead to the breaking point, but I'm interested in knowing what their breaking point is...

I don't think the Congressman truly meant that the United States should bomb Mecca so much as he was stating his desire to know what the terrorists find most precious so that we could deprive them of that.

could it have been any more clear?

the logic is, destroy what the terrorists hold sacred, regardless of who ELSE holds it sacred and how many innocents inhabit the place at the time. the killing would be indiscriminate and only serve as a symbolic message... which would make us ______________! (fill in the blank) \

*hint: it begins with a 't' , ends with an 's' and contains the letters: 'errorist'

Yes...well...you actually already are......you can call it "war" if yu liek but its just an attack on another country just what "terrorists" did to the US (of course they kind of got what there government was asking for...but thats a different matter)

no no no, the target is insurgents. im not saying the war is right, but (from what we know) there are no symbolic targets, and no willful killing of civilians. we just bomb wherever and whoever gets killed "oh well". but the fact stands that civilians and non-military locations are not purposely targeted (like i said, 'from what we know' ) . its not right, but its not terrorism either. if we bombed the mecca as a symbolic gesture, that is 100% terrorist activity.

Yes you are right....I guess...,,I am sorry.....although I don't see any moral difference but I guess there is one.....

Lonkalocios, you are new?

😕

Originally posted by Kate_Lost
Lonkalocios, you are new?

Funny...."new" in this old "I am here for 2 years already"-way 😛

And its name is Linkalicious

Originally posted by PVS
could it have been any more clear?

the logic is, destroy what the terrorists hold sacred, regardless of who ELSE holds it sacred and how many innocents inhabit the place at the time. the killing would be indiscriminate and only serve as a symbolic message... which would make us ______________! (fill in the blank) \

*hint: it begins with a 't' , ends with an 's' and contains the letters: 'errorist'

While I agree for the most part, the point I'm taking away from his comments are that bombing Mecca and Medina would break their will to fight. However, the truth of the matter is that destroying the religions holy sites will do little to stop the zeal with which these terrorists fight. In fact, I'm sure it would result in a strengthening of their resolve.

What this guy doesn't seem to be understanding is that this isn't a war against Islam. It's a war against people who take Islam too far.

But, the point of my first comment was that I would be interested in knowing what this mystical "breaking point" really would be. If this were a crusade for territory or slaves or money, then there would be an end point in view with all of this. But, religion isn't a tangable thing. (Which also proves my point about the congressmans comments.) This is a battle of ideologies; and if history is an indication, that doesn't go away...even after one side has been physically defeated.

dropping a Nuclear Bomb on Mecca during the Haj would definetly cause some unrest in the Muslim community. Could bring the rabbits out of the hole so they can be picked off.

Whether it is the right thing to do is another thing. In a few decades the world will be overrun with Muslims at the current growth rate, they´ll become the majority and vote some mullahs in. I don´t like that idea at all.

I´m suprised no non muslim extremists havn´t stared thier own Terrorist group yet, and gone arround blowing Mosques up. Imagine the damage that would be caused considering the wealth and technology these poeple may have. Im talking about White christian extremists who are sick of the liberal approach.

Originally posted by Bicnarok
dropping a Nuclear Bomb on Mecca during the Haj would definetly cause some unrest in the Muslim community. Could bring the rabbits out of the hole so they can be picked off.

Whether it is the right thing to do is another thing. In a few decades the world will be overrun with Muslims at the current growth rate, they´ll become the majority and vote some mullahs in. I don´t like that idea at all.

I´m suprised no non muslim extremists havn´t stared thier own Terrorist group yet, and gone arround blowing Mosques up. Imagine the damage that would be caused considering the wealth and technology these poeple may have. Im talking about White christian extremists who are sick of the liberal approach.

What exactly is the "liberal approach"?

I'm for what ever it takes............

Originally posted by debbiejo
I'm for what ever it takes............

Unfortunately, so are the terrorists.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Funny...."new" in this old "I am here for 2 years already"-way 😛

And its name is Linkalicious

His

Originally posted by debbiejo
I'm for what ever it takes............

well, you just lost all my respect 😬

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Unfortunately, so are the terrorists.

So we should let them win and turn the world into a middle ages type muslim planet or what?

by Liberal I meant over tolerant, in some european counrties the "liberals" are rediculously tolerant. Ahh the poor disturbed muslim extremists, lets not deport them after all but give them some fine.

Originally posted by Bicnarok
So we should let them win and turn the world into a middle ages type muslim planet or what?

HELL NO!!!!! WE WILL WIN and turn the world into a middle ages CHRISTIAN planet!!!! 😬

Originally posted by Linkalicious
His

Just making sure