Originally posted by NCRotCA
In other words, yes.So you accept that probability has to be applied to reach a conclusion?
No, probability should be avoided as much as possible. There is a reason why forum rules state that unknowns can't be used. If we allow probability to interfere with facts then we'll go around throwing "no u's" at eachother all the time.
Why did NCRotCA get banned? Look ppl, I don't agree with his argument (or any of them so far), and I think he's a ***king arrogant, pretentious, prick. However, should someone be banned based on how they choose to debate on this forum. On the other hand, I know alot of you think he's Neb, and he MIGHT very well be him. But without knowing for a fact that it really is Neb, it's kind of ****ed up to ban him based on what is ultimately suspicion with no proof. Just my two cents.