Originally posted by D_Dude1210
Agreed. Just trying to figure out who's sock he is...
He's not a sock just.....I dunno.
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=418663&pagenumber=2337
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
Agreed. Just trying to figure out who's sock he is...
He's not a sock just.....I dunno.
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=418663&pagenumber=2337
Originally posted by quanchi112
It's right in the rules this isn't how we debate on here. Basically your rationale is wolverine beats Magus because he's also more well known, more popular, and a good guy.No Bias Claims
"Batman can beat Thor because he's cooler!" That's an example of how not to debate. We would like to see the rationale behind any claims that one character can beat the other rather than a claim based on popularity and subjective bias.
Also, we insist that all claims be backed up by evidence from canon sources. If you claim that Spiderman is stronger than Superman, then you have to prove it.
If that's what the writer decides yes, hence Spierman beats Firelord, Cap winds the Hulk, Hawkeye defeats an Elder of the Universe, Batman beats white Martians etc,
Originally posted by ValidityWe don't debate based on what the writer might decide and say all heroes beat all villains first off because that's not even what happens in the comics. There's a reason heroes join teams because one on one they face threats eve they can't stop.
If that's what the writer decides yes, hence Spierman beats Firelord, Cap winds the Hulk, Hawkeye defeats an Elder of the Universe, Batman beats white Martians etc,
You make no sense and have since been banned because you were an obvious sock from the start.