Originally posted by Bardock42
I am not sure what you are aiming at but if you won't to say stupid brats deserve an execution I am with you....
No, i've made my point on the matter clear. I don't agree with what the guy did, but i think those kids were absolute morons, and i blame american society for that.
As to you, chill dude, i'm just joking. GMG (grand moff gav) has an unhealthy passion and love for totalitarianism and i'm getting worried about you slipping into it too now 😉
~wickerman~
Originally posted by botankusWell but you have a good sporting chance if you throw eggs...he will only get one of you so if you are five you will only die in 20% of the cases...while Bubba will do things to you in 100% of the cases.......
Warning to brats throwing items off bridges in the future:Make sure what you're throwing is large enough to kill the motorist. That way, you'll only have to face the infamous "Bubba" in prison instead of being picked off on top of a bridge.
Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
Yeah, real reasonable. Kids being killed for being kids by someone who probably doesn't have a license to carry a consealed weapon. 🙄
I don't believe anyone in here really believes that what the man did was reasonable, however, they do believe what he did was somewhat justified. The kids were attacking people. Yes that's right.. ATTACKING the drivers on the highway. They could have possibly taken lives with their actions. Imagine if one of those eggs had obstructed a driver's vision, and he collided with another driver...who then collided with another driver...etc etc...it really could have been a bad situation...
It's illegal to throw eggs? In what sense, littering? How the **** are you people justifying murder..?
When you attack someone..with the intention of physically harming them...it's called ASSAULT. Regardless of what the children were using as a means to assualt people..it doesn't make their actions any less of a crime. If the children had caused an accident that had taken several people lives...would you then be so inclined to call them "murderers?"
I don't mean to sound like an a-hole..but these children definately need to learn the seriousness of their actions. I believe the police need to spend more time on prosecuting the children, then they do hunting down the man who shot at them.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Well but you have a good sporting chance if you throw eggs...he will only get one of you so if you are five you will only die in 20% of the cases...while Bubba will do things to you in 100% of the cases.......
If you show Bubba that you're not going to be his b**ch then that number drops to 97%.
Originally posted by whobdamandog
I don't believe anyone in here really believes that what the man did was reasonable, however, they do believe what he did was somewhat justified. The kids were attacking people. Yes that's right.. ATTACKING the drivers on the highway. They could have possibly taken lives with their actions. Imagine if one of those eggs had obstructed a driver's vision, and he collided with another driver...who then collided with another driver...etc etc...it really could have been a bad situation...When you attack someone..with the intention of physically harming them...it's called ASSAULT. Regardless of what the children were using as a means to assualt people..it doesn't make their actions any less of a crime. If the children had caused an accident that had taken several people lives...would you then be so inclined to call them "murderers?"
I don't mean to sound like an a-hole..but these children definately need to learn the seriousness of their actions. I believe the police need to spend more time on prosecuting the children, then they do hunting down the man who shot at them.
Add "They're imbeciles" to that and you have what i said only more eloquently put. Nice show old boy 👆
~wickerman~
anyway, nothing is right about this.
but one thing is certain. if you f*** with people in such a manner, you dont deserve to be hurt or killed, but you have it coming. if you make a habit of picking up hitchhikers without a care of whether or not they are lunatics, you dont deserve to fall victim, but you have it coming. flying down the highway in a kawasaki crotch rocket at 130 m.p.h., hit a pothole and become a human projectile? you didnt deserve that at all, but you had it coming. if you go to your nearest ghetto and wave around a fat stack of cash, you dont deserve to be mugged and shot, but you certainly have it coming.
thats a concept which people need to grasp. if you ignore potential danger from your actions, you invite disaster. you meet it half way.
if you f*** around and piss people off that you dont even know, you have to accept the possability that you will run into a wacko who will kill your ass.
thats a nugget of common sense which they were unfortunately not taught, or never adhered to.
Originally posted by lil bitchiness
I hope he gets find and I hope he is made to appologize to boys parents.That guy is a shithead, and I hope there is a prison sentance waiting. Apperantly shooting once wasn't enough.
Yep. I hope for that too. I also hope the uninjured (and the one shot in the leg) boys get prosecuted for acts of vandalism and Assault.
~wickerman~
Originally posted by PVS
if you f*** around and piss people off that you dont even know, you have to accept the possability that you will run into a wacko who will kill your ass.
Here's an example where the "driver" is not a wacko.
One morning John gets on the roof of a 8-story building and starts urinating off of it onto the pedestrians below. For a good 10 minutes, he is soaking dozens of people walking by with his urine, and when someone figures out where the liquid is coming from, the people down below start yelling obscenities at the whizzer.
The guy on the roof's response is to continue to gush more urine onto everyone, including those that are complaining. One guy has had enough down below. He picks up a rock and throws it up at the guy. It hits him square in the forehead and before he can zip up, he falls 8 stories to his death.
Does the urine-soaked pedestrian deserve to visit Bubba in this case?
Originally posted by botankus
Here's an example where the "driver" is not a wacko.One morning John gets on the roof of a 8-story building and starts urinating off of it onto the pedestrians below. For a good 10 minutes, he is soaking dozens of people walking by with his urine, and when someone figures out where the liquid is coming from, the people down below start yelling obscenities at the whizzer.
The guy on the roof's response is to continue to gush more urine onto everyone, including those that are complaining. One guy has had enough down below. He picks up a rock and throws it up at the guy. It hits him square in the forehead and before he can zip up, he falls 8 stories to his death.
Does the urine-soaked pedestrian deserve to visit Bubba in this case?
Yes he does. It was involuntary manslaughter at best. However, if i were him, i'd call the cops on the dude, and either:
1. let THEM take him to see Bubba....
2. Yell "Quickly, look behiiiind youuuuuuuuu!!!!!!!!!!!!!".....that should throw him off balance just enough so he can fall down by himself 👆
~wickerman~
Originally posted by KidRock
Throwing bricks isn't legal? So it would be against the law if I went in my backyard and threw a brick 2 feet at a tree?
I'd like to thinik you know I meant throwing it at people, when its considered a deadly weapon, used with an intent to harm.
Originally posted by KidRock
The kids shouldnt have commited attempted murder.
You think they were out to kill someone? Are you that dense, seriously? Is this an act? Jackie, is that you?
Originally posted by GCGAnd if they ran out of eggs, they would drop other things on the highways, including rocks, stones, boulders.......etc. basically anything they can get their hands on.
If..if..if...if. So many of you people are banking on "ifs". Who are you to say? This happened on a RESIDENTIAL STREET IN INDIANAPOLIS. Aside from being physically incapable of "throwing" a boulder, I don't think they're readily available.
Originally posted by GCGIf you calculate the speed the car was drinving + the mass and gravity pull over a small object, even an egg can cause a pretty nasty accident and injury.
Again, residential street, driver had his window down, meaning he was either COMPLETELY STOPPED, or the kid had impeccable aim.
Originally posted by Afro Cheese
The kids got what was coming to them. Harmless pranks aren't so harmless these days, and kids are learning this the hard way.
Sickening to hear from anyone.
Originally posted by Fishy
Doesn't look bad for him either, becuase they will probably never catch him.
The 3 kids that survived weren't blind, I'm sure they saw something.
Originally posted by Wickerman
No, i've made my point on the matter clear. I don't agree with what the guy did, but i think those kids were absolute morons, and i blame american society for that.
..and I blame society for gladly accepting rampant violence as a way of retaliation, suggesting kids deserve death for a prank. Regardless of age, it was a prank, and who's to say they knew any better? Apparently they didn't.
Originally posted by botankus
Warning to brats throwing items off bridges in the future:Make sure what you're throwing is large enough to kill the motorist. That way, you'll only have to face the infamous "Bubba" in prison instead of being picked off on top of a bridge.
Where is this "bridge" thing coming from? You're like the third person to say that. Jeez.
Originally posted by whobdamandog
Imagine [b]if one of those eggs had obstructed a driver's vision, and he collided with another driver...who then collided with another driver...etc etc...it really could have been a bad situation...When you attack someone..with the intention of physically harming them...it's called ASSAULT. Regardless of what the children were using as a means to assualt people..it doesn't make their actions any less of a crime. If the children had caused an accident that had taken several people lives...would you then be so inclined to call them "murderers?"
I don't mean to sound like an a-hole..but these children definately need to learn the seriousness of their actions. I believe the police need to spend more time on prosecuting the children, then they do hunting down the man who shot at them. [/B]
Another "if", for everyone keeping score at home. Also, who's to say they INTENDED to assault anyone? They are kids, it was a prank on the side of the road late at night. I don't think they're out to maliciously harm drivers...and no, because an "accident" is precisely that. If you prosecute those kids, you have to prosecute every kid who's ever rolled a house (vandalism), played their music too loud (disturbing the peace), rang and ran (disturbing the peace), asked to mow other peoples lawns (unlicensed services, tax evasion)..etc. THEY ARE KIDS. KIDS DO STUPID SHIT.
Originally posted by PVS
eggs are not a dairy product 😛
Poultry, and it actually weighs closer to 4 ounces. But, you know, factor in mass, velocity, projection, it's more like 5.
Originally posted by botankus
Here's an example where the "driver" is not a wacko.One morning John gets on the roof of a 8-story building and starts urinating off of it onto the pedestrians below. For a good 10 minutes, he is soaking dozens of people walking by with his urine, and when someone figures out where the liquid is coming from, the people down below start yelling obscenities at the whizzer.
The guy on the roof's response is to continue to gush more urine onto everyone, including those that are complaining. One guy has had enough down below. He picks up a rock and throws it up at the guy. It hits him square in the forehead and before he can zip up, he falls 8 stories to his death.
Does the urine-soaked pedestrian deserve to visit Bubba in this case?
1) That guy must have drank a lot to be able to piss for 10 minutes.
2) The other guy must be Roger ****ing Clemens to throw THAT hard and THAT far up.
3) Pissin' Pete deserves jail time post-mortem, and the pedestrian deserves a free shower..with water.