Teen Killed After Tossed Egg Hits Motorist In Face

Originally posted by Bardock42
Totalitarianism can be a good thing..........but I am not in for that.....I don't want the state to punish them for throwing eggs.....but I can laugh at some guy that gets pissed of and shoots one of those pricks...they wouldn't have been a healthy part of society anyways....

Why Shouldn't they be punished when some kid would do that to my car I'd like to see him or her punished, ofcourse not killed or jailed or anything but a nice 100 hours of community service would be a great thing.

Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
1) That guy must have drank a lot to be able to piss for 10 minutes.

2) The other guy must be Roger ****ing Clemens to throw THAT hard and THAT far up.

3) Pissin' Pete deserves jail time post-mortem, and the pedestrian deserves a free shower..with water.

I just checked the story. The guy had drank 2 cases of beer the night before and forgot to take a piss before he passed out. He had just woken up when the whizz-fest began. And he pissed on Pedro Martinez. As far as the shower, maybe the image I attached a few posts ago would be best suited for him.

Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
..and I blame society for gladly accepting rampant violence as a way of retaliation, suggesting kids deserve death for a prank. Regardless of age, it was a prank, and who's to say they knew any better? Apparently they didn't.

I agree. Only this time i can't blame only american society, because apparently people from all over the world consider that the guy was in his right to do that 😬 .....and that's just freaky.

~wickerman~

Originally posted by Fire
Why Shouldn't they be punished when some kid would do that to my car I'd like to see him or her punished, ofcourse not killed or jailed or anything but a nice 100 hours of community service would be a great thing.

I'd say the fair punishment would be for them to face prosecution for vandalism and assault 😬

~wickerman~

Originally posted by botankus
I just checked the story. The guy had drank 2 cases of beer the night before and forgot to take a piss before he passed out. He had just woken up when the whizz-fest began. And he pissed on Pedro Martinez. As far as the shower, maybe the image I attached a few posts ago would be best suited for him.

So, that was a REAL STORY!? 😱

Yes, it was me, in fact. I changed the name from my name to 'John' to protect my privacy.

Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
Another "if", for everyone keeping score at home. Also, who's to say they INTENDED to assault anyone?

If someone is throwing eggs at 11:00 p.m. over a bridge onto a divided highway..I'd take a stab at saying that more than likely..they ain't trying to give away free food..

Common sense dictates that this is an assault on some level, albeit a minor one..but an assault none the less.

They are kids, it was a prank on the side of the road late at night. I don't think they're out to maliciously harm drivers...

Of course they're not. It's obvious that they were trying to promote harmony & world peace, and send a message that world hunger is wrong...🙄

Seriously man. What type of reaction should one expect to happen when throwing projectiles at moving targets? I can guarantee you that these little boitches were hoping for one of the following.

a) an accident.
b) Someone to hop out of the car and start screaming at them.
c) both a & b.

These kids were expecting a negative reaction..and guess what? They got it. I bet you the little sh*theads were probably rolling on the floor laughing when the guy hopped out of the car. Hell..I wouldn't be surpised if they were still yelling/taunting/threatening and throwing eggs at his car up until the point when he pulled gun out and started to fire.

and no, because an "accident" is precisely that. If you prosecute those kids, you have to prosecute every kid who's ever rolled a house (vandalism), played their music too loud (disturbing the peace), rang and ran (disturbing the peace), asked to mow other peoples lawns (unlicensed services, tax evasion)..etc. THEY ARE KIDS. KIDS DO STUPID SHIT.

Kids should be held responsable..and yes PUNISHED if they engage in malicious activities. Not all situations should be relegated as "serious criminal offenses" however, the attitude of..

"Awww shucks..they're just little whipper snappers.."

Does nothing but encourage bad behavior.

Originally posted by botankus
If you show Bubba that you're not going to be his b**ch then that number drops to 97%.

Well but the death thing at least raises to 50% again......

Okay, so you've got a 50-50 chance of dying. I'll take that anyday than the 100% chance of getting Bubbacized.

Originally posted by botankus
Okay, so you've got a 50-50 chance of dying. I'll take that anyday than the 100% chance of getting Bubbacized.

Well 97% to be Bubbaloved....
50+% to be killed (and probably be Bubbacized anyway)

Not that good.....

Oh and when I said no punishment for the egg throwers...I didn't know what I was talking aboot....

I'm gong to take this quite a bit over the top and say that those kids got exactly what they deserved.

No one misses little sh!ts like this when they are gone and society as a whole is now a safer place because you won't have little shit heads throwing eggs which will result in less asshats pulling guns on people.

Oh had sad, someone died! But is it really sad?

Dying of cancer is sad. Being his by a drunk driver is sad. Getting killed playing professional sports is bad. Killing little shits like this isn't sad...it's natural selection.

Originally posted by Cinemaddiction

If..if..if...if. So many of you people are banking on "ifs". Who are you to say? This happened on a RESIDENTIAL STREET IN INDIANAPOLIS. Aside from being physically incapable of "throwing" a boulder, I don't think they're readily available.

And how am i supposed to know that it was a residential street ?
Is it written somewhere in the article ? huh ?

And whaadya mean we should not bank on 'ifs' ? As i said its happened in Europe and the cases where more serious such as boulders and rocks; Read Storm's post about what happened in Belgium. Its with the 'IFS' that you can get to all the worst possible scenarios and its with the 'IFS' that you EDUCATE teenagers.

Originally posted by Cinemaddiction

Again, residential street, driver had his window down, meaning he was either COMPLETELY STOPPED, or the kid had impeccable aim.

How do you know these things ? Did the teens say so ? What is your source please ? I did not read that in the featured article.

Originally posted by Linkalicious
I'm gong to take this quite a bit over the top and say that those kids got exactly what they deserved.

No one misses little sh!ts like this when they are gone and society as a whole is now a safer place because you won't have little shit heads throwing eggs which will result in less asshats pulling guns on people.

Oh had sad, someone died! But is it really sad?

Dying of cancer is sad. Being his by a drunk driver is sad. Getting killed playing professional sports is bad. Killing little shits like this isn't sad...it's natural selection.

Agreed. I still don't believe people should attempt to hurt others, unless theirs/other's lives are in danger.

This whole scenario reminds me of what happened out in my neighborhood a while back. Couple young punks decided to remove stop signs from the middle of busy intersections..needless to say..an accident occured killing several people. The kids were charged with manslaughter..and I believe several spent a few years in jail.

Makes me wish someone had taken a shot at one of them little sh*theads. Could have prevented a lot of unnecessary deaths..

Kids should be held responsable..and yes PUNISHED if they engage in malicious activities. Not all situations should be relegated as "serious criminal offenses" however, the attitude of..

"Awww shucks..they're just little whipper snappers.."

Does nothing but encourage bad behavior.

Yes, kids should be held accountable for their actions to some extent and punished appropriately. However, pulling a gun on some kids for doing something stupid is blatantly an over reaction. There's punishment, and there's murder, big difference.

If you killed every teenager who ever did something stupid then none of us would be here.

very true

Originally posted by whobdamandog
If someone is throwing eggs at 11:00 p.m. over a bridge onto a divided highway..I'd take a stab at saying that more than likely..they ain't trying to give away free food..

One more time, THERE..WAS..NO..BRIDGE. It's 11 o' clock at night on a SUNDAY, when everyone's more than likely ASLEEP and getting ready for WORK the next day. If they intended to cause harm, they would have done it when the street was LITTERED with cars, not a few cars passing by. They also wouldn't have picked a residential road, which is where it took place.

Originally posted by Linkalicious
I'm gong to take this quite a bit over the top and say that those kids got exactly what they deserved.

Throwing eggs equals death in your opinion. Glad you're not in any position of authority, or I'd kill myself before I ever let your morbid, unbalanced mindset effect my future.

Originally posted by GCG
And how am i supposed to know that it was a residential street ?
Is it written somewhere in the article ? huh ?

A picture is worth 1,000 words. The street sign on the right hand side, the stucco fence with bushes, and the powerline pole would suggest it's a residential area. Also note, there's not a bridge. 😱

Originally posted by GCG
And whaadya mean we should not bank on 'ifs' ? As i said its happened in Europe and the cases where more serious such as boulders and rocks; Read Storm's post about what happened in Belgium. Its with the 'IFS' that you can get to all the worst possible scenarios and its with the 'IFS' that you EDUCATE teenagers.

YOUR if's suggested that had they gotten away with it, it would have escalated to to boulders or rocks. How do you know that? You don't, and neither do I, but you're the one claiming it would have gone farther.

Originally posted by BackFire

If you killed every teenager who ever did something stupid then none of us would be here.

Nah, apparently Link's a perfect angel.

Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
One more time, THERE..WAS..NO..BRIDGE. It's 11 o' clock at night on a SUNDAY, when everyone's more than likely ASLEEP and getting ready for WORK the next day.

Are you psychic? Were you at the seen of the crime? Or do you happen to be one of the kids?

The article never directly states that it was not a residential road. And they never specifically state where the kids were when they threw the eggs at the cars.

If they intended to cause harm, they would have done it when the street was LITTERED with cars, not a few cars passing by.

Yes..yes..they would have loved to have been out in broad daylight..where everyone could have seen and identified who they were... and it would have been great publicity for their campaign against world hunger..🙄 This is another big assumption on your part...one where common sense is not being applied.

Now answer this question for me. If a group of people you don't know throw something at you at 11:00 pm at night as you're driving your car..would the first assumption that came to your mind be....

"They don't mean me any harm?"

Throwing eggs equals death in your opinion. Glad you're not in any position of authority, or I'd kill myself before I ever let your morbid, unbalanced mindset effect my future.

Assaulting people equals "JOKE" in your opinion. I'm glad someone like you is not in a position of authority either, because I'd hate to have a friend or loved one die because of a malicious "JOKE" that went awry.

The real "JOKE" would be when the case was presented to someone like yourself..and the children were given a slap on the wrist..with the real victims given the simple response of..." children will be children..."

A picture is worth 1,000 words. The street sign on the right hand side, the stucco fence with bushes, and the powerline pole would suggest it's a residential area. Also note, there's not a bridge. 😱

YOUR if's suggested that had they gotten away with it, it would have escalated to to boulders or rocks. How do you know that? You don't, and neither do I, but you're the one claiming it would have gone farther.

No one knows what would have eventually happened..but again.."common sense" dictates that the likelihood of something more serious happening was definately there.

I've been on many major interstate..yes that's right "interstate" highways that have had street signs and powerline poles. But "where" the children were is really a moot point. It doesn't change the fact that their actions were illegal, and their intentions were to in some way HARM the individuals who they were throwing eggs at.

Originally posted by KidRock
''Two Indianapolis teens were shot, one fatally, after a tossed egg struck a motorist in the face.

Police said the teens were throwing eggs at cars Sunday night at about 11 p.m. when an egg hit an unidentified driver in the head.

The driver stopped, got out of the car and opened fire, witnesses said.

He shot one boy in the leg and another in the stomach as the group ran from the scene, according to the report.

When the two uninjured boys realized one friend was missing, they returned to the scene and found 15-year-old Brandon Dunson dead.

The group admitted their prank to police and gave them a description of the shooter and his vehicle.

"I think they should find him (the shooter)," egg-thrower James Patterson said. "I don't know where he is right now, but I hope he regrets what he did because he just shot a minor over some eggs. He didn't have to take it to the extreme."

Police said a man called them to report the egg-throwing kids. They believe he may have been the same man involved in the boy's death.

Investigators were trying to locate him Monday.''

http://www.local6.com/news/4766702/detail.html

Pretty ****ing harsh.

I can't speak for the validity of the guy who called in, but I know I wouldn't have done the same. I would have chaulked it up to the fact that no adult would have done this kind of thing. I would never have shot the poor kids. So...yeah. kinda harsh.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
Are you psychic? Were you at the seen of the crime? Or do you happen to be one of the kids?

The article never directly states that it was not a residential road. And they never specifically state where the kids were when they threw the eggs at the cars.

Now answer this question for me. If a group of people you don't know throw something at you at 11:00 pm at night as you're driving your car..would the first assumption that came to your mind be....

"They don't mean me any harm?"

Assaulting people equals "JOKE" in your opinion. I'm glad someone like you is not in a position of authority either, because I'd hate to have a friend or loved one die because of a malicious "JOKE" that went awry.

The real "JOKE" would be when the case was presented to someone like yourself..and the children were given a slap on the wrist..with the real victims given the simple response of..." children will be children..."

No one knows what would have eventually happened..but again.."common sense" dictates that the likelihood of something more serious happening was definately there.

I've been on many major interstate..yes that's right "interstate" highways that have had street signs and powerline poles. But "where" the children were is really a moot point. It doesn't change the fact that their actions were illegal, and their intentions were to in some way HARM the individuals who they were throwing eggs at.

The article doesn't need to state shit. The picture shows there's no bridge, that it's right in a residential area, and common ****ing sense tells you that a residential street isn't busy near MIDNIGHT on a SUNDAY NIGHT when people have to go to work/school the next day. But, then again, common sense also tells you that you're not supposed to open fire on kids throwing eggs, so I guess it isn't so common.

Yeah, my first assumption is that it's kids being kids. I'd be angry, but I'm not stupid enough to kill children over it. Assaulting people doesn't equal a "joke" in my opinion. Had the person who was "assaulted" died, it's a totally different story, but they didn't, rendering your scenario invalid. Someone DID die, and it was a kid, by someone who wrongfully took offense to a prank.

If they were out to hurt someone "maliciously", you really think EGGS were the way to go? Why not rocks? Why not A GUN? Why not a slingshot? Why not water balloons? All of which would have a MUCH, MUCH more significant impact on the operator of a motor vehicle? Why not? Because I highly doubt they were out to hurt innocent people with their prank.

The kids location isn't a moot point, either. The speed limit plays a major factor, as does road signage. i.e. the driver had to be going pretty slow, if not stopped, for the egger to nail the guy dead in the head, the driver driving slow enough to stop, get out of his car, take out a gun, and hit TWO kids while they're running. Location makes a big, big difference, infact. You couldn't do that on any highway, where the average speed limit is 55 MPH. If you can, you must be S.W.A.T.

Here's a little supporting evidence for the whole residential claim..

Capt. Phil Burton, spokesman for the Marion County Sheriff's Department, said a deputy called to the shooting scene near Rockville and Girls School roads..

The Sungate Homeowners Association, which represents residents just southeast of the shooting site, warned its members this summer about recent vandalism. The association's July newsletter said. "So far this summer there have been incidents as minor as prank vandalism like egging homes, to theft."

Prank, as I said..

Dyer said the driver yelled, "I'm going to shoot you!"

"I heard somebody yell, 'Everybody get down! Get down!' " the teen recalled Tuesday.

Deputies say after one of those eggs hit a motorist's truck, that the driver used his truck to chase the teens into a parking lot of a storage facility just west of Girls School Road and Rockville Road.

So, he was intent on mowing these kids down originally, cornering them in a parking lot of a GATED storage facility,THEN resorted to opening fire?

Well, that's all I wanted to share. Just to clarify it was residential, no highway, no bridge, and the driver is ****ing insane.