Woman admits having sex parties for teen boys

CorderaMitchell> “I'm not so sure that deep down all men naturally like these things, because there are many who find it wrong, be it now or later “
No, not ALL men. Of course not. But I wrote “on average”. We’re dealing with broad lines here…

“Merely since it is practice and custom, and is in fact PARTIALLY true.”
But you, see… that’s not true. The idea that men are more sexual creatures than women is simply wrong an outdated. What turns the two genders ON – on average – is NOT the same thing. So the argument, that since women don’t hang around in male stripbars, read porn, and sit in XXX-booths equals less interest or desire for sex simply shows, that men do NOT understand, that women ARE as sexual, but are turned ON by other things.

“Procreation!!!!! Thats the key word here, to have 50 men on an island with one woman would be a failed mission, because a woman is built to come pregnant once at a time, despite the sperm deposited.”
Ah, and old and long-lived fallacy. Yes, one man could impregnate many women, but if he is not there to “bring home the beef”, when the woman is very pregnant, has the child, and for a long time after, while she cares for the infant, then both woman and child would – in the cave-world where our instincts were bred – DIE. No procreation, no genes spread, no nothing.
But today we humans also know that sex can be FUN, and do it without wanting to have kids. Humans are not “in heat”, women can have sexual desires during their period. So the procreation-story only goes that far to explain anything.

Men and women alike crave attention. We women need to decide if “that guy” is the alpha-male, are the genes good, hence the reason we like to have conversation – on average – before we go home.

Originally posted by The Omega
CorderaMitchell> “I'm not so sure that deep down all men naturally like these things, because there are many who find it wrong, be it now or later “
No, not ALL men. Of course not. But I wrote “on average”. We’re dealing with broad lines here…

“Merely since it is practice and custom, and is in fact PARTIALLY true.”
But you, see… that’s not true. The idea that men are more sexual creatures than women is simply wrong an outdated. What turns the two genders ON – on average – is NOT the same thing. So the argument, that since women don’t hang around in male stripbars, read porn, and sit in XXX-booths equals less interest or desire for sex simply shows, that men do NOT understand, that women ARE as sexual, but are turned ON by other things.

“Procreation!!!!! Thats the key word here, to have 50 men on an island with one woman would be a failed mission, because a woman is built to come pregnant once at a time, despite the sperm deposited.”
Ah, and old and long-lived fallacy. Yes, one man could impregnate many women, but if he is not there to “bring home the beef”, when the woman is very pregnant, has the child, and for a long time after, while she cares for the infant, then both woman and child would – in the cave-world where our instincts were bred – DIE. No procreation, no genes spread, no nothing.
But today we humans also know that sex can be FUN, and do it without wanting to have kids. Humans are not “in heat”, women can have sexual desires during their period. So the procreation-story only goes that far to explain anything.

Men and women alike crave attention. We women need to decide if “that guy” is the alpha-male, are the genes good, hence the reason we like to have conversation – on average – before we go home.

I pretty much agree with what you are saying here, I'm not saying the beliefs are CORRECT, I'm saying that they are the fuel for present beliefs, not that they are correct.

Originally posted by The Omega
CorderaMitchell> “I'm not so sure that deep down all men naturally like these things, because there are many who find it wrong, be it now or later “
No, not ALL men. Of course not. But I wrote “on average”. We’re dealing with broad lines here…

“Merely since it is practice and custom, and is in fact PARTIALLY true.”
But you, see… that’s not true. The idea that men are more sexual creatures than women is simply wrong an outdated. What turns the two genders ON – on average – is NOT the same thing. So the argument, that since women don’t hang around in male stripbars, read porn, and sit in XXX-booths equals less interest or desire for sex simply shows, that men do NOT understand, that women ARE as sexual, but are turned ON by other things.

“Procreation!!!!! Thats the key word here, to have 50 men on an island with one woman would be a failed mission, because a woman is built to come pregnant once at a time, despite the sperm deposited.”
Ah, and old and long-lived fallacy. Yes, one man could impregnate many women, but if he is not there to “bring home the beef”, when the woman is very pregnant, has the child, and for a long time after, while she cares for the infant, then both woman and child would – in the cave-world where our instincts were bred – DIE. No procreation, no genes spread, no nothing.
But today we humans also know that sex can be FUN, and do it without wanting to have kids. Humans are not “in heat”, women can have sexual desires during their period. So the procreation-story only goes that far to explain anything.

Men and women alike crave attention. We women need to decide if “that guy” is the alpha-male, are the genes good, hence the reason we like to have conversation – on average – before we go home.

Actually, I'm ready to say something and be fair to the time you spent in your post...

I agree 100% that it isnt fair to treat women as ANY less than humans, and as such, I hold no malice towards a woman. A person should be treated by what they say, and how they act. Their character.

Yes, its the way things are, reproduction and such, but I must agree that society benefits women as well.

They get benefits from these "beliefs", its a double edged sword.

For instance, why don't women get drafted into the army? I went, and I felt it was a responsibility for my country, but women don't HAVE to go. Why?

" Women are childbearers..."'

Also, its okay for women to talk about how attractive a guy is, even at work, its no big deal.

Let a guy talk about how a woman looks, and its usually deemed offensive, or sexual harassment.

Sometimes even a guy (I'll use myself for example), can get scolded for telling a girl that they were pretty. Why? I meant no harm there, but today to protect ladies, and even school customs, have a 0%tolerance to that, and see it as harassment.

A girl can tell me I'm very handsome, and no one cares.

Also, in a thread yesterday, someone made a joke about what women were good for "sex, laundry, etc.", and it was deemed offensive. Let a girl make a joke thread about men being only good for sex, and noone would deem it really offensive, it would be harmless fun, shits and giggles.

Furthermore, its not a big deal for girls to make a "rate my rack" thread, but on another thread, someone made a "hot chick thread",people jumped on it saying it was offensive, and it got closed.

So in conclusion, yes its unfair how customs hold, but its for BOTH side, not just one.

She did plead guilty to the misdemeanors and 9 counts of felonies. Her sentencing is Sept. 26th and she is getting at least 56 years to life in prison.

Her excuse was that she was an outcast in highschool, therefore, she wanted a "Cool Image" to make up for years lost.

But at the expense of others.

There are millions of outcasts that graduate every year and make something of themselves in a positive light. No one holds excuses from the past but makes a better life for themselves and their families.

Personally, life in prison is the easy way out. I prefer the death penalty.

Indeed...

Originally posted by CaptJackSparr0w
She did plead guilty to the misdemeanors and 9 counts of felonies. Her sentencing is Sept. 26th and she is getting at least 56 years to life in prison.

Her excuse was that she was an outcast in highschool, therefore, she wanted a "Cool Image" to make up for years lost.

But at the expense of others.

There are millions of outcasts that graduate every year and make something of themselves in a positive light. No one holds excuses from the past but makes a better life for themselves and their families.

Personally, life in prison is the easy way out. I prefer the death penalty.

thanks for the update 🙂

Yep..

Wow that's a heavy sentence.

I try, its not as deep as yours though...

I think he was talkin about the jail sentence? 😑

Sorry, correction. She can recieve up to 58 years, not life, but if she recieves the full 58 years, that would make her about 98(I think she is 40 yrs) when she is eligible for parole so it would be a life sentence anyway.

9 felonies and 2 misdemeanors out of 4. 2 for distributing meth were dropped.

Sorry for the misprint

Originally posted by MC Mike
I think he was talkin about the jail sentence? 😑

I thought he was being sarcastic... 😆

Originally posted by CaptJackSparr0w
she is getting at least 56 years to life in prison.

Well imagine if a guy did the same thing, the lady memebers ARE asking for equal treatment, so...

Originally posted by SlipknoT
That is ****ed up, I can Understand 1-2 years but 56 to life?

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Well imagine if a guy did the same thing, the lady memebers ARE asking for equal treatment, so...

I agree totally Cordera. If this had of been a guy screwing 15 yearold chicks and giving them drugs and alcohol he would not have only recieved a heavy sentence, but alsso would have gotten a tonne more exposure in the media and would have been held up as an example by feminists or some other special interest groups.

As stupid as this woman is, she got the same sentence as a male would have, you do the crime.....

Originally posted by KharmaDog
I agree totally Cordera. If this had of been a guy screwing 15 yearold chicks and giving them drugs and alcohol he would not have only recieved a heavy sentence, but alsso would have gotten a tonne more exposure in the media and would have been held up as an example by feminists or some other special interest groups.

As stupid as this woman is, she got the same sentence as a male would have, you do the crime.....

yup yup

Gotta give people what they ask for...

Get her over here.
YASSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!

CoderaMitchel> “I agree 100% that it isnt fair to treat women as ANY less than humans, and as such, I hold no malice towards a woman.”
And now you lost me completely. Since when have we been discussing whether or not women or men are less than the other gender??

“For instance, why don't women get drafted into the army? I went, and I felt it was a responsibility for my country, but women don't HAVE to go. Why?”
Good question! I think men and women alike should be drafted, as long as a country holds a draft.

“Also, in a thread yesterday, someone made a joke about what women were good for "sex, laundry, etc.", and it was deemed offensive. Let a girl make a joke thread about men being only good for sex, and no one would deem it really offensive, it would be harmless fun, shits and giggles.”
Yeah, but you’re missing the equivalent to “laundry” here. But I’m still somewhat at a loss now. We were discussing whether or not women are as sexually active as men, so I’m having some problems seeing your point.

Originally posted by The Omega
CoderaMitchel> “I agree 100% that it isnt fair to treat women as ANY less than humans, and as such, I hold no malice towards a woman.”
And now you lost me completely. Since when have we been discussing whether or not women or men are less than the other gender??

“For instance, why don't women get drafted into the army? I went, and I felt it was a responsibility for my country, but women don't HAVE to go. Why?”
Good question! I think men and women alike should be drafted, as long as a country holds a draft.

“Also, in a thread yesterday, someone made a joke about what women were good for "sex, laundry, etc.", and it was deemed offensive. Let a girl make a joke thread about men being only good for sex, and no one would deem it really offensive, it would be harmless fun, shits and giggles.”
Yeah, but you’re missing the equivalent to “laundry” here. But I’m still somewhat at a loss now. We were discussing whether or not women are as sexually active as men, so I’m having some problems seeing your point.

The same misconceptions that has men as " more sexually active" are the same ones that have men as " predators".

I am glad you agree about the draft though...