Sex Every where/NoFreeWill/We all going to hell

Started by vaya_the_elf10 pages

Originally posted by Bardock42
But that are all societys ideas....there is no reason why it couldn't be a community oof people that love each other and have sex and raise their kids......and it would mean just as much cause it is the same act...people just peretend that it means more....maybe the first time...maybe...but after that it is just sex....it is just like saying from now on I will only eat toast because that makes it a more special trelationship.

And On teh contrary you take more eresponsebility for your action when there is no almighty god who planned everything and knows what will happen next.....

Sex social 😂 . Sorry, but I find kind of funny.
I don't think it should be social matter, and I think it would be more of this guy got so many people to have sex with him. Thats what it would turn into. People are not very mature about sex, so I don't think it would a very wise idea.

Even if people do pretend it means more.. . Why not?
Rather it was like that than it being some social thing. Sometimes living in a dream is not so bad.

oh no, don't let this turn into the anger thread.

Originally posted by cking
the easter bunny is just a retarded figure created by man. God doesn't do stupid things, we do stupid things and we get what we deserve, when we had the chance to do what is right. God cares for us because he loves us.

god is just a retarded figure created by men...with the next sentence I agree, for the last you refer to the first part....

Originally posted by Gotham Girl
yes I NOTICE when you TYPE things in CAPITAL.

Now you comparing God to the easter Bunny.

I sense anger

So you realize when I post in Capitals but you don't realize what I post ....great...what aboot argueing instead of talking aboot sometjhing completely differen?

Originally posted by Bardock42
god is just a retarded figure created by men...with the next sentence I agree, for the last you refer to the first part....

So you realize when I post in Capitals but you don't realize what I post ....great...what aboot argueing instead of talking aboot sometjhing completely differen?

You dont even argue with respect.

You compared God to the easter bunny.
You called God a retarted figure made by people.

back then in Jewish history, back before Jesus times that would be blasphemy, and worthy of being stoned to death, but no worries that is in the past, but I wouldn't be saying that back then or around Jewish people to this day.

Originally posted by vaya_the_elf
Sex social 😂 . Sorry, but I find kind of funny.
I don't think it should be social matter, and I think it would be more of this guy got so many people to have sex with him. Thats what it would turn into. People are not very mature about sex, so I don't think it would a very wise idea.

Even if people do pretend it means more.. . Why not?
Rather it was like that than it being some social thing. Sometimes living in a dream is not so bad.

Well you can have your one person thingies...let others have what they want....it doesn't matter if you think sex shouldn't be a social thing...its alone those peoples decision....

Well and you can have that deream...but relize that for other people it is just as special if they do it with different partners....

Originally posted by Gotham Girl
You dont even argue with respect.

You compared God to the easter bunny.
You called God a retarted figure made by people.

I argue with respect..I do have respect for you and your posts.....nothing more...I won't have respect for your Imaginated Friends.....

Plus he called the Easter Bunny a retarded figure...wheres there the respect....

Oh and you don't argue at all....you just talk aboot crappy sideshow stuff...

Originally posted by cking
back then in Jewish history, back before Jesus times that would be blasphemy, and worthy of being stoned to death, but no worries that is in the past, but I wouldn't be saying that back then or around Jewish people to this day.

You make no sense...and back in the roman days this would be reason for crucifying....

Originally posted by Bardock42
I argue with respect..I do have respect for you and your posts.....nothing more...I won't have respect for your Imaginated Friends.....

Plus he called the Easter Bunny a retarded figure...wheres there the respect....

Oh and you don't argue at all....you just talk aboot crappy sideshow stuff...

You make no sense...and back in the roman days this would be reason for crucifying....

Yeah thats realyly respecting my posts that say imaginary friends. If you dont like imaginary friends, and dont beleive in anything religion related, then why are you here.

in the Jewish law it says that if any person has any blasphemous words against god or misuse his name must be stoned to death, it is true, just giving you the facts of what they did back then. the Romans never cared if a person made fun of him or not because they worshiped other figures and they hated the Jewish law.

Originally posted by Gotham Girl
Yeah thats realyly respecting my posts that say imaginary friends. If you dont like imaginary friends, and dont beleive in anything religion related, then why are you here.

Cause I like to debate...its not a "Only religious People Forum" but a "Religion Discussion Forum" sorry if you don't like that......and that is my opinion...it is not a real thing this God Studd...its imagined.....if you don't like that opinion...why read it...why start a thread to discuss?

Originally posted by Gotham Girl
Yeah thats realyly respecting my posts that say imaginary friends. If you dont like imaginary friends, and dont beleive in anything religion related, then why are you here.

There are over 100 different texts that weren't included in the cannon of scripture...If you've read those others, you'd see a different Jesus. What we have today was inserted, forced, edited into what we now call our Bible....It's not a true representation of what God is at all...And Jesus was not called god until it was deemed so in 324 AD.

the Romans hated the Jewish law? 😑

If anything, they hated any other law. It is already an exception that they were allowed to keep their religion and that they didn't mingle in that much

Originally posted by yerssot
the Romans hated the Jewish law? 😑

If anything, they hated any other law. It is already an exception that they were allowed to keep their religion and that they didn't mingle in that much

Well there was a time when All religions were accepted by the Roman Empire...that's why it worked so well, that is until near the end when they tried to force the other beliefs out....Near the end there they had some strange Caesars...Then down came Rome..

Originally posted by debbiejo
There are over 100 different texts that weren't included in the cannon of scripture...If you've read those others, you'd see a different Jesus. What we have today was inserted, forced, edited into what we now call our Bible....It's not a true representation of what God is at all...And Jesus was not called god until it was deemed so in 324 AD.

Then argue that, but the other guy says hes no different from the easter bunny.

Tell me what jesus was before the other scripts

the Romans never liked the Jews because of the rebellions and because their law wasn't the same as theirs. the Romans did allow them to keep the law and religion.

Originally posted by debbiejo
Well there was a time when All religions were accepted by the Roman Empire...that's why it worked so well, that is until near the end when they tried to force the other beliefs out....Near the end there they had some strange Caesars...Then down came Rome..

No you misunderstood that...the Romans accepted this Jehova thing first because trhey accept all gods...but for Christians and Jews itr is the ONLY god which makes it kind ogf hard to accept it (him/her/god).......

Originally posted by Gotham Girl
Then argue that, but the other guy says hes no different from the easter bunny.

Tell me what jesus was before the other scripts

I never said Jesus is liek the Easter Bunny.....I said God was.....well God is just like MacBeth, Batman, Jane Eyre, .... all fictinous characters....

same thing.

Originally posted by cking
same thing.

exactly.....

Originally posted by debbiejo
Well there was a time when All religions were accepted by the Roman Empire...that's why it worked so well, that is until near the end when they tried to force the other beliefs out....Near the end there they had some strange Caesars...Then down came Rome..

all religions? that's in; I believe after 350 BC yes.
I don't et what you mean with forcing the other beliefs out and strange caesars