Best 60s band

Started by RogerRamjet7 pages
Originally posted by intoxicatedpoet
It was the greatest ****in' era of music, you can think of something.

****'in right you are...maybe you'd might add Led Zeppelin, Canned Heat, Johnny Winter and THe Rolling Stones to the chart...🙂

Serioulsy, the beatles was the most important group of the pop/rock era. Most influential, best group, etc.

Originally posted by bakerboy
Serioulsy, the beatles was the most important group of the pop/rock era. Most influential, best group, etc.

Try giving reasons instead of sounding like a broken record.

Well they're factually not the best technically, or originally. So he must be speaking from a strictly biased P.O.V.

-AC

Why dont you try on post why they wasnt? Because you are the ones who are sounding like a broken record, posting all the time that they werent and not why they werent.

Its so easy, try to back to the first 60s, they were the first tennage group, they were the first popular band, they were the first band who mixed various styles: pop, rock, ballad, and the hippie style in the 70s. Best composer band, any band have three talents like lennon, macartney and harrison composing in the same group. First band on use the videoclip. Their albums style were revolutionary. They did albums like revolver with 20 or 22 years old, never any another band was so musically mature at that age. First group the use the video clip, most versioned group, most selled group in story, even 35 years later of his end as a group, etc. Do you want more???

And now, your reasons on why they werent

Originally posted by bakerboy
Why dont you try on post why they wasnt?

If you are claiming they are, you have the burden of proof.

And i posted it.

Both camps have- is still inconclusive. Which is surprising because AC is especially camp.

Originally posted by bakerboy
Why dont you try on post why they wasnt? Because you are the ones who are sounding like a broken record, posting all the time that they werent and not why they werent.

Obviously missed the point where I proved why, in my many posts.

Originally posted by bakerboy
Its so easy, try to back to the first 60s, they were the first tennage group, they were the first popular band, they were the first band who mixed various styles: pop, rock, ballad, and the hippie style in the 70s. Best composer band, any band have three talents like lennon, macartney and harrison composing in the same group.

First boyband, so? That doesn't make them the most original band ever to exist in terms of the music they make. If you look before them, you can clearly see their influences and pinpoint music that they weaved in with their own style.

Being the first band to become ultra popular worldwide does not make you the most original sounding band ever does it? No it doesn't.

Originally posted by bakerboy
First band on use the videoclip.

We're talking about music being made. Not how many girls can scream at them.

Originally posted by bakerboy
Their albums style were revolutionary. They did albums like revolver with 20 or 22 years old, never any another band was so musically mature at that age.

Mike Patton was 23 when Mr. Bungle (the most original band of all time) made their debut. There's more musical innovation and genius in their debut than in most albums ever. Never before had there been a band who influenced so many styles and created so many styles within their own. Jumping from hard rock, to jazz, to funk, to metal, to whatever else they chose to work with. That's not opinion. Faith No More's The Real Thing came out when Patton was in his early 20s. That album single handedly helped create and influence many of the bands that are looked to as legends now. Metallica for example.

So not only are Beatles not the most original sounding by far, they're definately not the most influential. You haven't even heard or heard OF Mr. Bungle so I suggest you do that before commenting.

Rush are a million times more talented than The Beatles can ever hope of being. So are Faith No More, Opeth, Tool, Dream Theatre, Radiohead...I could go on forever.

Originally posted by bakerboy
First group the use the video clip

This again....it's not relevant.

Originally posted by bakerboy
most versioned group, most selled group in story, even 35 years later of his end as a group, etc. Do you want more???

I would like more that shows why you still believe they are the best band to ever grace Earth. Because all you are showing is how popular they were, you're not proving half of what you claim.

Originally posted by bakerboy
And now, your reasons on why they werent

I've gave you mine, for the 4th time. Now answer the following questions:

/Why do you wrongly think that The Beatles are the most original band of all time WITH REGARDS TO THE MUSIC THEY MADE?

/Why do you wrongly think they are the most influential? Besides the fact that loads of bands and artists just say "The Beatles" to sound credible.

/Why do you also wrongly believe that they are the most talented on their instruments?

None of this BS about the video clip, being popular among many girls, or being teenagers. This is about music. So answer those questions.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Faith No More's The Real Thing came out when Patton was in his early 20s. That album single handedly helped create and influence many of the bands that are looked to as legends now. Metallica for example.

-AP

Although they had already released 4 albums when The Real Thing came out. 😖hifty:

Yeah but that wasn't with Patton.

And stop calling me AP.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Yeah but that wasn't with Patton.

And stop calling me AP.

-AP

What wasn't with Patton? What are you on about?

Oh you meant Metallica, I thought you meant Faith No More.

Yes I know. Still were influenced, according to Uncle Jim.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Oh you meant Metallica, I thought you meant Faith No More.

Yes I know. Still were influenced, according to Uncle Jim.

-AP

Pre-Patton.

Yeah I know, but only part of my point was highlighting Patton. The point was showing that again, The Beatles aren't the most influential band. Because they aren't.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Yeah I know, but only part of my point was highlighting Patton. The point was showing that again, The Beatles aren't the most influential band. Because they aren't.

-AP

The whole point was about The Real Thing you mug. Read it.

Yeah, that album did influence Metallica also, so said Uncle Jim.

Shitron.

-AC

Laugh if everyone in this thread just started kicking you indiscriminately. Following each jerky retaliation with another kick.

Hahaha, never ceases to amaze me how much of a shitcase you are.

-AC

before we continue this debate about patton influencing metallica...i'd like to point out that in recent years lars said that oasis were one their biggest influences...

didn't really have much to do with the patton issue...but i thought i'd mention it