T. Hord v A. Pall v M. Ragnos v N. Sadow v L. Kressh v F. Nadd

How the hell do Force Powers leave you defenseless? A good one will knock your opponent cold. And how do YOU back up your arguments. "Lick Ass." "You Suck." "Come Back With More Brain Cells." Excellent work.

Now listen, and listen good. A lightsaber, a weightless, mass-less beam of plasma, isn't going to defend you very well against a dude with a 100 lb. sword who can swing that thing around like it's a sunflower. Not to mention that the sword can shoot bolts of lightning from its tip when its user feels. So, Tulak's saber advantages are pwned. Now, I'm not saying he's weak, or an easy victory. But against Ragnos, or Naga, who's Force Power can presumably kill him one-on-one, he's toast.

Now, that's not my best post. Not by far. But the sheer idiocy of this thread, and its creator, is starting to take its toll. By the way, you still haven't answered my question as to which of my few threads suck. You haven't even read one.

the thread which only got 6 replys

that sucked

Which would be . . .

First, off, STFU already. You have no business coming in here and talking shit to everyone and everything.

Second, you take one thread he makes and throw it out there and avoid hsi other thread with over 1200 replies. Nice homework, dumbass.

Third, I suggest you either tone your attitude down or get out, because I've had it up to here with you smart ass mouth.

First, Janus you are a geek and don't try to argue with me it's clear you can't.

Second, Windu has probably had some great threads im sure. my point was that my first 2 was better than one of his recent ones and he has probab;y been on this for years.

Third, im reporting you just like you did when i said a$$

First, you came in here slinging insults, not me.

Second, you insulted him out of spite. You were wrong and you should admit it.

Third, you do that.

windu force powers do not leave you defenceless in one to one duels but in this sort of duel it does because you have to concentrate hard on dealing damage when there are 5 other people who can easily strike you down while you are using concentration. oh and have you ever heard of a little something called resisting force powers.

I've been on this for a month yesterday genius. And all your threads suck. The only reason you're getting replies now is because Janus and I are trying to get you out of this misconception that Tulak owns.

ANd everyone has some threads that get ignored, like your Plo/Cin thread is right now. So you'd better watch it with this holier-than-thou crap, because it's getting old, and fast.

Not to mention that I have a thread up right now with 260 replies.

Janus that is not true i came in here and my argument was with windu not you, you were first to come to his defence and sling insults at me. So as i said before try and think before you reply to me.

my plo cin thread got 18 replys more than ur last one

Originally posted by tommy vercetti
windu force powers do not leave you defenceless in one to one duels but in this sort of duel it does because you have to concentrate hard on dealing damage when there are 5 other people who can easily strike you down while you are using concentration. oh and have you ever heard of a little something called resisting force powers.

Oh and have you ever heard of "not really." It is doubtful that Hord can stand up to Ragnos in a Force battle. Possible, but doubtful. And jeez, have you seen the movies? Dooku raises his hand and chucks Anakin across the room in a barrage of lightning. Obi blocks it, and so does Yoda. But Ragnos would dwarf Dooku so bad it's not even funny in Force Power. He'd crush YODA for God's sake.

And in a six-person battle, it's most likely to be divided up into three tw-on-two's. As it is, you've devolved this battle into Tulak vs. Ragnos.

So now we're debating who has better threads? Ask around if it's that important to you.

Oh for crying out load, just stay on topic already..

Pall or Ragnos wins, most likely Ragnos because evidence shows he is the most powerful of all.

i did not divide this fight between tulak and ragnos, i just think that tulak would win and you think ragnos so therefor i am involving the two of them but my reasons for tulak winning and ragnos not has involved the other 4 this whole thread. The fact is you have not seemed to grasp the idea of what a royal rumble involves you idiot. at the end of the day we both think that we are right and so its up for others to decide but considering that you seem to have relationships with all of them means we cant get a non biased answer. I can guarantee if we got 10 random guys to decide they would go with me and you can deny that all you want bit it wont be true

oh and by the way windu this is my second thread and it has the potential to get as many replys as your highest thread and you have been making threads for years

Originally posted by tommy vercetti
oh and by the way windu this is my second thread and it has the potential to get as many replys as your highest thread and you have been making threads for years

You're an idiot. He's been here since June.

First off, lay off on the insults. Here, we debate, not argue. So sraighten yourself out before someone does it for you. You've been reported three times in your first day as it is. Good job.

ANd I'm not biased. I've presented my opinion, which apparently isn't good enough for you, throughout this crappy thread. And Fishy agreea with me, Janus agrees with me, etc. I didn't come on here to have a popularity contest with you. So you go gather them ten people. I'm outta here.

July.

I've been here a month yesterday.