Originally posted by Lana
If it has NO evidence to back it up, yet someone believes it, it is their OPINION that it is true. It is neither theory nor fact.
It could be called a theory based on the evidence that it looks flat, therefore I think it's flat.
The point is, from that theory people can form the belief that it is flat (without actual evidence to prove so).
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
How could it BE VERIFIED? THE EARTH IS ROUND.
that was a misundersanding... i meant he verified it was round.
ok lets look at this
The world is Flat
Which Definition fits better?
Opinion : A thought or Judgement which Cannot be Verified.
Theory : An Assumption made with Limited Knowledge.
Verify: To determine or test the truth or accuracy of, as by comparison, investigation, or reference.
They Verified the world is round...so therefore they verified the truth, or accuracy of the statement "the world is Flat" nope doesn match the definition of opinion
Assumption : Something taken for granted or accepted as true without proof.
Did they have proof the world was Flat? Nope. Was it accepted ? YES by most back then. DOes this match the definition of Theory? Yes it does actually.
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
It's enough evidence on which to base an erroneous theory...The theory of geocentricity was based more upon vanity than any real observation.
True.....
But you could say that watching the sun rise in the east, arc through the sky, and set in the west could be 'observing' it revolve around the Earth.
Originally posted by Pezmerga
that was a misundersanding... i meant he verified it was round.ok lets look at this
The world is Flat
Which Definition fits better?
Opinion : A thought or Judgement which Cannot be Verified.
Theory : An Assumption made with Limited Knowledge.
Verify: To determine or test the truth or accuracy of, as by comparison, investigation, or reference.
They Verified the world is round...so therefore they verified the truth, or accuracy of the statement "the world is Flat" nope doesn match the definition of opinion
Assumption : Something taken for granted or accepted as true without proof.
Did they have proof the world was Flat? Nope. Was it accepted ? YES by most back then. DOes this match the definition of Theory? Yes it does actually.
What was that?
Here's a theory for you. Imagine this debate is metaphorically placed inside the universe, in correct proportions away from your misunderstanding of it.
If the debate was...in Oxford Street. The top end, down near Selfridges. Yes, let's theorize that the debate is placed inside Selfridges, near the cosmetics counter (the front one).
In relation, your understanding of the debate would be just beyond the planet Saturn.
Originally posted by Pezmerga
I give up think what you want....go ask a professor or something.
Hahaha, "go ask a professor". You have no idea who you're talking to.
Originally posted by Pezmerga
Opinions are neither right or wrong. bye , I dont know why im even arguing on this board lmao its a music discussion forum.
They can be wrong, they can be proven wrong.
It's been proven to you and many other people.
-AC
Originally posted by Pezmerga
yeah whatever A.C. you are a professor i guess. dont make u right.
it hasnt been proven to me, wont be proven either.
New levels of stupidity. "Go ask a professor", "you are a professor i guess, dont make u right."
Your continual denying of it, your constant non-acceptance of being shredded not withstanding, you did get proven wrong. That's a fact.
Originally posted by Pezmerga
Opinions and Facts are just types of statements. SOciets warped their definitions. Do some research on it. Look in an oxford English Dictionary or something.
Yep, just looked. Pretty much backs up everything we've said.
You're wrong, you've lost. Leave. Send in JKS Hammer.
-AC
Why do you have to be a dick about it? I dont see you having any proof that it backs you, nor do i think you actually have a OED . Anyway Im not wrong, whatever just drop it cuz i find on forums no one ever admits to being wrong. /shrug so we will both argue forever.
Anyway back to actual music Discussion...anyone else find it Atrocious that the Rolling Stones are #67!!!!!!!!!!!!
I mean The New York Dolls and Joan Jett are ahead of them! Stones should be Top 15 at LEAST, on my list anyway.
Originally posted by jks
Off of that list..
1. Led Zeppelin
2. Black Sabbath
3. Jimi Hendrix
4. AC/DC
5. Metallica
6. Nirvana
7. Van Halen
9. Guns N' Roses
10. KISS
11. Aerosmith
12. The Sex Pistols
13. Queen
17. The Ramones
18. Ozzy Osbourne
20. Alice Cooper
26. Motorhead
31. Def Leppard
34. Alice in Chains
40. Stone Temple Pilots
41. Ted Nugent
43. Nine Inch Nails
44. ZZ Top
45. Pantera
50. Slayer
51. Thin Lizzy
52. Faith No More
55. Blue Oyster Cult
56. White Zombie
58. Anthrax
62. Ministry
63. Boston
65. The Cult
67. Rolling Stones
69. Megadeth
73. Twisted Sister
91. DanzigNot to mention bands not on the list like dream theater, nevermore, carcass, exodus, testament....etc
Ok you say that slayer sucks, and you like twisted sister. Haha how pathetic you are
Originally posted by Pezmerga
Im not wrong, whatever just drop it cuz i find on forums no one ever admits to being wrong. /shrug so we will both argue forever.
The thing is, you are the wrong one and three or more people have proven you wrong. You're not admitting it because you don't like it.
Originally posted by Pezmerga
Anyway back to actual music Discussion...anyone else find it Atrocious that the Rolling Stones are #67!!!!!!!!!!!!
I mean The New York Dolls and Joan Jett are ahead of them! Stones should be Top 15 at LEAST, on my list anyway.
I agree. I think The Stones should be at least in the top 40.
-AC