Ragnos temple purge

Started by Darth_Glentract52 pages

^agreed

Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
So you're saying in an individual fight, Ragnos is five times as powerful?

I think the real questions that should be asked include:

- Why does all this reasoning by me and Illustrious and others elude you?

- Why does everything have to be numbers with you? Numbers cannot be assigned effectively to anything in life that doesn't sit there and remain constant. There are things called 'variables' that make a world of difference. For instance, you can never throw a frisbee on the same arc every time because of factors with the wind, with your physical imperfections, the frisbee may be distorted from heat, etc.

- Why are you arguing this case in the typically poor sense? I only see you coming around like a ship making another pass and belting out one line of "Well, what about this?", grabbing at straws and looking for loopholes where there are none. And now you're starting on a crusade to establish us fanboys, thinking that's gonna end the argument. Oops, pack your bags, folks... they were just fanboys. Ragnos would be swarmed by the jedi and die. No, Glentract... the point here is the odds are against the jedi, no matter how numerous. Wishing differently won't make it any different, unless you can erase our memories of Ragnos and make certain he was never created. But he exists, and he is formidable, perhaps one of the strongest characters in the series. If he comes knocking at the temple doors, it is a safer bet to say the ones inside will die rather then live.

And really, lesser Sith such as Exar Kun were ultra deadly, as you've said yourself... able ot stall an army with his force powers, and live on for a thousand years as a Force ghost within the massassi ruins... And he's -weaker-. What the hell do you think Ragnos could -possibly- be capable of? He could probably impode a being with a thought if they're not force sensitive. And you saw for yourself how easily a jedi master could be chucked around like a ragdoll (ROTS Dooku versus Obi-Wan and Anakin) by someone twice as old and wise as a jedi master at the end of the Clone Wars. Exar Kun is beyond Dooku or Obi-Wan in Force powers or lightsaber skill, and Ragnos was better even than that.

I don't know how D. Glentract is gonna argue THAT.^

I don't either. I'm rather hoping he just sighs and gives up on this little crusade. I could see if he had really valid points, but for the most part he doesn't. His style of reasoning on this thread is a bit close minded, and is oversimplifying the situation to -find- an excuse for a Sith lord to lose to a Jedi Order of relative warrior babies.

I still stand by the fact that we just don't know enough about Ragnos to make a proper assumption, when versing him off against...anyone really, except Simus. But if you rule the Sth Empire, for God's sake, for 150 years, you got somethin good goin on there.

Detractors would have you believe he was a total pussy who couldn't hold a fight with his dead mum and that he kept the throne because the other Sith were afraid of his wife.

Well if this what she looked like than I wouldn't either.

It's he attempts to assign arbitrary values for every individual. They don't make sense.

You just have to understand that Ludo and Naga feared even his spirit, and Naga was an individual that played around on a cosmic level, clearly Ragnos either has remarkably abilities to make someone fear or listen to him for no apparent reason (unlikely) or he was extremely powerful.

Ragnos is arguably the strongest guy the ever carried a blade in the SW Universe, Nihilus aside. Him with 70 HK and IG droids, designed for effing up jedi make this pretty stacked. And seriously, do you expect EVERY room to be as large as the Moria chamber, and filled with that many Jedi? Not possible.

That was one big city.

Sadow could blow up a star, Nihilus(hate him) could eat the Force, and who knows else could do who knows what.

The problem is that if we want to put people from across thousands of years up against each other, we have to go by what those people could do in THEIR time.

Sadow destroyed a star, and that automatically makes him kickass and invincible compared to almost everyone. And if he was afraid of Ragnos, then what could Marka possibly do?

It's just that, we have no idea how these people from across time would react to each other, or how they would perceive the other. Would Exar be super fast with his saber while facing off against Tulak, or would Hord's legend live up to him? Would the last Jedi Council of the Republic be able to square off Sadow, or would Naga unleash some new, out-of-the-blue technique that would kill them all with ease?

We just don't know how these people would fair against one another if they've never met. Ancient Sith Lord or not.

Okay Ragnos can do it but lets change it. Can Sadow take Ragnos' place?

Hm. That's a bit like making a headshot with a magnum round as opposed to the original canonball, but yeah.

Huh?

Originally posted by atlant80
okay lets say all the jedi in the order are in the temple. yoda mace obi anikan all of them and he cant destroy the building

Maybe you should've thought of that before starting. . .

huh?

ragnos cant beat all these people someone will get a lucky stab on him and they would take him down

Originally posted by DarthMaul9123
ragnos cant beat all these people someone will get a lucky stab on him and they would take him down

So now you're trying to debate "luck"?

Ragnos wins can sadow win is the new change

Don't bother with him Illustrious; he'll never get it.

You're not going to convince me that Ragnos is going to win, but I also see I can't convince anyone he would lose either. This is basically where we shake hands and let this pass.

Naga would lose.

Oh yeah.