Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
That's why I said it was speculation.More recently though, the thread maker said it can be destroyed, so looks like it can.
Oh sorry, well I didn't mean it negative anyway..
But about the battle field, let's just keep it intact, I think?
Because I don't think a jedi can survive so much rubble getting ontop of them as the Jedi temple is probably an enormous stone structure.
Originally posted by overlord
Oh sorry, well I didn't mean it negative anyway..
But about the battle field, let's just keep it intact, I think?
Because I don't think a jedi can survive so much rubble getting ontop of them as the Jedi temple is probably an enormous stone structure.
They can protect themselves from falling debree. It's not like it's all going to collapse at once.
Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
They can protect themselves from falling debree. It's not like it's all going to collapse at once.
I think, eventually everything would come down and if that would happen all jedi would probably die except for some lucky ones and Ragnos would probably survive too.
But if they all fought with each other without the building collapsing I think 10.000 jedi would eventually be too much for the invaders.
That's all I have to say about it.
you lot that are rooting for ragnos and the droids are making too many assumptions as well. You seem to think that there are way more younglings than there actually are. Im guessing that only about 40% were younglings as i do not think any more than half of the jedi or even close to that number consists of younglings. Also the droids will not be a problem at all. 70 hk droids will not do hardly anything and they will all die in about 5 minutes of fghting. It woud only take a medium power force push to kill one. As for ranos bringing the temple down. his power is great but not greater than even half of the jedi combined who will all be ready to revese what ragnos is doing or safely remove any falling debris. And as soon as ragnos tries anyway, there will be at least ten jedi ready to fight him and delay him. And also ragnos will not be able to kill two jedi with one swing from his sword. he is not exactly that good a duelist and as for his sword being heavy that doesnt meen that it is strong, because it isnt even as strong as a lightsaber. So eventually ragnos will be fighting so many jedi with not such a great advantage and would be killed. Ever that or run out of energy. And who the hell called ragnos a force god, he is not invincible, far from it and i dont think he is even the greatest force sensative ever.
Originally posted by birthoftheforce
you lot that are rooting for ragnos and the droids are making too many assumptions as well. You seem to think that there are way more younglings than there actually are. Im guessing that only about 40% were younglings as i do not think any more than half of the jedi or even close to that number consists of younglings. Also the droids will not be a problem at all. 70 hk droids will not do hardly anything and they will all die in about 5 minutes of fghting. It woud only take a medium power force push to kill one. As for ranos bringing the temple down. his power is great but not greater than even half of the jedi combined who will all be ready to revese what ragnos is doing or safely remove any falling debris. And as soon as ragnos tries anyway, there will be at least ten jedi ready to fight him and delay him. And also ragnos will not be able to kill two jedi with one swing from his sword. he is not exactly that good a duelist and as for his sword being heavy that doesnt meen that it is strong, because it isnt even as strong as a lightsaber. So eventually ragnos will be fighting so many jedi with not such a great advantage and would be killed. Ever that or run out of energy. And who the hell called ragnos a force god, he is not invincible, far from it and i dont think he is even the greatest force sensative ever.
HK droids dying from a single push? The Jedi holding the temple up? Ragnos not a good duelist? Sword not as strong as a lightsaber?
You say other people are making assumptions?
You're spouting out more assumptions in this single post than some have for the entire thread. Outside of Atlant, most of the Ragnos supporters are being reasonable.
He's known for his force power and there are better duelists? Hell no. He's mentioned as the most powerful of the most powerful; he's said to possess immense physical strength and a frightening grasp on the force. There's no mention direclty of his fighting ability, but we know he is superior to Naga Sadow, who was under his foot even on his deathbed.
And what proof do you have the lightsabers are stronger than Sith sword sof cortosis and imbued with Sith Magic? In short, prove up.
Originally posted by Illustrious
He's known for his force power and there are better duelists? Hell no. He's mentioned as the most powerful of the most powerful; he's said to possess immense physical strength and a frightening grasp on the force. There's no mention direclty of his fighting ability, but we know he is superior to Naga Sadow, who was under his foot even on his deathbed.And what proof do you have the lightsabers are stronger than Sith sword sof cortosis and imbued with Sith Magic? In short, prove up.
So there is not enough known to make a clear judgement.
As long as jedi/sith can't become godlike beings..
Originally posted by birthoftheforce
What proof do you have that sith swords were stronger. the fact is lightsabers continued to be used and people stopped using swords. It doesnt take much to work out what was better.
Don't try to reverse the question, it doesn't do you any good. It doesn't mean jack.
It wasn't that people used swords and then switched to lightsabers at all.
Swords were used by the Sith, lightsabers have coincided with them, used by the Jedi. It wasn't that everybody used swords, decided they sucked, and then went to lightsabers.
Jedi are peacekeepers, do you think they can conceal a 4 foot long sword? Wouldn't you think it's more practical to carry around a hilt instead?
The Sith declined after Naga Sadow, naturally their artifacts would fall into disuse. Plus, Sith Swords are imbued with SITH MAGIC, why would the Jedi use that?
In fact, Naga Sadow used a sword, found a lightsaber, and preferred the sword over the lightsaber, that should tell you something. If anything, Lightsabers became more prominent because sword WIELDERS became fewer, not because the technology was obsolete. And swords and sabers coexisted, not one supplanted the other. Get the facts straight.