Originally posted by Legend Of Chibi
MACRO-Evolution is not, i repeat, Is NOT the same as MICRO-Evolution, that is why they have different names!http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB902.html
Micro-Evolution does not make you change species, you are always what you are, these apes we come from would have to look amazingly like us to have evolved into us.
Whatever we evolved from wouldn't have become smarter and lost its hair, infact, Apes which live in Jungles etc have fur yet these places are usually quite hot, so why have fur? And why lose it once we left the Jungles?
The point is, Chibi, you have no clue what in the hell you are talking about. Okay? We all know microevolution != macroevolution, but, you are 'teh suck' when it comes to science.
Lamarck's theory was innovative and seemed accurate at the time. But then experiments in genetics showed that, contrary to Lamarck's belief, one does not pass on one's physical traits by use. Seriously, I'm on your side and all, but you have no clue about what you speak.
Have you ever heard the proverb that says, "It is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and confirm it"? You should take its advice and do a little research about Lamarck's theory, Mendel's experiments, Darwin's ideas, and the process of sympatric/allopatric speciation.