Superman and Darkseid VS. Silver Surfer and Thanos

Started by Mindset6 pages
Originally posted by The Great Galen
You know wat esle is slopp writing, SS loses to Thanos. By feats it shoudl easily be SS>>>Thanos but meh, wonky marvel writers.

Not really, by feats Thanos > SS.

Unless you are talking about some non-combat feats.

Originally posted by The Great Galen
You know wat esle is slopp writing, SS loses to Thanos. By feats it shoudl easily be SS>>>Thanos but meh, wonky marvel writers.

you complain about people using the same example against darkseid,yet you use this reason all the time?
how is it wonky writing,thanos has taken everything surfer has to offer and it had know effect.thanso is superior even every department except speed.
give me examples of wonky writing then!!

Here's wonky writing, Thanos can be cut by wolverine and is yet uneffected by Surfer. Thanos staing he is afriad of Hulk yet SS cant beat him WTF

Originally posted by The Great Galen
Here's wonky writing, Thanos can be cut by wolverine and is yet uneffected by Surfer. Thanos staing he is afriad of Hulk yet SS cant beat him WTF

That would be writing that contradicts with Thanos average showings.

And he never said he was afraid of Hulk.

if i remember correctly wolverine cut surfer before, so what it means nothing.abc logic!!
thanos said it was a conflict he sought to aviod, not that he feared hulk,anyway thaos has put hulk inline before.

Originally posted by The Great Galen
SS >>> Thanos

😐

Thanos solos this f*cking thread.

A lot of fans agree that SS should be ranked above Thanos, it only makes sense based on there feats and such. I mean Drax killed Thanos and Drax isnt exactly SS...regardless DS solos this.

Originally posted by The Great Galen
A lot of fans agree that SS should be ranked above Thanos, it only makes sense based on there feats and such. I mean Drax killed Thanos and Drax isnt exactly SS...regardless DS solos this.

Drax was made for the sole purpose of killing Thanos.

And a lot of fans are wrong.

Originally posted by The Great Galen
A lot of fans agree that SS should be ranked above Thanos, it only makes sense based on there feats and such. I mean Drax killed Thanos and Drax isnt exactly SS...regardless DS solos this.

seriously im not trying to be an ass, how does ds solo?

Thanos

Originally posted by quanchi112
This book is canon to dc. Its a good read to boot. Great art and great stories. It backs itself up. 🙂

🤨 No it doesn't. There isn't a single thing in that book that gets referenced elsewhere.

Once again, PROVE IT! Prove it, you worthless hypocritical biased excuse for a debator.

Btw, snatching guys like Orion from the timestream and controlling them isn't a feat? Soloing and controling the LSH, isn't a feat? Standing up to their full firepower before he boosted his power via pantheon killing ISN'T A FEAT?!

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
🤨 No it doesn't. There isn't a single thing in that book that gets referenced elsewhere.

Once again, PROVE IT! Prove it, you worthless hypocritical biased excuse for a debator.

Btw, snatching guys like Orion from the timestream and controlling them isn't a feat? Soloing and controling the LSH, isn't a feat? Standing up to their full firepower before he boosted his power via pantheon killing ISN'T A FEAT?!

No 😎

Stay out of this. And how is that an answer? If you can't prove that S/B is canon, (and most evidence including the bizarre lapses of continuity and shit writing indicates it's not), then it can't be used to bash DS.

Cry more 🤺

Originally posted by quanchi112
This book is canon to dc. Its a good read to boot. Great art and great stories. It backs itself up. 🙂
Wow no proof provided.

Nice.

The way I see it, it comes down to this:
Which hero will be less distracted by his "partner"?
I say that the surfer has the edge here. With his cosmic awareness, he can watch his own back a little better that Supes can ('cause neither Thanos or Darkseid can be trusted, obviously). Being less distracted, SS can fight more efectively- and I think he's MARGINALLY more powerful than Superman (at the very least, he has superior distance attacks).
the winners: Silver Surfer and Thanos
P.S. The Surfer is killed immediately afterwards by Thanos.

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
🤨 No it doesn't. There isn't a single thing in that book that gets referenced elsewhere.

Once again, PROVE IT! Prove it, you worthless hypocritical biased excuse for a debator.

Btw, snatching guys like Orion from the timestream and controlling them isn't a feat? Soloing and controling the LSH, isn't a feat? Standing up to their full firepower before he boosted his power via pantheon killing ISN'T A FEAT?!

Even you say that the Superman/Batman arc is canon so why do I have to prove anything to you. And you call me biased when you yourself admit you are dc biased.

Darkseid's henchmen snatched Orion from the timestream. Ds was still out. If you read it youd know this.

Darkseid stood up to them because he was stealing his means powers but ultimately got crushed by puberty Superman. It was a bad,bad showing for Darkseid.

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
Stay out of this. And how is that an answer? If you can't prove that S/B is canon, (and most evidence including the bizarre lapses of continuity and shit writing indicates it's not), then it can't be used to bash DS.
Your yourself admit its canon.

Superman/Batman is canon.

Using only low showings for one character and only high showing for another character isn't good debating.

The thread starter only said the fight takes place on Earth, not DC or Marvel Earth. In a neutral universe Surfer can't use Kryptonite on Superman because it's a different universe and it won't effect him and that's assuming Surfer could make Kryptonite. Red sun radiation isn't a well known weakness and not public knowledge. Also, red sun radiation is considered power draining which the thread starter said wasn't allowed.

Quan and Trick, I suggest you both put each other on ignore for your own good.

Closed for now.....