Poll
10%
24%
57%
10%
yoda is a lot stronger than maul and only slightly stronger than vader(though that is not definitely true as people asume vader is terrible because he was nothin special in the original trilogy and the technology and funding was not good enough to make vader amazing, but through literature and games such as episode 3 we can assume that the battle suit permanently made vader slow.) But from evidence that is most likely to be correct lets say vader is just a bit stronger than maul. i think yoda will lose as he isn't exactly that great against multiple oponents. sure he can defend well against them but not attack. i think it will be close but vader's power plus maul's technique would triumph over yoda
Yoda would kill them both, not with to with to much effort either. Yoda is very good at multiple opponents. Three jedi council masters fought him at the same time an no one was close to hit him. He could take Maul out simply by using the force and he could kill Vader in a sword fight. There was a thread like this but these two against Mace and Mace had a clear victory, and he was second to Yoda.
Originally posted by kamikz
Yoda would kill them both, not with to with to much effort either. Yoda is very good at multiple opponents. Three jedi council masters fought him at the same time an no one was close to hit him. He could take Maul out simply by using the force and he could kill Vader in a sword fight. There was a thread like this but these two against Mace and Mace had a clear victory, and he was second to Yoda.
Actually Ataru isn't very good against multiple opponentes reason why; Atartu employs acrobatics. While flipping, jumping, or running an Ataru practitioner could get side-swiped or blind-sided. . .but Yoda has been training for 900 years I'm sure he's mastered forms of lightsaber combat other than Ataru. . .but anyways Yoda owns these chumps. . .