The Official KMC "Conspiracy" Thread

Originally posted by Mr Parker
Yeah thats what people like him and Kharma dog do when they cant counter your points,they go on an insulting rampage. 🙄

Can't counter points? I counter them quite well infact. I insult you because you are a silly little child who does not listen to logic or common sense.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
according to most independent investigaters who are experts in the field -never.

Most? Wrong again. Ush explained the phenomenon quite well. Do you have comprehension problems as well?

Originally posted by Mr Parker
As I mentioned earlier,in martial law they showed a building in a country that burned for days that was built with metal,yet the fire never caused that building to crumble. 🙄

But did this building also recieve an impact from a plane going 600 mph and experience the structural stress of a building as large as either of those towers?

Originally posted by Mr Parker
Another really interesting tidbit I learned recently.My friend told me about it.

PLease keep your friends' knowledge out of this debate. It is irrelavent unless you investigate it yourself and I am sure that your friends are as ignorant as you are. Birds of a feather......

Originally posted by Mr Parker
Now that he mentioend that to me,I now remember seeing it in the video Martial law is that world trade center 7 which was NOT hit by any of the debris- as it shows in the tape ALSO came toppling down.Which is really weird that it as well came toppling down since it never was hit by any debris.

The structural damage that it would have suffered from the collapse of the two towers would have been enough.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
Thats really weird that the owner of that building tells a firefighter to take it down when its not much of a serious fire..

Until you have proof of that it should be regarded as total B.S.

I can't believe any of your sources as you seem to believe Deano's even when they are proven false.

you crack me up,you continue to show why you cant be taken serious with your memory comprehenison problems you have.I took a peak on your last post to see if you were still responding to my posts when i have made it perfectly clear a dozen times or so I no longer read your insane ramblings anymore-well not your ENTIRE posts anyways.I read the first 3 words of yours-cant counter points.You love to show off your memory problems you have by talking to yourself. 😆 how pitiful. 😆

Originally posted by Mr Parker
you crack me up,you continue to show why you cant be taken serious with your memory comprehenison problems you have.I took a peak on your last post to see if you were still responding to my posts when i have made it perfectly clear a dozen times or so I no longer read your insane ramblings anymore-well not your ENTIRE posts anyways.I read the first 3 words of yours-cant counter points.You love to show off your memory problems you have by talking to yourself. 😆 how pitiful. 😆

I read them,Deano I think reads them and Ush reads them...it's not our fault you don't take debating seriously enough to read some constructive criticism...infact, there is no point being here atall!

silverstein said on tv that they should pull the building.

- but there was no damage to the buildings silverstein........

- yeh but i want the money from the buildings...

- ok😐

Originally posted by Deano
silverstein said on tv that they should pull the building.

- but there was no damage to the buildings silverstein........

- yeh but i want the money from the buildings...

- ok😐

😂 Well, he is clearly Jewish, what do you expect?

Originally posted by Mr Parker
you crack me up,you continue to show why you cant be taken serious with your memory comprehenison problems you have.I took a peak on your last post to see if you were still responding to my posts when i have made it perfectly clear a dozen times or so I no longer read your insane ramblings anymore-well not your ENTIRE posts anyways.I read the first 3 words of yours-cant counter points.You love to show off your memory problems you have by talking to yourself. 😆 how pitiful. 😆

Don't try and kid the people on this board or yourself. You read my posts. Not only that, it irks you that I make you often look the fool that you are.

You took a peak to see if I was responding to your posts? I dind't say that I was ignoring you. Do you see how you look foolish again.

I also see that you are trying to avoid my arguments by pretending to avoid me, that way it's easier and you don't have to think in order to counter my points. I have two twin 3 year old neices who approach a difference of opinon with more maturiry than you.

Keep your head in the sand, I'm sure you feel safe and warm.

Originally posted by Deano
silverstein said on tv that they should pull the building.

- but there was no damage to the buildings silverstein........

- yeh but i want the money from the buildings...

- ok😐

I'm lost here, what are you talking about?

larry silverstein said

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cutter.html

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
I read them,Deano I think reads them and Ush reads them...it's not our fault you don't take debating seriously enough to read some constructive criticism...infact, there is no point being here atall!

Originally posted by Mr Parker
of course you read them,why wouldnt you? the majority of stuff he says,you agree with.I know Deano reads them,I dont why.Like me,he insults him if he doesnt agree with him.I guess Deano has a much higher tolerence level to put up with KD's childish insults than I do.I get tired of it after a while.thats just it,he NEVER has any constructive critisem despite what you may think.See I read YOUR stuff because YOU havent at least insulted me yet.You insulted someone else earlier so I wonder how much longer that will last.But you havent insulted ME yet like KD constantly does with me and deano so until the time comes when you go on a continual insulting rampage like KD does all the time when valid points are brought up that he ignores and dismisses,well then I'll continue to read your posts.

I try to take this alot more lightharted than KD and Ush, in the spirit of humouring you guys! I think what you say has merit occasionally, but I think you are wrong...

Originally posted by Deano
larry silverstein said

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cutter.html

Yep thats what i was talking about earlier.Thanks for posting that Deano.wonder how much longer it will be before Kharma Dog comes on and says-thats no credible evidence,only a moron would believe any of that,blah blah blah blah blah. 🙄

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."

Hardly a conspiracy...

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
I try to take this alot more lightharted than KD and Ush, in the spirit of humouring you guys! I think what you say has merit occasionally, but I think you are wrong...

too bad you cant teach them to be more lighthearted about it all and not take it all so serious when we dont agree with them.also thats why I have chosen to talk with you about it unlike DOG because you at least have some things that I think have merit as well like the point about the metal being out of the builiding.

Well, I respect KD as a poster and in my opinion, he is very rarely wrong when it comes to talking to Deano about this or that, but, if someone is going to post a link then predict another posters actions in a negative light, it is obviously going to rile up that poster!

Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
No, Lucifer is a latin word which means "Light Bringer" or "Morning Star", jesus is called lucifer in revalations. when it was first used in the book of Isaiah, it was towards the babylonian king and babylons "Sun worship". And where in the bible does it mention lucifer being in charge of music?

Tell you what....

I'll do a search here in a little bit as to where the word Lucifer is found in the Bible. That includes the Old Testament and the New of course.

Perhaps I'll go even further than that. I'll check other sources as well.

Lucifer is the Angel of Darkness my friends. Not the Angel of Light. I don't know where you are getting your information from...but it is false.

You want to research the "good" Angels then I suggest looking into Gabriel, Michael, Uriel, and the like.

Those who have done battle with Satan/Lucifer in various ways.

Originally posted by NuclearWinter
Tell you what....

I'll do a search here in a little bit as to where the word Lucifer is found in the Bible. That includes the Old Testament and the New of course.

Perhaps I'll go even further than that. I'll check other sources as well.

Lucifer is the Angel of Darkness my friends. Not the Angel of Light. I don't know where you are getting your information from...but it is false.

I am inclined to agree, I always believed Lucifer to be the fallen angel...to be later known as the Devi, but I am unsure....inform us of your results please!

Absolutely. =)

I think I will check Wikipedia,

Lucifer was originally a Latin word meaning "light-bearer" (from lux, "light", and ferre, "to bear, bring"😉, a Roman astrological term for the "Morning Star", the planet Venus. The word Lucifer was the direct translation of the Greek eosphorus ("dawn-bearer"; cf. Greek phosphorus, "light-bearer"😉 used by Jerome in the Vulgate. In that passage, Isaiah 14:12, it referred to one of the popular honorific titles of a Babylonian king; however, later interpretations of the text, and the influence of embelishments in works such as Dante's The Divine Comedy and Milton's Paradise Lost, led to the common idea in Christian mythology and folklore that Lucifer was a poetic appellation of Satan.

n modern and late Medieval Christian thought, Lucifer is a fallen angel commonly associated with Satan, the embodiment of evil and enemy of God. Lucifer (who was supposed to be very beautiful) is generally considered, based on the influence of Christian literature and legend, to have been a prominent archangel in heaven(allthough some contexts say he was a cherub or a seraph), prior to having been motivated by pride to rebel against God. When the rebellion failed, Lucifer was cast out of heaven, along with a third of the heavenly host, and came to reside in the Hell. However, this common belief is not officially accepted by most Christian denominations, on the grounds that it exalts evil to an overly high position and is not directly supported by any passage in the Bible.

Hmmm I guess I pulled a Deano...But I put it in quote bubbles so thats Ok.