Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Hardly a conspiracy...
okay then what DO you call it then since that building wasnt hit by any debris? and why would he ask them to pull it if there was no damage to it? 🙄 and why did it catch on fire if it never was hit by any debris? could it be because it was arson? 😱
its funny that since that building was detonated that it collapsed downwards just like the two towers did.I will take the word of firemen who I have seen with my own eyes and heard with my own ears say they have put out fires before where the fire was the result of bombs that went off in the buildings,and because of that,they know what bombs sound like.I will take their word any day of the year over some internet posters who try to come and say otherwise.
Originally posted by Mr Parker
okay then what DO you call it then since that building wasnt hit by any debris? and why would he ask them to pull it if there was no damage to it? 🙄 and why did it catch on fire if it never was hit by any debris? could it because it was arson? 😱
Let's not forget the fact that WTC 7 somehow fell in the excat same fashion I.E pancake collapse, as the other 2 buildings.
http://www.forumgarden.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12849&page=51
http://rinf.*********37.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=activsm&thread=1139510752&page=15
http://www.prophecynet.com/showthread.php?t=13544
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=61201
http://www.pro-american.com/forums/showthread.php?t=10341
Seems your posting all over the net, nuclearwinter. you really doing a good job.
Originally posted by Mr Parker
okay then what DO you call it then since that building wasnt hit by any debris? and why would he ask them to pull it if there was no damage to it? 🙄 and why did it catch on fire if it never was hit by any debris? could it be because it was arson? 😱
Maybe, just maybe....he pulled it down because he wanted the money forr it?
Whether people like Kd and Ush ect want to believe it or not,Alex Jones has done an amazing job of research on this,better than the government has.The thing I like about him is that not only does he back up his claims with all these links to papers around the world and goes out and interviews knowledgeable people that are experts in the field.But he also tells people to not take his word for it,to go to his site and check out the stuff yourself.anybody who has logic and common sense that checks out this stuff,would know that he has hit the nail right on the head in all his claims. these foreign newspapers are not afraid to print the truth in their country's.such as this one,the times of India,their paper goes into detail how Bush took agents off the Bin laden trail.Jones has met these agents that have told him this as well.The Times of India paper starts off their heading saying-America was itself to blame for the events of 9-11.Then there is the link that says Bush warned of hijacks by British intelligence.Bush ignored warnings from french. The British newspaper and the french newspapers also go on to talk about warnings they gave to Bush that he ignored.
But whats really important here since people here cant seem to get it that there is no way that the fire would have caused the buildings to collapse is all you got to do is go to infowars.com and click on the left hand corner where it says-9-11,then it takes you to a screen and you will THEN see on the left hand corner again,9-11 an inside job,part two.9-11 blueprint.click that on and you will see these links pop up.Click on the link down in the middle there that says OTHER SKYSCRAPER FIRES and you will see the headline pop up that says-FIRES HAVE NEVER CAUSED SKYSCRAPERS TO COLLAPSE. In that article,they go on to talk about how there have been fires in skyscrapers in the past around the country that were far more severe than the ones in the world trade center and just like I mentioned earlier,like that building that burned in spain I think for days,they burned for several hours and did not collapse.and you can say that because unlike those fires,this one collapsed because of a jet liner because as Emperor pointed out earlier,Jet fuel doesnt cause metal to burn. Knowing how the government lies all the time and how their explanations dont add up,again I will take the word over firefighters that I saw with my own eyes and heard with my own ears in the video MARTIAL LAW saying they heard bombs go off and they have put out fires with bombs going off before so they know what they sound like,I will take THEIR word over what some internet poster like KD comes on and has to say anyday of the year.
Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Maybe, just maybe....he pulled it down because he wanted the money forr it?
well according to your logic then,then the world trade centers were designed to go down as well by our own government.which is what we have been saying.Isnt it just a little too convient as well that it happened on the same day and it went down the same way WT 1 & 2 did?
Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Thats brilliant, don't take my word for it...just use the heavily biasd in my favour stuff on MY website...way for me to make money!
if there wasnt anything to what he said,people wouldnt go there and buy his stuff. 🙄 He also doesnt exactly sound like someone who is interested in mostly profits.He brings experts into the field around the country to go to his seminars he has.He talks about writing to your congressmen demanding for an independent investigation.That hardly sounds like someone who is doing this mostly for profit. 🙄