All of the beliefs you currently hold dear have been influenced
by people who do not have your best interests at heart.
- They want mega-profits for themselves.
- They want to enslave us.
- They want us to be unhealthy and fat so that we die at an early
age.
- They do not want us to think for ourselves.
- They want us to spend hours in front of their propaganda
machines: TV.
- They want us to be limited in our religious beliefs.
- They want us to remain poor.
- They want us to become miserable failures in the universal
scheme of things.
And their dastardly plan is working.4
That explains the state of the world currently. And it will become
worse, far worse.
Ultimate Health & Longevity
Here is a little secret about how the medical establishment operates:
- If nature made the cure, you cannot patent it...
- If you cannot patent it, you cannot mark it up for megaprofits...
- And that means you cannot pay for TV commercials, you
cannot deluge doctors with samples, you cannot endow
universities to bless it with their research, and you cannot
afford the legal shenanigans to push it through the FDA.
Almost 93% of non-surgical ailments can be cured effectively by
controlling what you put in your mouth from nature. Controlling your
food and drink, and enhancing your intake with herbs and supplements.
Nature is the best healer you will ever find, but any
breakthroughs as a result of research into natural healing are squashed,
before they can affect the profits of all-powerful drug companies.
Drug companies, in their greedy drive for higher profits, have
focused on producing drugs which only address the symptoms, often at
the expense of worsening the original condition they claim to have been
trying to cure. This obviously creates a further profit potential, to sell
further drugs to alleviate the additional symptoms. They have violated
the Immutable Laws of Nature, imposing their own laws, and in the
process have created even more unhappiness and ongoing health
problems.
Well, we would all love to live in a world where everything was held together by people being nice to each other. As if.
But even among altruistic lines, you simply don't get the focus of research into products you get when there is a stonking finanical reward. Nor the resources being stumped up in the first place.
from the book 'fresh wisdom'
Personal Freedom & Independence
If you asked any individual living in any Western Democratic Country: “Are you free?” they would almost unhesitatingly reply “Yes, I am free.” A few more thoughtful souls might qualify their answer by saying something like: “Yes, I am reasonably free,” or “Well, I am as free as anyone else.” Most would say that they enjoy a tremendous amount of personal liberty in their private and public lives. Well, they are all completely wrong. The vast majority of people are about as trapped or ‘un-free’ as it is possible to get without being manacled to the wall of some dank cell. They have almost no freedom in any area of their lives. They have allowed themselves to be absolutely and rigorously controlled by outside forces - other people - to the extent that they can barely shuffle around and make grunting noises through their gags. Only those who have correctly understood and applied the principles of Personal Freedom & Independence can be said to be truly free. The rest are, to a greater or lesser extent, slaves.
Consider this:
The ‘normal’ person works for a living in a job which they either actively dislike, or just tolerate. A few ‘lucky’ souls occasionally enjoy some aspects of their job - on a good day. The ‘normal’ person has to get to work at a certain time every single day of the working week. They dare not be late or leave before a certain time, under threat
of some form of penalty.
Thus, approximately forty hours of every single week - week in, week out - are governed and ruled by the dictates of someone else.
No matter how liberal the company, no matter how nice the boss, no matter how much flexi-time is offered, the stark truth is that for about
forty hours every week, the ‘normal’ person hands over complete control of their life to other people, who make them sing and dance more or less like a puppet.
Here is something else:
The ‘normal’ person willingly hands over at least fifty percent of their personal wealth, in the form of taxes, to other people to spend as they see fit. They neither ask for, nor expect accountability. They do not know where their money is spent (except in the vaguest way), and they do not care. They do not ask for facts and figures, or expect accountability, honesty or efficiency. If they try to withhold their money, then agents of force come and take them away and throw them in jail. They accept this as reasonable and normal.
They are taught nothing whatsoever in school about how their own government handles the country’s finances. If they were to ask the government for an itemized bill of where their money (taxes) had been spent, they would be met with blank stares and vague answers. But we
are not finished yet!
The ‘normal’ person reads newspapers, watches television news and current affairs, listens to radio news broadcasts and actually believes many of the items they hear. More importantly, they spend a significant amount of their time debating these issues with friends, and pontificating about the rights and wrongs of the particular issue in question. In this manner, their emotions are controlled by whatever news story the media decide they will release to them that day. They hold a huge collection of opinions and views about every conceivable topic from nuclear power to
abortion, and spend a significant amount of their time explaining and
defending these views.
This, despite the fact that they often have almost no knowledge at all about these topics, and are merely repeating ‘information bites’released by the media. They watch televised debates about a certain topical issue, and actually take one side or another – even to the extent of becoming hot under the collar when the opposition view is being expressed. In this
way, their opinions and views are safely polarized into one camp or another, and firmly away from any real choices, decisions or debates.
So it is clear that no-one living in any Western democracy is in
fact free. We are all bound by extremely limiting beliefs and lifestyles.
ahh yes, fight urban myth with urban myth
http://www.snopes.com/critters/lurkers/gator.htm
ICKE NEWSLETTER
MIRROR, MIRROR ON THE WALL...
...WHO IS THE MOST CORRUPT OF ALL ...?
Hello ...
There's an old saying that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. There is truth in this, of course, but my father was even more correct when he used to say that the real problem was that 'power attracts the corruptible'.
I mean, why do people want this 'power' in the first place?
Another of my dad's sayings was that anyone who desired political power should be banned from running for office. Not the most democratic view, you might say, but I can see where he was coming from.
If there is a role for the politician it is to hand power back to people to regain control over their own lives, not to horde it for themselves and the elite they have to serve to maintain their 'power'.
Yes, there are some people who enter politics with the best of intentions, but the system soon gobbles them up, turns their heads or binds them in a web of bureaucracy to make them impotent.
World leaders...their other faces are looking right...
Those who reach the top of the greasy pole only make it through corruption, being a moral vacuum, serving the king-makers, and the ruthless, truthless, pursuit of 'power'.
So if you ask me is a president, prime minister or chancellor 'corrupt', my reply would be 'Are they a president, prime minister or chancellor? Yes? Then they are corrupt. They couldn't reach that level of political office without being so.
This brings us to a sobering fact. By the very nature of the system and the way it is structured, the world is ruled by the ruthless and deeply corrupt, those who want power for power's sake, and those who are answerable at all times to the elite who fund and support them so long as they enjoy slavish compliance in return.
So are some governments corrupt? No, ALL governments are corrupt because that's the way the system is set up.
You see the same at every level of government, too. On the Isle of Wight, a small island off the English south coast where I live, the local government is notoriously corrupt and controlled by the Freemasonic lodges.
The current British and American governments are so comprehensively corrupt they have almost given up trying to hide the fact. There are so many holes in their dyke they have long run out of fingers.
Mr. Dark Eyes
The latest from the genetic liar and cheat, known to the world as Tony Blair, is to give seats in Britain's House of Lords, the second chamber of Parliament, to rich businessmen who donate to his 'New' (Neo)-Labour Party. So far, secret 'loans' to Blair of some 14 million Pounds have been exposed and, stands back in amazement, many of the donors were subsequently nominated for 'peerages' - the title 'Lord' and the right to speak and vote in Parliament.
The money was given as 'loans' (no-need-to-pay-them-back-type 'loans'😉 because of a hole in the law that allows 'loans' to political parties to be kept private while straight donations have to be publicly declared. So with donations the connection between the donor and the peerage can be seen in the public record, but with a 'loan' the loaner is secret and the connection concealed.
Or, at least that's the theory of the corrupt and contemptible behind this scam. Fortunately, on this occasion, their cover was blown and what a cesspit it has revealed.
I have been writing for years about the way governments are actually controlled by a tiny clique answerable to the power brokers in the shadows that the public never see. Cabinet ministers who sat around the same table as Blair every week, and were collectively known as 'the government', have told after their sacking or resignation that 'the government' was actually Blair and his unelected 'advisors'. Elected ministers were virtually irrelevant, except as gofers to do the will of the clique and justify its decisions to the public.
This money-for-peerages scandal has confirmed what intelligent people already knew about the Labour 'Party'. It, too, is only a vehicle for Blair and his controllers to use and abuse as they will - just as the Republican 'Party' is the fiefdom of the Bush cartel. The Labour treasurer has said publicly that he knew nothing about the loans, nor did the party chairman, and nor even did Blair's buffoon of a deputy prime minister, John Prescott.
So who did? Only Blair and his clique.
And how was the money spent? To get Blair re-elected to continue to serve the Illuminati agenda for an Orwellian Britain and, in collusion with the rat pack behind Bush, an Orwellian global state.
In America, the president is bought and sold even before he comes to office. The two main parties raised a record $1.7 billion for the 2004 campaign and that money comes at a price in agreed policies and personnel.
Abraham Lincoln said in his Gettysburg Address that '... government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.' But Abe, mate, it HAS. And it was gone by the time you said it. What's more, it's becoming ever more blatant.
Even John Dean, Richard Nixon's legal counsel who was jailed for his part in the Watergate scandal, says the present U.S. government is potentially the most corrupt, unethical and undemocratic White House in history:
'Bush and Cheney are a throwback to the Nixon time. All government business is filtered through a political process at this White House, which is the most secretive ever to run the United States. This is not in the public's interest. It's in the White House's interest ... The White House is being run like a private business, with the difference that it is not accountable to the shareholders - in this case the voters.'
All true, except that he forgets the staggering corruption of the Reagan-Bush and Clinton administrations alone, and misses the key point that the 'shareholders' of the government have never been the voters. Governments are indeed private businesses and the shareholders are the elite few who bankroll the political puppets and reap the fantastic rewards - 'dividends' - in government contracts, policies that suit their corporations, and a say in who is appointed to head the key departments, including the military.
Hitler and Mussolini
The Italian dictator, Benito Mussolini, said that 'Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power'. Under that definition, most of the world has been under fascism for centuries. This is what the so-called 'democratic system' of government really is - the 'merger of state and corporate power'.
The voters merely go through the farce of 'choosing' which bunch of corrupt politicians will do the deals with the same corporate forces that would have done the deals with the other 'side' had they won.
But most of the people don't realise they live in a fascist state because they are allowed to 'vote' for the government every few years. We should not confuse the right to vote with the right to choose. They are not the same thing - even less so now with electronic voting machines with no paper trail being introduced in the United States.
The British people did not choose to re-elect Blair in 2005. Only 36% of the voters supported him and yet he secured total power. Well, power to carry out the will of the corporate/secret society elite, anyway. And when he is replaced by another Labour prime minister or the Conservative Party's Blair mark II, David Cameron, they will be in bed with the same corporate forces that control Blair. They might be different individuals, but they represent the same controlling force.
Does anyone think that the next American president, be it Hillary Clinton or whoever, will be any less corrupt and in league with the cartel? Of course not
It is not a case of 'Is a government fascist?' Under Mussolini's definition - and he should know - virtually all the world's governments are fascist. The only real difference between them is the degree to which the population is controlled and how blatant it is. The real question is not 'are you fascist?', but rather 'how deep is your fascism?'. The more blatant it is, the deeper it is, because it is so certain of its control that it can openly flaunt it.
Clearly, we are, at the very least, approaching that stage today.
Then the question comes, why is it allowed to happen? How much more are the people and the voting-fodder politicians going to take before these breathtakingly corrupt people are removed from office?
Bush and Blair went to war on a lie and so far it has cost the lives of thousands of troops and, at a now conservative estimate, more than 100,000 Iraqi civilians. They have been shown in even government documents to have knowingly lied to the people to justify the war and to have agreed the time of the invasion up to a year before the bombs began to cascade. Right up to that moment, despite the long-term agreement, they were still saying 'We are doing everything possible to avoid a conflict'.
It is clear from the evidence that both 'elections' which put Bush in the White House were manipulated by vote-rigging; Blair raised millions for his last election campaign by arranging secret loans followed by some of the donors being nominated for a peerage.
And these are the same people who are changing the laws virtually by the day to remove the most basic of freedoms and impose the will of the State on even the fine detail of our lives.
So why do they have the power to do this in what are supposed to be 'free countries'? Simple, the desire for power of the political underlings.
While there still needs to be - just - a vote in Parliament or Congress for some of these fundamental changes, there is still the opportunity for the politicians not in high office in the governing party to make themselves heard and vote against the extreme policies of the White House or Downing Street. But most of them don't because of three main reasons. They are either:
(1) Too stupid to realise the implications of what they are voting for; (2) Frightened of upsetting the party hierarchy and so damaging their own chances of high office in the future; (3) Determined not to undermine their governing party to the extent that their own seats in Parliament or Congress might be at risk at the next election. The latter is known in politics as 'showing a united front'. No, no. It's selling your soul for power and prestige.
In other words, their desire for power and office is more important to them than serving the best interests of the people they are supposed to represent. So, out of perceived self-interest, they vote new laws into being that have been decided by a tiny few answerable to the elite dictating from the shadows.
This was the mentality that my father was talking about when he said that anyone who desired political power should be banned from running for office. Power for power's sake does not a free society make.
In America, there is the added incentive to the Fodder on the Hill to support what the White House-Pentagon cabal want to foist on the people. The lower ranks have their own corporate donors to keep sweet. If they don't vote the way their sponsors want then the cash cow departs the dairy. And, of course, any skeletons lying around in their lives make politicians open to 'vote this way or we'll make a few calls'
The other potential opposition, the mainstream media, is owned by the same corporate forces that own the governments, and so lap-dog journalism - 'Here boy, woof, woof, lick, lick' - ensures that the really significant truths never come out through these sad and pathetic people.
I guess that just leaves the rest of us, then. On past evidence, I am not sure that is a comforting thought, although it could be if we got off our backsides and, even more importantly, got off our knees.
The billions are controlled by the ridiculously few because we fall for divide and rule, self-interest, lack of interest, and the belief that we have no power so there's nothing we can do.
Six billion people on the planet, a relative handful of people knowingly seeking total power? I think I see a way out of this.
It is hardly encouraging that, given what is happening in the world, given the lies, the control and the slaughter, there is still no mass revolution; still no mass campaign of non-cooperation with the forces of state control and global murder until these criminals and killers are gone and freedom is restored; still no mass sit-ins at government buildings and centres to stop the criminals operating.
Why? Because we fall for divide and rule, self-interest, lack of interest, and the belief that we have no power so there's nothing we can do.
But that doesn't mean a peoples' revolution can't happen if we choose at last to unite on what we agree on, instead of being divided by what we see differently. In the end, if this world is not to be a global Orwellian state within a few years, it must happen and once it starts it will explode. The longer we wait the more they will have protected themselves from just such a mass response, but when we decide to act together, as one, there is nothing that can stop us because it is we who hold the system together while the elite just gorge on it.
When we stop cooperating with the system there is no system.
So what is this revolution I am talking about? One of guns and violence? No, no, of course not. That's not a revolution of the status quo, but a mirror of it.
It is a revolution that happens within us and then manifests 'without' in action. It is restoring our inner power, the understanding that we are the world and the world is us. It can be summed up in one sentence:
Doing what we know to be right.
Not, that is, what we think is necessarily right for ourselves and our self interest in the moment. Just ...
Doing what we know to be right.
No fascist state can survive that mentality on a mass scale. Neither can injustice, famine, poverty, control, imposition of belief and all the other expressions and consequences of misguided self-interest.
Doing what we know to be right.
That is the revolution and come it must.
Non-violence is the answer to the crucial political and moral questions of our time; the need for mankind to overcome oppression and violence without resorting to oppression and violence. Mankind must evolve for all human conflict a method which rejects revenge, aggression, and retaliation. The foundation of such a method is love.'
Martin Luther King Jr., December 11, 1964
'An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody will see it.' - Mahatma Gandhi