PAID TO POISON ...
... DOCTORS ON THE TAKE ...
Hello all,
I have been highlighting for 20 years how the medical establishment in Britain, America and around the world is just an arm of government and the pharmaceutical cartel, or 'Big Pharma'. The last thing it represents is human health.
This week came the latest grotesque example with the case of Dr. Andrew Wakefield, the man who first suggested a link between the combined measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, or 'MMR', and both autism and bowel problems. He caused an international medical storm in 1998 when and he and eleven other doctors produced a research study which reported bowel symptoms in 12 autistic children and claimed a possible link with MMR.
Dr. Andrew Wakefield
What followed was a tidal wave of condemnation to discredit his claims by discrediting him - the age-old method used by the establishment against information it wants to suppress. It has been used on me many times. Wakefield had been hired by lawyers to investigate the link with autism with a view to parents suing the drug companies involved and he did not mention this in the published paper. This was jumped upon to discredit the research and ten of the other 11 authors of the report withdrew their support.
But the question remained and remains: are the findings true? This is of little importance to the establishment who behave like a hanging posse or inquisition when anyone challenges its dogma and those who fund its gravy train - the drug companies.
GlaxoSmithKline, one of the companies involved with MMR, along with others like Aventis Pasteur and Merck.
Wakefield, a Canadian trained gastroenterologist, left the Royal Free Hospital in London 'by mutual consent' in the aftermath of his report and has since worked mostly in the United States, continuing his research at Thoughtful House, a centre for autistic children in Texas.
But the establishment is always motivated by revenge for those who dare to challenge its agenda. It may have to wait some time to strike, but it never forgives or forgets. So now the General Medical Council (GMC) in Britain is charging Dr. Wakefield with professional misconduct with a view to striking him off and destroying his medical career and livelihood. He is accused of 'inadequately founded research, failing to obtain ethical committee approval, obtaining funding "improperly" and subjecting children to 'unnecessary and invasive investigations'.
Given the extraordinary numbers of people killed or permanently damaged by doctors and drug company products every year, the charge of 'inadequately founded research' would be hilarious if it were not so serious for Dr. Wakefield and medical freedom. It is the same with 'unnecessary investigations', given the number of unnecessary drugs and 'tests' that doctors prescribe.
Autism in children ... Andrew Wakefield is trying to establish the cause ...
An editorial in Britain's Daily Mail newspaper, headed 'MMR and a doctor only doing his duty', encapsulated the real reason for the attempt to destroy Andrew Wakefield. It pointed out that no-one has complained to the General Medical Council about him and nor has anybody suggested that he said or wrote anything dishonest when he believed he had discovered a link between the MMR vaccine and autism. Why, it asked, was the GMC now throwing the book at him? The editorial went on:
'The case has the whiff about it of a medieval inquisition, called to defend the orthodoxy of the establishment against the heresy of an independent mind. Dr Wakefield's "crime" was to open an important debate that remains unresolved. Eight years on, he is by no means alone among doctors in believing that he may have been on to something. The trouble is we just don't know.
Even Tony Blair, though publicly committed to the triple vaccine, seems to have private doubts. What else would explain why he has refused to tell MPs if his son Leo has been given it? After all, he has never been above dragging his family into the spotlight, when it suits his political purposes ...
... Think what an uproar there would be today if it was discovered that Dr Wakefield had kept his suspicions to himself and a link had subsequently been proven. He had a duty to speak out - and now he is being made to suffer for it.
His treatment by the GMC is utterly unjust. If this preposterous body had existed 200 years ago, defending the prevailing wisdom against new ideas, doctors would still be treating illnesses by slitting their patients' veins.'
Galileo faces the inquisition for telling the truth in 1633 and the inquisition never ended - ask Andrew Wakefield
The primary motivation for targeting Wakefield is that his findings led to a significant fall in the number of parents allowing their children to have the combined MMR vaccine and undermined the confidence the public have in vaccinations in general.
The whole thing is about money and protecting the power of the drug cartel, the same reason why healing methods that do not involve the drug or the scalpel are ridiculed, condemned and marginalised by the medical establishment. The top ten drug companies make more in profits than the rest of the Fortune 500 combined
'Sell, sell, sell ...take, take, take ...'
The entire structure of global 'medicine' is a web of corruption, lies and deceit. What an irony that Wakefield has been accused of a conflict of interest over his research on behalf of families with autistic children when the bribery of doctors by drug companies is common practice. Doctors on the take is the norm, not the rarity.
And I mean bribe, like on a monumental scale. As this Internet article says:
'Big Pharma spends nearly $19 billion a year bribing and influencing physicians, by the way. That's billion with a "B." How much money is $19 billion? It's more money than NASA wastes smashing satellites into Mars and exploding space shuttles in Earth's upper atmosphere. It's more money than the entire junk food industry spends hypnotizing obese children into nagging their parents for another box of sugar-bomb breakfast cereal at the quickie mart. Heck, It's more money than the entire United States spends on genuine disease prevention and health education.'
(http://www.newstarget.com/019179.html)
And yet Dr. Wakefield is accused of a 'conflict of interest' for representing the families of autistic children while publishing research on the connection with MMR. The Journal of the American Medical Association has proposed changes to current practice that would:
Prohibit doctors from accepting free drug samples.
Exclude doctors who have financial ties to drug companies from serving on the hospital panels that determine which medicines should be on the preferred prescribing lists.
Prohibit drug companies from providing direct financing for educational programming.
Prohibit medical faculty from belonging to pharmaceutical companies' speakers' bureaus or publishing drug company articles as their own.
Require faculty members that receive financial support from pharmaceutical companies to post them on public Internet sites.