LP
Should it be a rule that we can only use"High End Feats"?
I think we should only count the highest end character feats here, it would slow down the petty arguing over really low showings from certain characters i.e flash/superman/WW/spiderman....basically all comic characters.
It'll make threads a lot more easier to debate in, if someone wants to be a smartass and mention how Superman lost to jimmy olsen once, or GL losing to Slade we can just say it doesn't count because it's a low end feat.
Of course, some character's will raise from streetlevel to high streetlevel, but so what? Every character's power will have to raise too.
CBRF "VS Forum" only uses high end feats, and their threads are usually way more streamlined.
I say it should be made a rule that only high end feats are counted in arguments and low end feats are discounted, unless the high end feats fall into the C.I.S or P.I.S or SMvFL category. It's a smart move and will keep people from bickering and flaming.
KHE
Re: Should it be a rule that we can only use"High End Feats"?
No. No way. Hell no. F*CK no.
The way they do that is bullsh*t. It just give you the opportunity to giver your favorite character a verbal handjob at the expense of actual debating. I don't mind certain things being ignored because of PIS/CIS, but ALLL characters have thier good and bad days. One uber moment does not sweep all those retarded ones under the rug thankyou very much.
It's already meant to be assumed on this forum that all fighters come into this at their most intelligent and effective. That should be enough.
YAH
Re: Should it be a rule that we can only use"High End Feats"?
Originally posted by long pig
I think we should only count the highest end character feats here, it would slow down the petty arguing over really low showings from certain characters i.e flash/superman/WW/spiderman....basically all comic characters.It'll make threads a lot more easier to debate in, if someone wants to be a smartass and mention how Superman lost to jimmy olsen once, or GL losing to Slade we can just say it doesn't count because it's a low end feat.
Of course, some character's will raise from streetlevel to high streetlevel, but so what? Every character's power will have to raise too.
CBRF "VS Forum" only uses high end feats, and their threads are usually way more streamlined.
I say it should be made a rule that only high end feats are counted in arguments and low end feats are discounted, unless the high end feats fall into the C.I.S or P.I.S or SMvFL category. It's a smart move and will keep people from bickering and flaming.
Yeah...... how would someone like Juggernaut compete. 😏
It also addresses a point, my good friend Whirly devoted a thread to......
'Is debating all about winning ? '
🙂
CM
chilled monkey
Senior Member
Re: Re: Should it be a rule that we can only use"High End Feats"?
Originally posted by Khellendros
No. No way. Hell no. F*CK no.The way they do that is bullsh*t. It just give you the opportunity to giver your favorite character a verbal handjob at the expense of actual debating. I don't mind certain things being ignored because of PIS/CIS, but ALLL characters have thier good and bad days. One uber moment does not sweep all those retarded ones under the rug thankyou very much.
It's already meant to be assumed on this forum that all fighters come into this at their most intelligent and effective. That should be enough.
You said it.
To have a real debate you have to look at the whole picture, good moments and bad.
High End Feats only is a bad idea.
YAH
Re: Re: Re: Should it be a rule that we can only use"High End Feats"?
Originally posted by chilled monkey
You said it.To have a real debate you have to look at the whole picture, good moments and bad.
High End Feats only is a bad idea.
Indeed. 🙂
"It also addresses a point, my good friend Whirly devoted a thread to......
'Is debating all about winning ? ' "