Should it be a rule that we can only use"High End Feats"?

Originally posted by yahman
I disagree 😄

🙂 🙂 🙂

You would. 🙄 but as is ever the case you'd be very wrong. 😱

I have an idea for a thread which i'll think you'll enjoy tonight !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

🙂 🙂 🙂 🙂

Originally posted by long pig
I think we should only count the highest end character feats here, it would slow down the petty arguing over really low showings from certain characters i.e flash/superman/WW/spiderman....basically all comic characters.

It'll make threads a lot more easier to debate in, if someone wants to be a smartass and mention how Superman lost to jimmy olsen once, or GL losing to Slade we can just say it doesn't count because it's a low end feat.

Of course, some character's will raise from streetlevel to high streetlevel, but so what? Every character's power will have to raise too.

CBRF "VS Forum" only uses high end feats, and their threads are usually way more streamlined.

I say it should be made a rule that only high end feats are counted in arguments and low end feats are discounted, unless the high end feats fall into the C.I.S or P.I.S or SMvFL category. It's a smart move and will keep people from bickering and flaming.

I say the biggest high enders are FF, supes, and wolverine.

Originally posted by masterbruce
How about eliminating the lowest feats and the highest feats, that way we get the character as he usually is

therefore no including Gladiator can crush a star or firelord gets beaten by spiderman

cuz I hate it when people claim that Flash will just beat everyone when he practically never does it in the comics

I mean if Flash could really stop time or even travel in time, why doesn't he just eliminate or capture every villain, it would literally be a blink of an eye to everyone else

I think the rules are fine, besides prep.

People just need to read and apply the rules.

No. Only high end feats doesnt work. Every character have low showings that get into theyr average. Thats something that needs to be taken into account.

Otherwise who would lose of the top tier and above?

its a reasonable idea. after all it cuts through the inconsistancies. i like it

therefore its now law

<<How about eliminating the lowest feats and the highest feats, that way we get the character as he usually is
therefore no including Gladiator can crush a star or firelord gets beaten by spiderman
cuz I hate it when people claim that Flash will just beat everyone when he practically never does it in the comics
I mean if Flash could really stop time or even travel in time, why doesn't he just eliminate or capture every villain, it would literally be a blink of an eye to everyone else>>

ahhhh, a debater after my own heart. i've always tried to eliminate BOTH ends of the spectrum. the average is what gives the best indication of a character and weeds out the pis in BOTH high and low ends. imho it's the only way to go.