Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
I see so you feel that there is no gay gene, or mosaic complex and "gayness" is purely a product of the environment - interesting do you have evidence?
Yes, hang on. I did a study on it once. 😕
I wasn't making that point at all- merely that it would be hard for 'gayness' to have a phenotypical manifestation that would reveal that person's sexuality.
I think the only answer to this broad quesiton can be 'both'. There are obviously instances of both sources.
Originally posted by Alpha Centaurihysterical
I enjoy girl on girl.Couldn't give a f*ck if it's lesbians, bisexuals or horribly teasy straight girls. They don't have to be lesbian.
Whilst I can only speak for me, I think any man complaining about girl on girl is lying. But that's me, Amity may not be lying. I personally don't see women, doing each other, and think "Man...I can't STAND this." I think "Yes, yes."
-AC