Time is Relative to speed :)
Originally posted by KillAll
IF you believe this i'm adding you to my ignore list... thats rediculous. lol, time travel isnt possible, one way or the other.
just do a google search I just did and 😕 heres the simplest site I can find supporting exactly what I said 🙂
http://www.themodernreligion.com/basic/quran/quran_time.htm
Weird but it even gives a similar account to my own 😕 but then most sites will as Albert suggested this stuff almost 100 years ago.
Ignore me but not the father of modern Physics
Keep the faith🙂
Stay Whirly 🤘
it doesnt take that much to send galactus on his way. reletivly speaking of course. he doesnt strike me as the kind of person to fight for a planet when its possible he could use as much power in the fight as he will gain from the planet itself. i think if he sees that there might be a bit of a fight he rather be on his way, there are billions of other planets out there for him. thor could never take galactus one on one. is he has any trouble at all with the surfer galactus is infinitly higher up in terms of power and intellegence.
Originally posted by long pig
Correct me if I'm wrong but, Lord Chaos uses Magic and Master Order uses Power Cosmic, right?Is this something I just made up in my head?
Indeed. Ignore whirly, but not me. Oh no sir. Not me.
Lots of people ignore me someone else added me to there ignore list yesterday 🙁 Oh well there loss 😆
that was the dumbest thing i think i've ever read. time doesnt travel faster in a plane than in a car. it will be 5 o'clock here, + whatever time it takes to travel when you reach your destination. unless you count different time zones. which isnt really time travel.
and traveling at the speed of light isnt possible for us. we have to much mass.
ok, let me use your own theory against you. take something that doesnt view time at all (such as a tree, or plant). put it in a shuttle. send it through space. it is gone *our time* for a minute. but its traveling at near light speeds. when the tree returns, it could in theory be full grown because you propelled its mass faster?? do you realize how dumb this is.
In physics, a wormhole, also known as an Einstein-Rosen bridge (and less commonly as an Einstein-Rosen-Podolsky bridge or Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen bridge), is a hypothetical topological feature of spacetime that is essentially a "shortcut" through space and time. A wormhole has at least two mouths which are connected to a single throat. Matter can 'travel' from one mouth to the other by passing through the throat.
The name "wormhole" comes from the following analogy used to explain the phenomenon: imagine that the universe is the skin of an apple, and a worm is traveling over its surface. The distance from one side of the apple to the other is equal to half the apple's circumference if the worm stays on the apple's surface, but if it instead burrows a wormhole directly through the apple the distance it has to travel is considerably less.
Time travel is the concept of moving forward and backward to different points in time, much as we do through space. It also includes traveling sideways in time between parallel realities or universes.
Humans are in fact always travelling in time — in a linear fashion, from the present to the immediate future, inexorably, until death. Some theories, most notably special and general relativity, suggest that suitable geometries of spacetime, or certain types of motion in space, may allow time travel into the past and future if these geometries or motions are possible. It has been confirmed that the effects of relativistic and gravitational time dilation can cause a traveller who starts at and returns to a point of origin that remains stationary, to arrive at a time farther in the future in that reference frame than their subjective elapsed time would indicate (a constrained form of time travel into the future).
In physics, the concept of time travel has been often used to examine the consequences of physical theories such as special relativity, general relativity and quantum mechanics. There is no experimental evidence of time travel, and it is not even well understood whether (let alone how) the current physical theories permit any kind of time travel. However, theories do exist about the possibility of folding time to hop from one point to another.
In science fiction it is a recurring plot device, used to set a character in a particular time not their own, and explore the character's interaction with the people and technology of that time—as a kind of culture shock. Other ramifications explored are change and reactions to it, such as alternate histories.
A proposed time-travel machine using a wormhole would (hypothetically) work something like this: A wormhole is created somehow. One end of the wormhole is accelerated to nearly the speed of light, perhaps with an advanced spaceship, and then brought back to the point of origin.
Due to time dilation, the accelerated end of the wormhole has now experienced less subjective passage of time than the stationary end. An object that goes into the stationary end would come out of the other end in the past relative to the time when it enters. One significant limitation of such a time machine is that it is only possible to go as far back in time as the initial creation of the machine; in essence, it is more of a path through time than it is a device that itself moves through time, and it would not allow the technology itself to be moved backwards in time. This could provide an alternative explanation for Hawking's observation: a time machine will be built someday, but has not yet been built, so the tourists from the future cannot reach this far back in time.
time is really just a concept, we are here in the "present" and always will be. you cannot cut/fold/bend/repeat time. you cannot travel through something that isnt physical. a wormhole cant connect 2 universes. there is only one universe. what does the wormhole cut through? where does the other universe exist, if not inside our own?? it is impossible to have overlapping universes. you cant lay a universe on top of another, when our own universe expandes out in every direction for an infinite distance. does the alternate universe lay inbetween the molecules of ours?? if it does, then why couldnt we see things from this other universe??
Originally posted by KillAll
time is really just a concept, we are here in the "present" and always will be. you cannot cut/fold/bend/repeat time. you cannot travel through something that isnt physical. a wormhole cant connect 2 universes. there is only one universe. what does the wormhole cut through? where does the other universe exist, if not inside our own?? it is impossible to have overlapping universes. you cant lay a universe on top of another, when our own universe expandes out in every direction for an infinite distance. does the alternate universe lay inbetween the molecules of ours?? if it does, then why couldnt we see things from this other universe??
Sorry your wrong my friend🙂
Time Dilation in terms of Special relativity has been proven
Suppose Mary is watching a train go by. On the train is John. Next to him is a "light clock": two horizontal mirrors, one on the train floor and one several feet above it. The mirrors are reflecting a beam of light back and forth. Every time light makes a round trip between the mirrors it counts as one tick of the clock. John's watch is synchronized with this clock. Similarly, Mary has a light clock next to her, and her watch is synchronized with it. As the train moves, John will see no change in the synchronization of his watch with the light clock. And why should he? The light will always move the same distance between the two mirrors, and since its speed is constant, the clock will tick at the same rate.
But Mary sees John's light clock differently. After the light leaves the lower mirror, it must travel a longer distance to the upper mirror because the upper mirror has moved forward with the train (this is, of course, assuming the clocks and watches are very accurate). Similarly, when light bounces back from the upper mirror, the lower mirror will move while the light is in transit, forcing it to travel a longer distance. Since light travels at a constant speed, Mary will conclude that the time it takes to make one round trip between the mirrors--one "tick" of the light clock--will be longer. And John's watch, which is synchronized to the mirrors, will also appear slower to Mary.
Such an effect, of course, is negligible for a real train because light travels so fast. But if John were on not a train but a spaceship going close to the speed of light, this relativistic effect could be significant. Mary would see time slow down for John. She might observe him to be gone for 20 years. But because she also sees time slowing down for him, he may appear to have aged only 10 years when he returns.
This effect has actually been observed, using highly accurate atomic clocks. When two such clocks were synchronized and one was flown on a high-speed airplane, the clock that flew came back to earth running behind its stationary partner.
The crucial factor is how close to the speed of light one is going. The equations of special relativity show that the faster you go, the stronger the effects on time. enjoy 🙂
800 000 internet sites agree 🙂
Keep the faith🙂
Stay Whirly 🤘
and yes I believe it as its been proven 🙂
so if 80,000 websites are made that say pink elephants exist, its true?
what you are saying about light, is just the distance light has to travel for our eyes to see it. its like if i was standing at a star that you would see out in space, and you were here on earth. if the said star exploded, and i witnessed it, then traveled to earth faster than light, to tell you about a star that was "going to explode". in actuality the person on earth would just see what already happened. it just took that long for light to travel to earth to see it. but i would have already witnessed these events. it doesnt change the fact that it happened before. it is like a delayed reaction. its not actually the slowing down or speeding up of time. its just how we percieve the event.
Originally posted by KillAll
again, let me ask you the original question i would like you to answer. forget clocks. if you put a plant on a shuttle and send it off through space at the speed of light. it all the sudden grows faster because you propelled its mass... faster? doesnt make sense does it.
At the end of the day the views displayed here are those of some of the greatest scientific minds we've ever had. No offence but you're just an average joe who disputes it because you dont understand it. While your opinions are valuable they dont cut it against such opposition and certainly hold relatively little weight in a debate.
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
At the end of the day the views displayed here are those of some of the greatest scientific minds we've ever had. No offence but you're just an average joe who disputes it because you dont understand it. While your opinions are valuable they dont cut it against such opposition and certainly hold relatively little weight in a debate.
so does you objection,therefore its irrelevant. no essays please.... 😊
its not that i dont understand the opposing side. its just i disagree w/ it. i believe exactly what i've stated. time travel will never be possible... ever. you mind trying to relate (humor me) to me how a tree would grow faster if you propel its mass faster? let me relate to you yet again. IF we could spin the earth at light speed, but keep our bodies stationary, we could grow crops faster??? we could feed everybody that is starving by this simple concept? you see how silly it sounds...