Originally posted by Black Adam
I though I'd take advantage of the Cyclops vs Wolverine debate still going on and get a few more responses here.That and i was bored.....
🙂
I know. I was just kidding. It's a good idea (damn you for thinking of it first 😠 ). We should get some interesting posts 😖hifty:
Originally posted by batdude123
Well, considering Wolverine has beaten Havok in the comics alread, I'd say that Wolverine would win. And don't say that what I'm saying is BS just because I happen to be a Wolverine fan!
But remember that this isn't the same situation as in the comics. There is a different battle ground, different rules, and both sides are out to win. Given all of that and the fact that Havok can release a onmi-directional blast, how can Wolverine even get close to him (in this fight)?
All because a fight goes a certain way in comics, it doesn't mean that the outcome will be the same in a forum fight. You have to explain why someone would in this situation.
Originally posted by batdude123
Well, considering Wolverine has beaten Havok in the comics alread, I'd say that Wolverine would win. And don't say that what I'm saying is BS just because I happen to be a Wolverine fan!
How will Wolverine avoid a Plasma blast that is coming from all directions?
Whats stopping Havok from hitting Wolverine with a blast that melts the skin and organs from his body instantly?
Originally posted by batdude123
Well, it's been proven in the comics that Havoks plasma blasts didn't hurt Wolverine when he was charging at Havok. And what do you mean we can't use some examples from comic books. Everbody else does!
It's plasma. It burns away skin and organs.
Unless Wolverine skin has become fire resistant The blast will affect him
Originally posted by batdude123
Well, it's been proven in the comics that Havoks plasma blasts didn't hurt Wolverine when he was charging at Havok. And what do you mean we can't use some examples from comic books. Everbody else does!
First of all, unless Wolverine has developed an immunity to heat then he will get hurt by Havok's blasts.
And I don't mean you can't use comic book examples in a fight, I meant that given the different situations in which those fights take place some of them are not applicable. Sorry, I should have made that clearer.
Originally posted by batdude123
Oh God, here we go again. People refuting evidence that was in a comic book. 🙄
Given the fact that Marvel has been publishing X-Men comics for decades just about everyone has beaten everyone else at some point in time.You can't just say "this guy beat that guy once" and say that covers every fight they could have in all circumstances.
The details of that fight and this one are different.
If they fight indoors things might be different than if they fought outdoors for example. The fight isn't dependant on past outcomes although they can be used to support a logical argument. You have to explain why you think one character will win in this fight, not just state that he won a previous fight.
Originally posted by TheKahn
Given the fact that Marvel has been publishing X-Men comics for decades just about everyone has beaten everyone else at some point in time.You can't just say "this guy beat that guy once" and say that covers every fight they could have in all circumstances.The details of that fight and this one are different.
If they fight indoors things might be different than if they fought outdoors for example. The fight isn't dependant on past outcomes although they can be used to support a logical argument. You have to explain why you think one character will win in this fight, not just state that he won a previous fight.
I completely understand where you're coming from. 🙂