wannabe
P10 commercial Mindguard
Originally posted by stormfront13
alright, i don't really feel like quoting all of this, so I'm just gonna do it all at once. I wasn't trying to make thsi debate wholey based on science, I was on;y partially using science, and the rest was based off comic facts, and common sence. the cyke dodging thing wasn't based purley on science, as much as it was common sence. going by comic facts, storms own discharged ligthning should move slower than natural lightning, or else, she would never miss her targets, and her targets wouldn't be able to dodge. scott hasn't dodged natural lightning, and from comic facts and commom sence, he wouldn't be able to. i don't think the peed of the blast counts seeing as storm has already easily dodged them before. sunlight and electricity are two different things. cykes powers are based off of absorbing sunlight, so naturally he wouldn't need to concentrate to absorb sunlight. you have no proof of his electricity absorbation is always on, and I have no proof it isn't, so going by the past, he would go down naturally. he has been hurt by plasma and electrical attacks before, so why not now? sebastion shaws and bishops absorbation is always on, and she has taken both of them down with ligthning before? cyke isn't even close to them in absorbing power, so he would naturally go down.
1) It's ok for me when you use science and common sense to make your point, i tend to do so myself.
What bothers me is, that you use scientific reasoning for explanation why Scott can't dodge a lightning, even though he already did, and at the same time say that it would be common sense that Storm can dodge Scott's blasts because she already did it, even though scientifically she shouldn't be able to do so either.
Why is the speed of the lightning good as an explanation for Scott's inability to dodge, EVEN THOUGH he did it in the past, whereas the speed of his blast does not count as an explanation for Storm's inability to dodge, BECAUSE Storm did it in the past???
That's complete bias, which i can understand, cause Scott sucks, but in a good debate it's only lame.
2) That you even try to make a difference between the speed of body charged lightning and natural lightning is amazing.
That you try to reason it with common sense, because Scott never dodged a natural lightning (yeah, he became confronted with it in most of his past fights) and Storm ALWAYS strikes with it, but people have proven to be able to dodge her body charged lightning, is EVEN MORE amazing.
At the same time you proclaim, that she can produce natural lightning out of clear air as quick as the other one. Wouldn't your "common sense" dictate her to use only her natural lightning, because it's as quickly produced as the other one , but it's much faster and so never misses???
3) Yes, electricity is not Scott's primary energy source and causes him a lot of pain when he absorbs it, but he has impressively proven to be able to do it.
And whether he has to concentrate on it or not is irrelevant, because it would be rather foolish for a good tactician like him not to expect to be hit by one of Storm's "fast natural lightnings that he was never able to dodge in the past"...so he would concentrate on doing so in a clear duel, if it was necessary.
See, i can use common sense too!
Originally posted by Wynndar
So is Cyclops now a premier energy absorber now?
NOOO, Scott's primary power is definitely not energy absorption, like it is for Bishop and Shaw, but neither is it for Alex, and yet he absorbed the radiation of a nuclear power plant and the gamma radiation of Hulk...well, and Scott absorbed the electrical energy gathered over minutes by Storm to feed the lifesupport of a planet!
Energy absorption is not the primary feat of the Summers brothers, but for CERTAIN kinds of energy it's PART of their powers.
Btw, Stormfront...interesting that you say on this thread that Storm can take out Bishop with her lightning, while on the Bishop vs. Storm thread, when i said she could PERHAPS overload B, you said it's not going to happen and that she has to use some of her other feats to beat him.
Again:
I said that both have a devastating instant attack and Scott, in a classical "high noon western duell" situation like this, has an edge, because he has proven to be able to take lightning without being incapacitated.