Originally posted by BakaXero
other countries have. and let me say this. i lost respect for my own country for particapating in a pointless war.Australia put in way more funds then America did for the Tsunami Victims.
America Just did not to lose to much face. Iraq should never had happened.
Katrina is their own country you dont have a choice on that.
and Aus has been behind Americas back the whole way. But i reckon Aus does too much for other countries and not enough for its own.
America does a lot for other coutries, it doesn't matter how little or how much they give. The point is that they are helping. And not to mention that the USA have helped other countries in the war worlds. Bush is doing the best he can. Going to Iraq was pointless at first, but now they are helping Iraq, and that should be a good thing.
Thanks Rex. Maybe I shoulden broading my thing a little more to the other countries that have that same problem.
So the US is supposed to go to that country to stop that? Tell me how would they do that? Sending in forces isn't going to make the country obey the laws. Its just going to make the US more and more hated. Unless that country asks for international help with this problem (which it won't) nobody has the right to move in.
And Bush isn't stupid enough to go in. The country has nothing to give to the US.
Originally posted by RedAlertv2
Unfourtunately I think there are worse problems in the world. Not to mention Bush doesnt care about Trinidad. No oil there.
Actually , Trinidad does have oil . That isn't even the point of this thread , but just so all of you know out of research I know that Trinidad has oil.
Originally posted by debbiejo
Don't know....Do they do things for the right reasons, or does there have to be something in it for them to get involved.😕
Yeah the security council voting yes...
And guess what? The security council has a few country's in it that really don't want to go to war right now.. Or intervene in something like this, but the simple fact is. The UN is not a police force. They can help here but they would be doing something they are not supposed to do.
Unless a civil war is going on the UN has no reason to be there... And with a civil war its really hard to determine which side is right and wrong because both will do shit they shouldn't. The UN is not going to go in with some soldiers to stop crimes from happening.
Crimes? is that what you're calling them? Have you read the hundreds of articles that happened? Did you know that terroism could be going on there too? when will it be enough for the UN to get involved? Do they have to go when thousands are killed? they would be going for the right thing...saving hundreds of lives...
Originally posted by debbiejo
OK...Then how about Europe???...Why the US...??
Europe isn't going to touch this thing either. And why the US, because thats what the thread title said 😛
Originally posted by Saratn
Crimes? is that what you're calling them? Have you read the hundreds of articles that happened? Did you know that terroism could be going on there too? when will it be enough for the UN to get involved? Do they have to go when thousands are killed? they would be going for the right thing...saving hundreds of lives...
Yes i'm calling them crimes, because thats what they are. Is there a war going on there? No. Then how the hell could the army stop it. You need more police officers not a freaking army. They might be able to prevent it from happening but they would never capture the people responsible. All it would do is make the army thats there hated. And eventually the people that are making money out of this shit will find ways to continue their work.
An army isn't going to be a good thing in a situation like this. You need a police force.
Originally posted by Fishy
Europe isn't going to touch this thing either. And why the US, because thats what the thread title said 😛Yes i'm calling them crimes, because thats what they are. Is there a war going on there? No. Then how the hell could the army stop it. You need more police officers not a freaking army. They might be able to prevent it from happening but they would never capture the people responsible. All it would do is make the army thats there hated. And eventually the people that are making money out of this shit will find ways to continue their work.
An army isn't going to be a good thing in a situation like this. You need a police force.
Thats the problem . The police aren't doing their jobs and neither is the government